Abstract
It is often said that Copernican astronomy had a significant effect on humankind’s self-understanding by displacing us from the center of the universe. I claim that the effect was much more dramatic, but indirect – through the necessary rejection of Aristotelian physics. Humans had been understood since the late middle ages in a holistic-dualist manner: their souls were the immanent forms of their bodies. Reject Aristotelian hylomorphism in favor of the corpuscular physics of Galileo and others, and human nature had to be reconceived. Descartes retrieved a radical Platonic dualism, which, I argue, has had deleterious effects on modern western religion, and through the church, on all of western society. The good news is that now philosophy, Christian theology, and science (largely neuroscience, but not unrelated to astronomy) are together creating a new “nonreductive physicalist” account of human nature, with important implications for ethics and politics – a new cosmo-political synthesis.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Brown, Peter. 1967. Augustine of hippo: a biography. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 240
Campbell, Donald. 1974. ‘Downward causation’ in hierarchically organised systems. In Studies in the philosophy of biology: reduction and related problems, ed. F.J. Ayala , and T. Dobzhansky, 179–186. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Crick, Francis. 1994. The astonishing hypothesis: the scientific search for the soul. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 3.
Dyson, Freeman. 1979. Disturbing the universe. New York: Harper & Row, 250.
Gillman, Neil. 1997. The death of death: resurrection and immortality in Jewish thought. Woodstock: Jewish Lights Publishing.
Juarrero, Alicia. 1999. Dynamics in action: intentional behavior as a complex system. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Lash, Nicholas. 1986. Easter in ordinary: reflections on human experience and the knowledge of God. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 69.
Martin, Raymond, and John Barresi. 2006. The rise and fall of soul and self: an intellectual history of personal identity. New York: Columbia University Press, 106.
McMullin, Ernan. 1981. How should cosmology relate to theology? In The sciences and theology in the twentieth century, ed. A.R. Peacocke, 17–57; 39. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
Meyering, Theo C. 1989. Historical roots of cognitive science: the rise of a cognitive theory of perception from antiquity to the nineteenth century. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Murphy, Nancey. 2006. Bodies and souls, or spirited bodies? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Murphy, Nancey, and Warren S. Brown. 2007. Did my neurons make me do it? philosophical and neurobiological perspectives on moral responsibility and free will. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rorty, Richard. 1979. Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.
Scott, Alwyn. 2004. A brief history of nonlinear science. Revista del Nuovo Cimento 27(10–11): 1–115.
Toulmin, Stephen. 1990. Cosmopolis: the hidden agenda of modernity. New York: Free Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Murphy, N. (2011). Cosmopolis: How Astronomy Affects Philosophies of Human Nature and Religion. In: Tymieniecka, AT., Grandpierre, A. (eds) Astronomy and Civilization in the New Enlightenment. Analecta Husserliana, vol 107. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9748-4_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9748-4_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-9747-7
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-9748-4
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)