Abstract
In this chapter, we examine and compare scholarly research and media coverage of equity and quality issues with respect to mathematics learning. Our focus is on equity issues that the media are likely to cover including mathematics achievements by gender, ethnicity, and socio-economic background, as well as aspects of school practices such as ability grouping and single-sex classes that are associated with potential variations in the quality of mathematics education experienced by some students. We describe the inevitable tension between the measured and detailed academic documentation of research findings and the media reporting of the same findings constrained by space and time pressures. Quality and equity concerns are discussed in both contexts. Often, however, the versions of the story found in the print media fail to convey accurately or completely the issues fuelling or combating equity and quality in mathematics learning and education more broadly.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
No Child Left Behind.
- 2.
Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics.
- 3.
See the reference list for a record of the print media articles on which we drew for this chapter.
- 4.
Some of these articles were reproduced in multiple print outlets. All were found in online archives and therefore there are no associated page numbers.
References
Atweh, B. (2007). Pedagogy for socially response-able mathematics education. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education, Fremantle. http://www.aare.edu.au/07pap/atw07600.pdf. Accessed 6 May 2009.
Becker, J. R. (2001). Single-gender schooling in the public sector in California: Promise and practice. In B. Atweh, H. Forgasz, & B. Nebres (Eds.), Sociocultural research on mathematics education. An international perspective (pp. 367–378). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Bishop, A. J., & Forgasz, H. J. (2007). Issues in access and equity in mathematics education. In F. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (Vol. 2, pp. 1145–1167). Reston: NCTM.
Boaler, J., Wiliam, D., & Brown, M. (2000). Students’ experiences of ability grouping—disaffection, polarisation and the construction of failure. British Educational Research Journal, 26(5), 631–648.
Forgasz, H. J. (2006). Australian year 12 mathematics enrolments: Patterns and trends—past and present. International Centre of Excellence for Education in Mathematics [ICE-EM]. http://www.ice-em.org.au/images/stories/FileDownloads/1.pdf. Accessed 21 Feb 2008.
Forgasz, H. (2008). Gender, socio-economic status, and mathematics: Performance among high achievers. In O. Figueras, J. L. Cortina, S. Alatorre, T. Rojano, & A. Sepúlveda (Eds.), Mathematical ideas: History, education and cognition. Proceedings of the Joint Conference PME32—PMENAXXX (Vol. 3, pp. 25–32). Morelia: Cinvestav-UMSNH (Also available on CD-ROM).
Forgasz, H., & Tan, H. (2009). ‘Streaming’ for mathematics in Victorian secondary schools. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Mathematics Research Group of Australasia, Wellington, July.
Forgasz, H. J., & Leder, G. C. (1995). Single-sex mathematics classes: Who benefits? Nordisk Matematik Didaktik (Nordic Studies in Mathematics), 3(1), 27–46.
Forgasz, H. J., & Leder, G. C. (2008). Beliefs about mathematics and mathematics teaching. In P. Sullivan & T. Wood (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics teacher education: Vol. 1. Knowledge and beliefs in mathematics teaching and teaching development (pp. 173–192). Rotterdam: Sense.
Forgasz, H. J., Leder, G. C., & Taylor, C. (2007). Research versus the media: Mixed or single-gender settings? Paper presented at the annual conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education. http://www.aare.edu.au/07pap/for07148.pdf. Accessed 27 Apr 2008.
Gill, J. (1988). Which way to school? Canberra: Curriculum Development Centre.
Hyde, J. S., Lindberg, S. M., Linn, M. C., Ellis, A. B., & Williams, C. C. (2008). Gender similarities characterize math performance. Science, 321, 494–495.
Ireson, J., Hallam, S., Hack, S., Clark, H., & Plewis, I. (2002). Ability grouping in English secondary school: Effects on attainment in English, mathematics, and science. Educational Research and Evaluation: An International Journal on Theory and Practice, 8(3), 299–318.
Leder, G. C., & Forgasz, H. J. (1997) Single-sex classes in a co-educational high school: Highlighting parents’ perspectives. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 9(3), 274–291.
Leder, G. C., & Forgasz, H. J. (2002). Measuring mathematical beliefs and their impact on the learning of mathematics: A new approach. In G. Leder, E. Pehkonen, & G. Toerner (Eds.), Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education? (pp. 95–113). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Leder, G. C., Forgasz, H. J., & Solar, C. (1996). Research and intervention programs in mathematics education: A gendered issue. In A. Bishop, K. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & C. Laborde (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics education (Pt. 2, pp. 945–985). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Linchevski, L., & Kutscher, B. (1998). Tell me with whom you’re learning, and I’ll tell you how much you’ve learned: Mixed-ability versus same-ability grouping in mathematics. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 29(5), 533–554.
Lynch, K., & Baker, J. (2005). Equality in education. An equality of condition perspective. Theory and Research in Education, 3(2), 131–164.
MCEECDYA. (2009). Student report 2009. http://www.naplan.edu.au/verve/_resources/NAPLAN_yr_3_with_mean_example.pdf. Accessed 2 Dec 2009.
NAPLAN. (2008). National assessment program. Literacy and numeracy. http://www.naplan.edu.au/verve/_resources/2ndStageNationalReport_18Dec_v2.pdf. Accessed 3 Jan 2008.
Parker, L. J., & Rennie, L. H. (1995). To mix of not to mix? An update on the single-ses/coeducation debate. Pre-conference draft. Paper presented at the Australian Association for Research in Education annual conference, Hobart, Australia, November.
Rennie, L. R., & Parker, L. H. (1997). Students’ and teachers’ perceptions of single-sex and mixed-sex mathematics classes. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 9(3), 257–273.
Teese, R., Davies, M., Charlton, M., & Polesel, J. (1995). Who wins at school? Boys and girls in Australian secondary education. Melbourne: Commonwealth of Australia.
TheNewspaperWorks. (2009). Newspaper circulation steady—sales continue to withstand economic crisis. http://about.theage.com.au/userpdfs/MR_readcirc0905.pdf. Accessed 24 July 2009.
Vale, C. M., & Leder, G. C. (2004). Student views of computer based mathematics in the middle school years: Does gender make a difference. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 56, 287–312.
Zevenbergen, R. (2003). Ability grouping in mathematics classrooms: A Bourdieuian analysis. For the Learning of Mathematics, 23(3), 5–10.
Media Sources
Arup, T. (2008, December 20). Aboriginal children fail basic schools tests. The Age.
Bachelard, M., & Power, L. (2008, November 9). Class divide. The Age.
Baker, J. (2008, December 18). Unequal access begins at school. The Age.
Buckingham, J. (2008, November 6). Brightest and best miss out. The Australian.
Denholm, M. (2008, November 1). Gillard praises Tasmania for lead on school ratings. The Australian.
Donnelly, K. (2008, December 10). Wake-up call to education chiefs. The Australian.
Drape, J. (2008, December 19). Girls better writers, boys lead in maths. The Age.
Dumenden, I. (2008, December 18). More than a number. The Age.
Editorial. (2008, November 9). Looking at both sides of the gender question in schools. The Age.
Elder, J. (2008, December 14). Best friends face VCE results with a bond that will last. The Age.
Ferrari, J. (2008, December 10). Aussies behind in maths, science: Study. The Australian.
Ferrari, J. (2008, December 10). Doesn’t add up: Borat kids beat Aussies in maths and science. The Australian.
Ferrari, J. (2008, December 23). One in three indigenous kids fail test. The Australian.
Ferrari, J. (2008, December 24). Call for plan to tackle indigenous youth illiteracy. The Australian.
Ferrari, J. (2008, December 27). Indigenous literacy levels higher for city kids. The Australian.
Ferrari, J., & Trounson, A. (2008, November 25). Testing literacy and numeracy is vital. The Australian.
Perkins, M. (2008, December 15). Wait over for nearly 50,000 students.
Perkins, M. (2008, December 16). VCE results. The Age.
Perkins, M. (2008, December 16). Private school students scoop scholarships. The Age.
Perkins, M. (2008, December 18). MacRob scores top marks seven years running. The Age.
Perkins, M. (2008, December 18). College’s VCE result a sign of big success. The Age.
Roberts, B. (2008, December 15). Days of the old school yard are over. What’s next?. The Age.
Scott, E., & Turnbull, J. (2008, December 15). Boys outnumber girls at top VCE level. The Age.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Forgasz, H.J., Leder, G.C. (2010). Equity and Quality of Mathematics Education: Research and Media Portrayals. In: Atweh, B., Graven, M., Secada, W., Valero, P. (eds) Mapping Equity and Quality in Mathematics Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9803-0_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9803-0_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-9802-3
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-9803-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)