School Dropout and Completion: An International Perspective

  • Stephen Lamb
  • Eifred Markussen
Chapter

Abstract

In most OECD countries, graduation from secondary school is now viewed as the minimum level of educational attainment needed for successful participation of young people in further study and work. This is because in most nations, secondary education serves as the foundation for entry to university and other education and training opportunities as well as preparation for entry into the labour market. Over time, it has become more and more important in deciding how economic and other life benefits, such as good health and well-being, are distributed. Despite this, in some countries, the numbers of young people leaving school without completing a relevant upper secondary qualification can be quite large. Even in nations where the numbers appear small, this does not guarantee that education systems have met all of the challenges in adequately equipping every graduate with the basic skills and knowledge necessary to take advantage of the full range of education and labour market opportunities.

Keywords

Labour Market Young People Secondary Education Completion Rate High School Diploma 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Applied Research Branch, Human Development Council Canada. (2001). Dropping out of high school: Definitions and costs. Quebec, Canada: Human Resources Development Council Canada.Google Scholar
  2. Barro, R. J. (1997). Determinants of economic growth: A cross-country empirical study. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  3. Behrman, J., & Stacey, N. (Eds.). (1997). The social benefits of education. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  4. Benavot, A. (2006). The diversification of secondary education: School curricula in comparative perspective. Revista de Currículum y Formación del Profesorado, 10(1), 1–26.Google Scholar
  5. Blossfeld, H.-P., & Shavit, Y. (1993). Persisting barriers: Changes in educational opportunities in thirteen countries. In Y. Shavit & H.-P. Blossfeld (Eds.), Persistent inequalities: A comparative study of educational attainment in thirteen countries (pp. 1–24). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction. A social critique of the judgement of taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Cameron, S. V., & Heckman, J. (1993, January). The nonequivalence of high school equivalents. Journal of Labour Economics, 11(1), 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Collins, R. (1979). Functional and conflict theories of educational stratification. In J. Karabel & A. H. Halsey (Eds.), Power and ideology in education (pp. 118–136). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Furlong, A. (2007). Supporting the transitions of vulnerable youth: UK perspectives (The Japan Institute for Labour Policy Training Report No. 5). Transition support policy for young people with low educational background (pp. 77–90). Tokyo: The Japan Institute for Labour Policy and Training.Google Scholar
  10. Goldin, C. (2001). The human capital century and American leadership: Virtues of the past. Journal of Economic History, 61(2), 263–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Grøgaard, J. B. (1992). Skomaker, bli ved din lest [Shoemaker, tick to your last]. Oslo, Norway: Fafo.Google Scholar
  12. Hanushek, E. (2005, August). The economics of school quality. German Economic Review, 6(3), 269–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Heckman, J., & LaFontaine, P. (2006). Bias corrected estimates of GED returns (NBER Working Paper No. 12018). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economics Research.Google Scholar
  14. Laird, J., DeBell, M., & Chapman, C. (2006). Dropout rates in the United States: 2004 (NCES 2007–024). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved February 2, 2009, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch
  15. Lamb, S., & Mason, K.. (2008). How young people are faring, 2008. Melbourne, Australia: Foundation for Young Australians.Google Scholar
  16. Lamb, S., Walstab, A., Teese, R., Vickers, M., & Rumberger, R. (2004). Staying on at school: Improving student retention in Australia. Brisbane, Australia: Ministerial Council on Employment, Education and Training and Queensland Department of Education. Retrieved from www.mceetya.edu.au/verve/_resources/studentretention_main_file.pdf
  17. Levin, H., Belfield, C., Muennig, P., & Rouse, C. (2007). The costs and benefits of an excellent education for all of America’s children. New York: Center for Benefit-Cost Studies of Education, Teachers College, Columbia University. Retrieved from www.cbcse.org/media/download_gallery/ Leeds_Report_Final_Jan2007.pdf
  18. Markussen, E., Frøseth, M. W., Lødding, B., & Sandberg, N. (2008). Bortvalg og kompetanse. Gjennomføring, bortvalg og kompetanseoppnåelse i videregående opplæring blant 9749 ungdommer som gikk ut av grunnskolen på østlandet våren 2002: hovedfunn, konklusjoner og implikasjoner fem år etter [Early leaving, non-completion or completion? On completion, dropout and achievement of qualification in upper secondary education among 9749 young people that left lower secondary in the spring of 2002] (Report 13). Oslo, Norway: NIFU STEP.Google Scholar
  19. Müller, D. K., Ringer, F., & Simon, B. (1987). The rise of the modern educational system: Structural change and social reproduction, 1870–1920. Cambridge, UK/Paris: Cambridge University Press/Maison des Sciences de l’Homme.Google Scholar
  20. National Center on Education and the Economy (NCEE). (2007). Tough choices, tough times. The report of the new commission on the skills of the American workforce. Washington, DC: NCEE. Retrieved from www.skillscommission.org/pdf/exec_sum/ToughChoices_EXECSUM.pdf
  21. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2001). Transition from initial education to working life. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  22. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2006). Education at a glance: OECD indicators 2006. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  23. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2008a). Education at a glance: OECD indicators 2008. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  24. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2008b). Employment outlook 2008. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  25. Owens, J. (2004). A review of the social and non-market returns to education. Wales, UK: Education and Learning Network.Google Scholar
  26. Raffe, D. (2010). Participation in post-compulsory learning in Scotland. In S. Lamb, E. Markussen, R. Teese, N. Sandberg, & J. Polesel (Eds.), School dropout and completion: International comparative studies in theory and policy. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  27. Rumberger, R., & Lim, S. (2008). Why students drop out of school: A review of 25 years of research (Report No. 15, California Dropout Research Project). Santa Barbara, CA: UCSB. Retrieved from http://cdrp.ucsb.edu/dropouts/pubs_reports.htm
  28. Rumberger, R. W. (1987). High school dropouts: A review of issues and evidence. Review of Educational Research, 57, 101–121.Google Scholar
  29. Rumberger, R. W., & Lamb, S. (2003). The early employment and further education experiences of high school dropouts: A comparative study of the United States and Australia. Economics of Education Review, 22(4), 353–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shavit, Y., & Muller, W. (1998). From school to work: A comparative study of educational qualifications and occupational destinations. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  31. Statistics Norway. (2009). Starts in vocational studies, general education completion. Kongsvinger, Norway: SSB. Retrieved from http://www.ssb.no/english/subjects/04/02/30/vgogjen_en/
  32. Traag, T., & van de Velden, R. (2008). Early school-leaving in the Netherlands. Netherlands: Maastricht University, Research Centre for Education and the Labour Market. Retrieved from http://www.roa.unimaas.nl/pdf_publications/2008/ROA_RM_2008_3.pdf
  33. Trow, M. (1977). The second transformation of the American school system. In J. Karabel & A. H. Halsey (Eds.), Power and ideology in education (pp. 105–118). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Van Es, W. (2008). Unqualified school leavers in nine European cities: A short analysis of measures. Paper prepared for Sardes, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  35. Willms, J. D. (2004). What can we say about the quality and equality of educational systems from the first cycle of PISA? Education Journal, 32(1), 161–175.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephen Lamb
    • 1
  • Eifred Markussen
    • 2
  1. 1.Centre for Post-Compulsory Education and Lifelong LearningUniversity of MelbourneParkvilleAustralia
  2. 2.NIFU Nordic Institute for Studies in InnovationResearch and EducationOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations