Advertisement

Positive Contribution of Religion to Cosmology

  • Marián Ambrozy
Chapter
Part of the Analecta Husserliana book series (ANHU, volume 107)

Abstract

In comparison of religion and cosmology as a natural science there is a primer distinguishing feature that is different language. In this sense there exist possible compromises in usage of the common language or the usage of only one of those languages in the common communication. Even if it seems that the science and theology blend together, but in the positive sense it is not the necessary but the contingent relation. Even if there is a different answer, sometimes they can examine the same problem from their own point of view and with different competencies for the answers. The example of the common question and their mutual problem, but of course with the different answers, it is the problem of the origin of the universe. Theology of Judaism, Christianity and Islam together with several myths of Bönism and Zoroastrism explain the origination of universe by the chief intelligible entity, but on the other side cosmology explains this origin in the language that deals with the step by step destruction of interactions, formation of leptons and hadrons up to the formation of systems and planets. This language has even the limits in the form of non-extrapolation of the general theory of relativity in the space-time fields smaller than 10–33 cm and 10–43 s. Situation is complicated by the incompatibility between VTR and quantum theory. While in this situation religion and theology are able to answer the question of the origin of the universe using their own tools, the cosmology in the recent paradigm starts the way of speculations. Various theories and hypothesis try to answer it, but in the principle they are not able to find the solution by any tool. Even though the religion could find some deeper answers, the basic grounds of the answers is its’ faith in the basal claims. Transcendental theology tries to answer the questions that can not be answered by the competency, language and scientifical patterns limited cosmology. Religion shows the existence of the different world from the world of phenomena. By this means helps also scientifically oriented intellectual to create his holistic picture of world even beyond the competencies of cosmology.

Keywords

Quantum Cosmology False Vacuum Grand Unification Chaotic Inflation Physical Cosmology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Blažek, Mikuláš. 1997. Úvod do súčasnej kozmológie, Bratislava. ISBN 80-7141-170-1.Google Scholar
  2. Blažek, Mikuláš and Karol Ďurček. 2001. Filozofický a fyzikálny pohľad na kozmológiu, Bratislava. ISBN 80-7141-297-X.Google Scholar
  3. Blažek, Mikuláš and Karol Ďurček, Ľuboš Rojka. 2006. Filozofický a fyzikálny pohľad na vesmír, Bratislava. ISBN 80-224-0929-4.Google Scholar
  4. Bondy, Egon. 1995. Středověká islámská a židovská filosofie, filosofie renesace a reformace, Praha. ISBN 80-85239-30-2.Google Scholar
  5. Dirgová, Eva- Littva, Vladimír: Úvod do filozofie 1 Starovek, Ružomberok, 2007. ISBN 978-80-8084-210-9.Google Scholar
  6. Ferris, Timothy. 2005. Všetko o vesmíre, Bratislava. ISBN 80-88993-85-7.Google Scholar
  7. Gribbin, John. 2002. Pátrání po velkém třesku, Praha. ISBN 80-7249-046-X.Google Scholar
  8. Hanisko, Peter. 2009. Vývoj názorov na vznik a vývoj vesmíru. In Týždeň vedy a techniky, Ružomberok. ISBN 978-80.8084-426-4.Google Scholar
  9. Heriban, Jozef. 2007. Úvod ku Genezis. In Sväté Písmo, Trnava. ISBN 978-80-7162-652-7.Google Scholar
  10. Hrkút, Ján. 2008. Vzťah vedy a náboženstva (nezávislosť). In Vzťah vedy a náboženstva, eds. Ladislav Kvasz and Eugen Zeleňák, Ružomberok. 2006. ISBN 978-80-8084-349-6.Google Scholar
  11. Hruškovič, Ivan. 1997. Islamský právny systém a proces jeho formovania, Bratislava. ISBN 80-7160-081.Google Scholar
  12. Jones, M.H., and R.J.A. Lambourne, eds. 2003. An introduction to galaxies and cosmology. Cambridge: The Open University, Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0 521 837383.Google Scholar
  13. Korán, Praha. Odeon. 1991, ISBN 80-207-0444-2.Google Scholar
  14. Mlynarčík, Peter. 2008. Filozofické aspekty Božieho pôsobenia vo svete. In: Veda a náboženstvo, Bratislava. ISBN 978-80-7141-599-2.Google Scholar
  15. Poliaková, Mária. 2007. Spojitosť a kauzalita konfliktov Západu so svetom islamu In: Theologos 1/2007, Prešov. ISSN 1335-5570.Google Scholar
  16. Sarka, Robert. 2008. Porovnanie vedy a teológie. In Vzťah vedy a náboženstva, eds. Ladislav Kvasz and Eugen Zeleňák, Ružomberok. ISBN 978-80-8084-349-6.Google Scholar
  17. Sarka, Robert. 2008. Veda a teológia ako spojenci. In Vzťah vedy a náboženstva, eds. Ladislav Kvasz and Eugen Zeleňák, Ružomberok. ISBN 978-80-8084-349-6.Google Scholar
  18. Sviderskij, I.B. 1956. Filosofskoe značenie prostranstvo- vremennych predstavlenij vo fyzike, Leningrad, M-56922.Google Scholar
  19. Tursunov, Akbar. 1980. Filozofia a súčasná kozmológia, Bratislava, 75-075-80.Google Scholar
  20. Viceník, Jozef. 1981. Thomas S. Kuhn a jeho koncepcia vývinu vedy. In Štruktúra vedeckých revolúcií, ed. T.S. Kuhn, Bratislava.Google Scholar
  21. Žarnovičanová, Ružena. 2008. Psychoedukácia ako jeden z intervenčných prístupov k emocionálne a sociálne narušeným v rámci inklúzie. In eds. Peter Seidler, Viera Kurincová, and Juraj Komora, Cesty k inklúzii, Nitra. ISBN 978-80-8094-446-9.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Pavol Ušák Oliva’s GymnaziumPopradEurope

Personalised recommendations