Advertisement

TREATMENT OF OILY WASTEWATER

  • JOSÉ COCA
  • GEMMA GUTIÉRREZ
  • JOSÉM BENITO
Conference paper
Part of the NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security book series (NAPSC)

Abstract

Oily wastewaters are generated in many industrial processes, such as petroleum refining, petrochemical, food, leather and metal finishing. Fats, oils and greases (FOG’s) present in these wastewaters have to be removed before the water can be reused in a closed-loop process or discharged into the sewer system or to surface waters. These oily waters are mainly in the form of oil-in-water (O/W) emulsions that pose a great problem in facilities attempting to stay in compliance with discharge limits. Emulsion breaking and oil removal require a basic understanding of the physical properties and chemical composition of O/W emulsions. Several properties playing a key role in the stability of an O/W emulsion should be measured for the selection of the appropriate separation process. Only those of industrial relevance will be discussed here, specifically, surface and interfacial tension, contact angle (wetting), zeta potential and droplet size distribution. Treatment of oily wastewaters is performed by a variety of methods and the degree of oil removal depends mainly on the concentration and physical nature of the oil present and its droplet size. The purpose of this work is to study oil/water system characteristics and properties, and techniques for removing oil and grease from industrial wastewaters in analogy with sewage treatment processes. These techniques include gravity and centrifugal separations, chemical treatment, flotation, filtration, membrane processes, evaporation, activated carbon adsorption, biological treatment, and integrated or hybrid processes. Operating parameters, equipment design, treatment costs, range of operation, and the possibility of O/W emulsion reformulation before treatment will also be covered.

Keywords

Chemical Oxygen Demand Zeta Potential Interfacial Tension Biochemical Oxygen Demand Cetyl Trimethyl Ammonium Bromide 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ahmad AL, Sumathi S, Hameed BH (2005) Residual oil and suspended solid removal using natural adsorbents chitosan, bentonite, and activated carbon: a comparative study. Chem Eng J 108:179–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Al-Zoubi H, Al-Thyabat S, Al-Khatib L (2009) A hybrid flotation-membrane process for wastewater treatment: an overview. Desalin Water Treat 7:60–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. American Petroleum Institute (1959) Manual on disposal of refinery wastes: waste water containing oil. API, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Antunes M, Medronho RA (1992) Bradley hydrocyclones: design and performance analysis. In: Svarovsky L, Thew MT (eds) Hydrocyclones. Analysis and applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  5. Aranberri I, Beverley KJ, Binks BP, Clint JH, Fletcher PDI (2002) How do emulsions evaporate? Langmuir 18:3471–3475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Aranberri I, Binks BP, Clint JH, Fletcher PDI (2003) Retardation of oil drop evaporation from oil-in-water emulsions. Chem Commun 9:2538–2539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Aranberri I, Binks BP, Clint JH, Fletcher PDI (2004) Evaporation rates of water from concentrated oil-in-water emulsions. Langmuir 20:2069–2074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bailey PA (1977) Treatment of waste emulsified oils by ultrafiltration. Filtr Sep 14:53–55Google Scholar
  9. Bancroft WD (1913) The theory of emulsification, V. J Phys Chem 17:501–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Belkacem M, Hadjiev D, Aurelle Y (1995a) A model for calculating the steady state flux of organic ultrafiltration membranes for the case of cutting oil emulsions. Chem Eng J 56:27–32Google Scholar
  11. Belkacem M, Matamoros H, Cabassud C, Aurelle Y, Cotteret J (1995b) New results in metal working wastewater treatment using membrane technology. J Membr Sci 106:195–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Benito JM, Ríos G, Pazos C, Coca J (1998) Methods for the separation of emulsified oil from water: a state-of-the-art review. In: Trends in chemical engineering, vol. 4. Research Trends, Trivandrum, pp 203–231Google Scholar
  13. Benito JM, Ríos G, Gutiérrez B, Pazos C, Coca J (1999) Integrated process for the removal of emulsified oils from effluents in the steel industry. Sep Sci Technol 34:3031–3043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Benito JM, Ríos G, Ortea E, Fernández E, Cambiella A, Pazos C, Coca J (2002) Design and construction of a modular pilot plant for the treatment of oil-containing wastewaters. Desalination 147:5–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Benito JM, Cambiella A, Lobo A, Gutiérrez G, Coca J, Pazos C (2010) Formulation, characterization and treatment of metalworking oil-in-water emulsions. Clean Technol Environ Policy 12:31–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bennett GF (1988) The removal of oil from wastewater by air flotation: a review. CRC Crit Rev Environ Control 18:189–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bernard C, Herremans L, Herviou P, Poujol T (1995) Air flotation as an effective procedure for treatment of hydrocarbon loaded rain runoff. Tech Sci Methodes: Genie Urbain – Genie Rural 11:864–865Google Scholar
  18. Beverley KJ, Clint JH, Fletcher PDI (1999) Evaporation rates of pure liquids measured using a gravimetric technique. Phys Chem Chem Phys 1:149–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bhattacharyya D, Jumawan AB, Grieves RB, Harris LR (1979) Ultrafiltration characteristics of oil–detergent–water systems: membrane fouling mechanisms. Sep Sci Technol 14:529–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Bhave RR (1991) Inorganic membranes. Synthesis, characteristics and applications. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Bishop J, Arlidge D (1979) Evaporators: use in re-refining. Hydrocarbon Process 58(7):131–136Google Scholar
  22. Cambiella A, Benito JM, Pazos C, Coca J (2006a) Centrifugal separation efficiency in the treatment of waste emulsified oils. Chem Eng Res Des 84:69–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Cambiella A, Ortega E, Ríos G, Benito JM, Pazos C, Coca J. (2006b) Treatment of oil-in-water emulsions: performance of a sawdust bed filter. J Hazard Mater 131:195–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Cañizares P, García-Gómez J, Martínez F, Rodrigo MA (2004) Evaluation of a simple batch distillation process for treating wastes from metalworking industries. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 79:533–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Chakrabarty B, Ghosal AK, Purkait MK (2008) Ultrafiltration of stable oil-in-water emulsion by polysulfone membrane. J Membr Sci 325:422–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Cheng C, Phipps D, Alkhaddar RM (2005) Treatment of spent metalworking fluids. Water Res 39:4051–4063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Cheremisinoff PN (1995) Solids/liquids separations. Technomic, LancasterGoogle Scholar
  28. Cheryan M (1998) Ultrafiltration and microfiltration handbook. Technomic, LancasterGoogle Scholar
  29. Churchill RJ, Burkhardt CW (1976) Photomicrographs can help assess efficiency of oil-removal operation. Oil Gas J 74:76–79Google Scholar
  30. Curtis D. (1996) Hydrocyclone for oil-from-water separation. Filtr Sep 33:291–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Davies GA, Jeffreys GV (1969) Coalescence of droplets in packings: factors affecting the separation of droplet dispersions. Filtr Sep 6:349–354Google Scholar
  32. Dean RB (1948) Modern colloids: an introduction to the physical chemistry of large molecules and small particles. Van Nostrand, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. Dick RM (1982) Ultrafiltration for oily waste water treatment. Lubr Eng 38:219–222Google Scholar
  34. Drioli E, Romano M (2001) Progress and new perspectives on integrated membrane operation for sustainable industrial growth. Ind Eng Chem Res 40:1277–1300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Eppert JJ, Rajagopalan N, DeVor RE, Kapoor SG (2003) Modeling the effect of tramp oil contamination on selective component depletion in metalworking fluid systems. J Manuf Sci Eng 125:85–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Falbe J (1987) Surfactants in consumer products. Springer-Verlag, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  37. Farmaki E, Kaloudis T, Dimitrou K, Thanasoulias N, Kousouris L, Tzoumerkas F (2007) Validation of a FT-IR method for the determination of oils and grease in water using tetrachloroethylene as the extraction solvent. Desalination 210:52–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Fernández E, Benito JM, Pazos C, Coca J, Ruiz I, Ríos G (2005) Regeneration of an oil-in-water emulsion after use in an industrial copper rolling process. Colloid Surf A-Physicochem Eng Asp 263:363–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Friberg SE, Huang T, Aikens PA (1997) Phase changes during evaporation from a vegetable oil emulsion stabilized by a polyoxyethylene {20} sorbitanoleate, Tween® 80. Colloid Surf A-Physicochem Eng Asp 121:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Gavril D, Atta KR, Karaiskakis G (2006) Study of the evaporation of pollutant liquids under the influence of surfactants. AIChE J 52:2381–2390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ghidossi R, Veyret D, Scotto JL, Jalabert T, Moulin P (2009) Ferry oily wastewater treatment. Sep Purif Technol 64:296–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Greeley M., Rajagopalan N. (2004) Impact of environmental contaminants on machining properties of metalworking fluids. Tribol Int 37:327–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Griffin WC (1949) Classification of surface-active agents by HLB. J Soc Cosmet Chem 1:311–326Google Scholar
  44. Griffin WC (1954) Calculation of HLB values of non-ionic surfactants. J Soc Cosmet Chem 5:249–256Google Scholar
  45. Gutiérrez G, Cambiella A, Benito JM, Pazos C, Coca J (2007) The effect of additives on the treatment of oil-in-water emulsions by vacuum evaporation. J Hazard Mater 144:649–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Gutiérrez G, Lobo A, Allende D, Cambiella A, Pazos C, Coca J, Benito JM (2008) Influence of coagulant salt addition on the treatment of oil-in-water emulsions by centrifugation, ultrafiltration and vacuum evaporation. Sep Sci Technol 43:1884–1895CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Gutiérrez G, Benito JM, Coca J, Pazos C (2009) Vacuum evaporation of waste oil-in-water emulsions from a copper metalworking industry. Ind Eng Chem Res 48:2100–2106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Hilal N, Busca G, Hankins N, Mohammad AW (2004) The use of ultrafiltration and nanofiltration membranes in the treatment of metal-working fluids. Desalination 167:227–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Hlavacek M (1995) Break-up of oil-in-water emulsions induced by permeation through a microfiltration membrane. J Membr Sci 102:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ho WSW, Sirkar KK (1992) Membrane handbook. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  51. Hrudey SE, Kok S (1987) Environmentally relevant characteristics of oil-in-water emulsions. In: Vandermeulen JH, Hrudey SE (eds) Oil in freshwater: chemistry, biology, countermeasure technology. Pergamon Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  52. Hu B, Scott K (2007) Influence of membrane material and corrugation and process conditions on emulsion microfiltration. J Membr Sci 294:30–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Hua FL, Tsang YF, Wang YJ, Chan SY, Chua H, Sin SN (2007) Performance study of ceramic microfiltration membrane for oily wastewater treatment. Chem Eng J 128:169–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Hulsey RA, Kobylinski EA, Leach B, Pearce L (1995) Advanced oxidation treatment of high strength bilge and aqueous petroleum wastewater. Proc 50th Ind Waste Conf 269–279Google Scholar
  55. Hunter RJ (1981) Zeta potential in colloid science. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  56. Iida T, Kume S, Ikeda K, Henmi K, Segawa M, Sasagawa K (1996) Treatment of waste water containing oil component. Patent JP8132020Google Scholar
  57. John J, Bhattacharya M, Raynor PC (2004) Emulsions containing vegetable oils for cutting fluid applications. Colloid Surf A-Physicochem Eng Asp 237:141–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Jönsson AS, Trägårdh G (1990) Ultrafiltration applications. Desalination 77:135–179Google Scholar
  59. Jönsson C, Jönsson AS (1995) The influence of degreasing agents used at car washes on the performance of ultrafiltration membranes. Desalination 100:115–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Karakulski K, Morawski AW (2002) Treatment of spent emulsion from a cable factory by an integrated UF/NF membrane system. Desalination 149:163–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Karakulski K, Kozlowski A, Morawski AW (1995) Purification of oily wastewater by ultrafiltration. Sep Technol 5:197–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Karakulski K, Morawski WA, Grzechulska J (1998) Purification of bilge water by hybrid ultrafiltration and photocatalytic processes. Sep Purif Technol 14:163–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Kenneth JL (1983) Demulsification: industrial applications. Marcel Dekker, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  64. Khan E, Virojnagud W, Ratpukdi T (2004) Use of biomass sorbents for oil removal from gas station runoff. Chemosphere 57:681–689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Kibbey TCG, Pennell KD, Hayes KF (2001) Application of sieve-tray air strippers to the treatment of surfactant-containing wastewaters. AIChE J 47:1461–1470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Koltuniewicz AB, Field RW, Arnot TC (1995) Cross-flow and dead-end microfiltration of oily-water emulsion. Part I: experimental study and analysis of flux decline. J Membr Sci 102:193–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Koros WJ (1991) Membranes: learning a lesson from nature. Chem Eng Prog 91:68–81Google Scholar
  68. Kvernheim AL, Lund HS, Berg B, de Pauw E, Eppe G, Chtaib M. (1999) Development of a new hydrocarbon index for oil in water. Chemosphere 39:2707–2722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Lee SB, Aurelle Y, Roques H (1984) Concentration polarization, membrane fouling and cleaning in ultrafiltration of soluble oil. J Membr Sci 19:23–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Lipp P, Lee CH, Fane AG, Fell CJD (1988) A fundamental study of the ultrafiltration of oil-water emulsions. J Membr Sci 36:161–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Lissant KJ (1974) Emulsions and emulsion technology. Marcel Dekker, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  72. Lunkenheimer K, Zembala M (1997) Attempts to study a water evaporation retardation by soluble surfactants. J Colloid Interface Sci 188:363–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Luthy RG, Selleck RE, Galloway TR (1978) Removal of emulsified oil with organic coagulants and dissolved air flotation. J Water Pollut Control Fed 50:331–346Google Scholar
  74. Mahdi SM, Sköld RO (1991a) Experimental study of membrane filtration for the recycling of synthetic water-based metalworking fluids. Tribol Int 24:389–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Mahdi SM, Sköld RO (1991b) Ultrafiltration for the recycling of a model water-based metalworking fluid. Process design considerations. Lubr Eng 47:686–690Google Scholar
  76. Matos M, Lobo A, Fernández E, Benito JM, Pazos C, Coca J (2008) Recycling of oily ultrafiltration permeates to reformulate O/W emulsions. Colloid Surf A-Physicochem Eng Asp 331:8–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Maybury JP, Mannweiler K, Titchener-Hooker NJ, Hoare M, Dunnill P (1998) The performance of a scaled down industrial disc stack centrifuge with a reduced feed material requirement. Bioprocess Eng 18:191–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. McCabe WL, Smith JC, Harriott P (2005) Unit operations of chemical engineering, 7th edn. McGraw-Hill, BostonGoogle Scholar
  79. Menon VB, Wasan DT (1985) Demulsification. In: Becher P (ed) Encyclopedia of emulsion technology, Vol. 2. Marcel Dekker, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  80. Mohammadi T, Esmaeelifar A (2005) Wastewater treatment of a vegetable oil factory by a hybrid ultrafiltration-activated carbon process. J Membr Sci 254:129–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Mulder M (1991) Basic principles of membrane technology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  82. Mulder M (1994) The use of membrane processes in environmental problems. An introduction. In: Crespo JG, Böddeker KW (eds) Membrane processes in separation and purification. NATO ASI Series 272. Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  83. Mysore D, Viraraghavan T, Jin Y-C (2005) Treatment of oily wasters using vermiculite. Water Res 39:2643–2653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Nazzal FF, Wiesner MR (1996) Microfiltration of oil-in-water emulsions. Water Environ Res 68:1187–1191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Norouzbahari S, Roostaazad R, Hesampour M (2009) Crude oil desalted effluent treatment by a hybrid UF/RO membrane separation process. Desalination 238:174–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Nyström M (1991) Ultrafiltration of O/W emulsions stabilized by limiting amounts of tall oil. Colloids Surf 57:99–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Olsson M, Lindskog N (1995) Membrane technology used for waste water treatment within the Volvo Group. Proc Euromembrane’95 1:525–528Google Scholar
  88. Pankhania M, Brindle K, Stephenson T (1999) Membrane aeration bioreactors for wastewater treatment: completely mixed and plug-flow operation. Chem Eng J 73:131–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Park E, Barnett SM (2001) Oil/water separation using nanofiltration membrane technology. Sep Sci Technol 36:1527–1542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Patterson JW (1985) Industrial wastewater treatment technology. Butterworth, StonehamGoogle Scholar
  91. Pereira S, Peinemann K-V (2006) Membrane technology in the chemical industry. Wiley-VCH, WeinheimGoogle Scholar
  92. Perry RH, Green DW (2007) Perry’s chemical engineers’ handbook, 8th edn. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  93. Plegue TH, Frank SG, Fruman DH, Zakin JL (1986) Viscosity and colloidal properties of concentrated crude oil-in-water emulsions. J Colloid Interface Sci 114:88–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Porter MR (1994) Handbook of surfactants. Blackie Academic & Professional, DevonGoogle Scholar
  95. Pushkarev W, Yuzhanimov AG, Men SK (1983) Treatment of oil containing wastewater. Allenton Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  96. Rees RP, Williams KP (1997) Dissolved air flotation and organic media for the removal of emulsified oil from water. Proc Jubilee Research Event 1:125–128Google Scholar
  97. Rezvanpour A, Roostaazad R, Hesampour M, Nyström M, Ghotbi C (2009) Effective factors in the treatment of kerosene-water emulsion by using UF membranes. J Hazard Mater 161:1216–1224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Ríos G, Pazos C, Coca J (1998) Destabilization of cutting oil emulsions using inorganic salts as coagulants. Colloid Surf A-Physicochem Eng Asp 138:383–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Ríos G, Benito JM, Pazos C, Coca J (2002) Drop size distribution of O/W emulsions by drop immobilization with agarose. J Dispersion Sci Technol 23:721–728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Romero MT, Ferrer N (1999) Determination of oil and grease by solid phase extraction and infrared spectroscopy. Anal Chim Acta 395:77–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Rosenberger S, Krüger U, Witzig R, Manz W, Szewzyk U, Kraume M (2002) Performance of a bioreactor with submerged membranes for aerobic treatment of municipal waste water. Water Res 36:413–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Rozada F, Calvo LF, García AI, Martín-Villacorta J, Otero M (2003) Dye adsorption by sewage sludge-based activated carbons in batch and fixed-bed systems. Bioresour Technol 87:221–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Rozada F, Otero M, Morán A, García AI (2005) Activated carbons from sewage sludge and discarded tyres: production and optimization. J Hazard Mater 124:181–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Scholz W, Fuchs W (2000) Treatment of oil contaminated wastewater in a membrane bioreactor. Water Res 34:3621–3629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Sefiane K (2006) The coupling between evaporation and adsorbed surfactant accumulation and its effect on the wetting and spreading behaviour of volatile drops on a hot surface. J Pet Sci Eng 51:238–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Shaw DJ (1992) Introduction to colloid and surface chemistry. Butterworth-Heinemann, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  107. Simmons MJH, Wilson JA, Azzopardi BJ (2002) Interpretation of the flow characteristics of a primary–oil–water separator from the residence time distribution. Chem Eng Res Des 80:471–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Sköld RO (1991) Field testing of a model water-based metalworking fluid designed for continuous recycling using ultrafiltration. Lubr Eng 47:653–659Google Scholar
  109. Soma J, Papadopoulus KD (1995) Flow of dilute, sub-micron emulsions in granular porous media: effects of pH and ionic strength. Colloid Surf A-Physicochem Eng Asp 101:51–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Specht H (1997) Wirtschaftlich weil abfallarm: Membranfiltration und Vakuumverdampfung. Metalloberfläche 51:410–415Google Scholar
  111. Stephenson T, Judd S, Jefferson B, Brindle K (2000) Membrane bioreactors for wastewater treatment. IWA Publishing, LondonGoogle Scholar
  112. Stewart M, Arnold A (2008) Emulsions and oil treating equipment: selection, sizing and troubleshooting. Gulf Professional Publishing, BurlingtonGoogle Scholar
  113. Sutton PM, Mishra PN, Crawford PM (1994) Combining biological and physical processes for complete treatment of oily wastewaters. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 33:3–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Svarovsky L. (2000) Solid-liquid separation, 4th edn. Butterworth-Heinemann, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  115. Tadros TF, Vincent B (1983) Emulsion stability. In: Becher P (ed) Encyclopedia of emulsion technology, Vol. 1. Marcel Dekker, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  116. Teckentrup A, Pahl MH (1996) Querstromfiltration von Emulsionen mit unterschiedlichen Tropfenverteilungen. Chem Ing Tech 68:279–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. The World Bank Group (1999) Pollution prevention and abatement handbook. The World Bank, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  118. Tomaszewska M, Orecki A, Karakulski K (2005) Treatment of bilge water using a combination of ultrafiltration and reverse osmosis. Desalination 185:203–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. U.S. EPA Method 1664, Revision A (1999) N-hexane extractable material (HEM; oil and grease) and silica gel treated n-hexane extractable material (SGTHEM; non-polar material) by extraction and gravimetry. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  120. Van der Gast CJ, Thompson IP (2004) Effects of pH amendment on metal working fluid wastewater biological treatment using a defined bacterial consortium. Biotechnol Bioeng 89:357–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Viraraghavan T, Mathavan GN (1990) Treatment of oily waters using peat. Water Pollut Res J Can 25:73–90Google Scholar
  122. Von Mylius U (1992) Membrane filtration processes in treatment and recycling of metal finishing waste waters. Recents Prog Genie Procedes 21:283–287Google Scholar
  123. Vrablik ER (1959) Fundamental principles of dissolved air flotation of industrial wastes. Proc 14th Purdue Ind Waste Conf 14:743–779Google Scholar
  124. Wiacek A, Chibowski E (1999) Zeta potential, effective diameter and multimodal size distribution in oil/water emulsion. Colloid Surf A-Physicochem Eng Asp 159:253–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Yang B, Chang Q, He C, Zhang Y (2007) Wettability study of mineral wastewater treatment filter media. Chem Eng Process 46:975–981Google Scholar
  126. Zhang H, Fang S, Ye C, Wang M, Cheng H, Wen H, Meng X (2008) Treatment of waste filature oil/water emulsion by combined demulsification and reverse osmosis. Sep Purif Technol 63:264–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Zhang J, Liu R, Sheng Z (1994) Study on effluent demulsification and biotreatment. Shanghai Huanjing Kexue 13:20–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Zimmerman JB, Clarens AF, Hayes KF, Skerlos SJ (2003) Design of hard water stable emulsifier systems for petroleum- and bio-based semi-synthetic metalworking fluids. Environ Sci Technol 37:5278–5288CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemical Engineering and Environmental TechnologyUniversity of OviedoOviedoSPAIN
  2. 2.Department of Chemical EngineeringUniversity of BurgosBurgosSPAIN

Personalised recommendations