Advertisement

A Theistic Model of Physical Temporality

  • Anthony P. StoneEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Analecta Husserliana book series (ANHU, volume 107)

Abstract

Experience suggests that any form of time is an advancing sequence of states of affairs, which is ordered but not necessarily measured. The observed temporality of the universe is attributed to the divine life. Time in God is taken to be unmeasured. The model postulates a program running in God’s time and represented by a black box, which produces a temporal universe chosen from the tree of actualizable worlds. Physical time is then a totally ordered independent variable for physical processes, with its measures derived from these processes. As usual, physical theories are regarded as more particular models of the resulting temporal universe. The theistic model is applied to relativity, quantum mechanics, philosophy, and theology. To avoid speculation, God’s time is further described by intervals of unknown internal structure. With God’s time in the background, there is a conceptual integration of God and the universe.

Keywords

Theistic Model Actualizable World Physical World Physical Time Spacelike Hypersurface 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Danto, Arthur and Sidney Morgenbesser. 1967. Philosophy of science. Cleveland: World Publishing Company, Meridian Books, 7th printing, 322.Google Scholar
  2. Donne, John. 1624. Meditation XIV, http://www.online-literature.com/donne/406 (accessed July 29, 2009).
  3. Feynman, R.P. 1961. Quantum electrodynamics. New York: W. A. Benjamin, 68.Google Scholar
  4. Feynman, R.P. 1949. The theory of positrons. Physical Review 76(6): 749–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fraser, J.T., F.C. Haber, and G.H. Müller, eds. 1972. The study of time. Proceedings of the first conference of the International Society for the Study of Time, Oberwolfach (Black Forest) – West Germany. Berlin: Springer, 320.Google Scholar
  6. McGrath, A.E. 2002. A scientific theology, vol. 2. Edinburgh: T & T Clark, 268–279.Google Scholar
  7. Newton, Isaac. 1934. Scholium to the definitions in Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica, Bk. 1 (1689); trans. Andrew Motte (1729), rev. Florian Cajori. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  8. Pennings, T.J. 1993. Infinity and the absolute: insights into our world, our faith, and ourselves. Christian Scholars Review 23(2): 159–180.Google Scholar
  9. Prior, A.N. 1958. The syntax of time distinctions. Franciscan Studies 18: 105–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Prior, A.N. 1967. Past, present and future. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 203–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Reichenbach, H. 1956. The direction of time. Berkeley: University of California, 268.Google Scholar
  12. Rucker, Rudy. 1995. Infinity and the mind. Boston: Birkäuser, 1982; repr. Princeton: Princeton UP.Google Scholar
  13. Russell, R.J. 1997. The God who infinitely transcends infinity. In How large is God? ed. John Marks Templeton, 137–165. Philadelphia: Templeton Foundation Press.Google Scholar
  14. Somayaji, D.A. 1971. A critical study of the ancient Hindu astronomy in the light and language of the modern. Dharwar: Karnatak University, 73.Google Scholar
  15. Steinhart, Eric C. 2009. A mathematical model of divine infinity. Theology and Science 7(3): 261–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Stone, A.P. 1997. A program model of becoming. Physics Essays 10(1): 150–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Stone, A.P. 2009. “Time,” http://homepage.ntlworld.com/stone-catend/time.htm (accessed 22 September 2009).
  18. Whitrow, G.J. 1980. The natural philosophy of time, 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 332–335.Google Scholar
  19. Wildman, Wesley J. 2004. The divine action project, 1988–2003. Theology and Science 2(1): 31–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Zinkernagel, Henrik. 2008. Did time have a beginning? International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 22(3): 237–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Theological Research and Communication InstituteNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations