Advertisement

The Social And Spiritual Impact Of Sky Lore On Prehistoric Societies In Europe

  • Emília PásztorEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Analecta Husserliana book series (ANHU, volume 107)

Abstract

Celestial events often exerted a great or even decisive influence on the life of ancient communities. There is good evidence that these phenomena played a particularly important role in the worldview of prehistoric Europe as well. Without written records the archaeological artifacts, features are almost the only “basic material” but also the solid evidences at the same time in retracing the prehistoric sky lore and its impact. Archaeoastronomical investigations can enrich the knowledge on prehistoric cognition but the overstatement of the role of astronomy in prehistoric civilization can also result false picture. Endeavoring to keep the right balance the paper is going to set forth the recent results of archaeoastronomical research on prehistoric sky lore and its influence on societies in Central Europe.

Keywords

Carpathian Basin Ritual Activity Stone Monument Bell Beaker Standing Stone 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bertemes, F., and W. Schlosser. 2004. Der Kreisgraben von Goseck und seine astronomischen Bezüge. In Der Geschmiedete Himmel, Hg. Harald Meller, 48–51. Stuttgart: Theiss.Google Scholar
  2. Chamberlain, V.D. 1982. When stars came down to earth. Los Altos: Ballena Press.Google Scholar
  3. Dömötör, T. 1983. Naptári ünnepek-népi színjátszás. Budapest: Akadémia Kiadó.Google Scholar
  4. Eliade, M. 1957. Patterns in comparative religion. London: Sheed and Ward.Google Scholar
  5. Eliade, M. Zalmoxis. 1972. History of religion, vol.11, No. 3. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 257–303.Google Scholar
  6. Gervautz, M., and W. Neubauer. 2005. Sonne, Mond und Sterne. In Zeitreise Heldenberg. Geheimnisvolle Kreisgräben, Hg. F. Daim and W. Neubauer, 73–74. St.Pölten: Berger.Google Scholar
  7. Hoppál, M. 2007. Shamans and tradition. Budapest: Akadémia Kiadó.Google Scholar
  8. Hutton, R. 1996. The pagan religions of the ancient British isles. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  9. Jan de Vries. 1956. Altgermanische Religionsgeschichte. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  10. MacDonald, J. 1998. The Arctic sky. Toronto: Royal Ontario Museum/Nunavut Research Institute.Google Scholar
  11. Nilsson, M.P. 1920. Primitive time-reckoning. Lund: Gleerups.Google Scholar
  12. Pásztor, E. 2005. Sunshine in Bell Beaker’s houses: On the orientation of the houses of the Bell Beaker- Csepel Group. In Lights and shadows in cultural astronomy, eds. M.P. Zedda and J.A. Belmonte, 116–124. Isili: Associazione Archaeofila.Google Scholar
  13. Pásztor, E. 2008. Celestial symbols on archaeological finds from the Bronze Age in the Carpathian Basin. In Cognitive archaeology as symbolic archaeology 1737, eds. F. Coimbra and G. Dimitriadis, 13–21. Cracow: BAR IS.Google Scholar
  14. Pásztor, E. 2009a. Prehistoric cosmologies – a methodological framework for an attempt to reconstruct Bronze age cosmologic ideas in the Carpathian Basin. In: Cosmology across cultures ASP conference series, eds. J. A. Rubiño Martín, J. A. Belmonte, F. Prada, and A. Alberdi, Vol. 409, 457–463.Google Scholar
  15. Pásztor, E. 2009b. The significance of the sun, moon and celestial bodies to societies in the Carpathian Basin during the Bronze Age. In The role of astronomy in society and culture, eds. D. Valls-Gabaud and A. Boksenberg Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Pásztor, E. 2009c. The harmony of the immaterial and the material in prehistoric monuments: Investigating ancient light and shadow interaction. In Experimenting the past. The position of experimental archaeology in the archaeological paradigm of the 21st century, eds. D. Gheorghiu, and A. Peatfield, Zeta Books (In press).Google Scholar
  17. Pásztor, E. 2009d. Kognitív régészet és etnoarcheológia – Égitestek és jelenségek lehetséges ismerete a bronzkori Kárpát-medencében. In Essays to the honour of János Makkay, ed. M. Fekete. Pécs: Pécs University.Google Scholar
  18. Pásztor, E. 2009e. Prehistoric sky lore and spirituality. In Archaeology and Experimenting Spirituality? eds. D. Gheorghiu and A. Peatfield. Cracow:BAR IS.Google Scholar
  19. Pásztor, E. 2009f. A kereskedelem és csere ’mellékterméke’: eszmék és szimbólumok vándorlása. In G. Ilon (ed). VI. Őskoros konferencia, MOMOSZ. Szombathely.Google Scholar
  20. Pásztor, E. 2009 g. The connection between the terrestrial and celestial landscape during the Bronze age in the Carpathian Basin: Orientation of houses. In: Landscape in mind: Dialogue on space between anthropology and archaeology, ed. G. Dimitriadis, BAR-S2003. Oxford: Archaeopress. Chapter 9.Google Scholar
  21. Pásztor, E., and J.P. Barna. 2009. Concepts of space, place and time in late Neolithic Carpathian Basin: The geometry of rondels of the Lengyel complex. In Place as material culture, objects, geographies and the construction of time, eds. D. Gheorghiu and G. Nash. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
  22. Pásztor, E. and C. Roslund. 2007. An interpretation of the Nebra disc. Antiquity 81: 267–278.Google Scholar
  23. Pásztor, E., J.P. Barna, and C. Roslund. 2008. The orientation of rondels of the Neolithic Lengyel culture in Central Europe. Antiquity 82: 910–924.Google Scholar
  24. Pavúk, J., and V. Karlovsk\({u{y}}\). 2004. Orientacia Rondelov Lengyelskej Kultúry na Smery Vysokého a Nízkeho Mesiaca. Slov. Arch. LII-2: 211–280.Google Scholar
  25. Ruggles, C. 1999. Astronomy in prehistoric Britain and Ireland. New Haven, London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Zotti, G. 2005. Kalendarbauten? – Zur astronomischen Ausrichtung der Kreisgrabenanlagen in Niederösterreich. In Zeitreise Heldenberg. Geheimnisvolle Kreigräben, Hg. F. Daim and W. Neubauer, 75–79. St.Pölten: Niederösterreichische Landesmuseum.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.SEAC, Europé Research Group for Meditterranean and Carpathian Basin StudiesDunafoldvarHungary

Personalised recommendations