Transcendental Idealism in the Third Critique
Kant’s assertions about things in themselves in the Critique of Pure Reason are notoriously difficult to understand and indeed to reconcile with one another. The fundamental claim of transcendental idealism is that our experience and knowledge are necessarily shaped by the forms of our intuition (space and time) and ordered by the pure concepts of the understanding (categories). This claim naturally leads to its contrast with philosophical views that assume that we have knowledge of things as they are in themselves. For such viewpoints, true knowledge is knowledge of how things are quite independently of our minds.
KeywordsNatural Kind Empirical Experience Spatial Form Pure Reason Aesthetic Judgment
I am deeply indebted to Aviv Reiter, Nir Friedman, Dennis Schulting and Yaron Senderowicz for their comments on this paper.
- Brandt, R. 1989. ‘The Deductions in the Critique of Judgment: Comments on Hampshire and Horstmann’. In E. Förster (ed.), Kant’s Transcendental Deductions: The Three Critiques and the Opus Postumum. Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 177–190.Google Scholar
- Ginsborg, H. 1997. ‘Lawfulness Without a Law: Kant on the Free Play of Imagination’. Philosophical Studies 25: 37–81.Google Scholar
- Ginsborg, H. 1998. ‘Kant on the Subjectivity of Taste’. In H. Parret (ed.), Kants Ästhetik – Kant’s Aesthetics – L’esthétique de Kant. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter, pp. 448–465.Google Scholar
- Guyer, P. 1997. Kant and the Claims of Taste. 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Guyer, P. 2006. ‘The Harmony of the Faculties Revisited’. In R. Kukla (ed.), Aesthetics and Cognition in Kant’s Critical Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 162–193.Google Scholar
- Henrich, D. 1992. ‘Kant’s Explanation of Aesthetic Judgment’. In D. Henrich, Aesthetic Judgment and the Moral Image of the World: Studies in Kant. Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 29–56.Google Scholar
- Kant, I. 1997. Critique of Pure Reason. Trans. and ed. P. Guyer and A. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Kant, I. 2000. Critique of the Power of Judgment. Ed. P. Guyer and trans. P. Guyer and E. Matthews. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Wicks, R. 2007. Kant on Judgment. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar