The Development of Conceptions of Personal Autonomy, Rights, and Democracy, and Their Relation to Psychological Well-Being

Chapter
Part of the Cross-Cultural Advancements in Positive Psychology book series (CAPP, volume 1)

Abstract

Children in a variety of cultural contexts have been shown to develop concerns with personal autonomy and rights, and these conceptions not only place limits on the forms of social organization seen as legitimate but also have relevance for children’s psychological well-being, consistent with self-determination theory. Although many current psychological theories relegate freedoms, rights, and democracy to products of Western intellectual traditions or cultural settings, a body of new and emerging psychological evidence, conducted in a variety of cultural settings, both Eastern and Western, and from a variety of theoretical perspectives, including self-determination theory, suggests otherwise. Areas of personal jurisdiction, choice, and participation are claimed by children and adolescents themselves as they develop explicit conceptions of their own autonomy and reflect on the different types of social rules and structures that they experience in their daily lives. These conceptions of autonomy and democracy have been shown to have functional significance for the realization of individuals’ psychological well-being in diverse cultural settings.

Keywords

School Climate Cultural Setting Personal Autonomy Personal Choice Chinese Adolescent 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Ardilla-Rey, A., & Killen, M. (2001). Middle-class Colombian children’s evaluations of personal, moral, and social conventional interactions in the classroom. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 25, 246–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barber, B. K., Stolz, H. E., & Olsen, J. A. (2005). Parental support, psychological control, and behavioral control: Assessing relevance across time, culture, and method. Monographs of the Society of Research in Child Development, 70, 1–137.Google Scholar
  3. Cherney, I. D., & Shing, Y. L. (2008). Children’s nurturance and self-determination rights: A cross-cultural perspective. Journal of Social Issues, 64, 835–856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chirkov, V. I. (2007). Culture, personal autonomy, and individualism: Their relationships and implications for personal growth and well-being. In G. Zheng, K. Leung, & J. G. Adair (Eds.), Perspectives and progress in contemporary cross-cultural psychology (pp. 247–263). Beijing: China Light Industry Press.Google Scholar
  5. Chirkov, V., Ryan, R. M., Kim, Y., & Kaplan, U. (2003). Differentiating autonomy from individualism and independence: A self-determination theory perspective on internalization of cultural orientations and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 97–109.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Conry-Murray, C. (2009). Adolescent and adult reasoning about gender and fairness in traditional practices in Benin, West Africa. Social Development, 18, 427–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Covell, K., McNeil, J., & Howe, B. R. (2009). Reducing teacher burnout by increasing student engagement: A children’s rights approach. School Psychology International, 30, 282–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Darling, N., Cumsille, P., & Pena-Alampay, L. (2005). Rules, legitimacy of parental authority, and obligation to obey in Chile, the Philippines, and the United States. In J. G. Smetana (Ed.), Changing boundaries of parental authority during adolescence: New directions for child and adolescent development (Vol. 108, pp. 47–60). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  9. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology, 49, 182–185.Google Scholar
  10. Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  11. Dworkin, R. A. (1977). Taking rights seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Gewirth, A. (1978). Reason and morality. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  13. Greenfield, P. M., Keller, H., Fuligni, A., & Maynard, A. (2003). Cultural pathways through universal development. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 461–490.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Hart, D., Atkins, R., & Donnelly, T. M. (2006). Community service and moral development. In M. Killen, & J. Smetana (Eds.), Handbook of moral development. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  15. Hasebe, Y., Nucci, L., & Nucci, M. S. (2004). Parental control of the personal domain and adolescent symptoms of psychopathology: A cross-national study in the United States and Japan. Child Development, 75, 815–828.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Heinrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 61–83.Google Scholar
  17. Helwig, C. C. (1995). Adolescents’ and young adults’ conceptions of civil liberties: Freedom of speech and religion. Child Development, 66, 152–166.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Helwig, C. C. (1998). Children’s conceptions of fair government and freedom of speech. Child Development, 69, 518–531.Google Scholar
  19. Helwig, C. C. (2005). Culture and the construction of concepts of personal autonomy and democratic decision making. In J. E. Jacobs & P. A. Klazynski (Eds.), The development of judgement and decision making in children and adolescents. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  20. Helwig, C. (2006). The development of personal autonomy throughout cultures. Cognitive Development, 21, 458–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Helwig, C. C., Arnold, M. L., Tan, D., & Boyd, D. (2003). Chinese adolescents’ reasoning about democratic and authority-based decision making in peer, family, and school contexts. Child Development, 74, 783–800.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Helwig, C. C., Arnold, M. L., Tan, D., & Boyd, D. (2007). Mainland Chinese and Canadian adolescents’ judgments and reasoning about the fairness of democratic and other forms of government. Cognitive Development, 22, 96–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Helwig, C. C., & Kim, S. (1999). Children’s evaluations of decision-making procedures in peer, family, and school contexts. Child Development, 70, 502–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Helwig, C. C., Yang, S., Nucci, L. P., & To, S. (2009, April). Parental control of the personal domain and adolescent symptoms of psychopathology in urban and rural China. Poster presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Denver.Google Scholar
  25. Helwig, C. C., Yang, S., Tan, D., Liu, C., & Shao, T. (in press). Urban and rural Chinese adolescents’ judgments and reasoning about personal and group jurisdiction. Child Development.Google Scholar
  26. Jia, Y., Way, N., Ling, G., Yoshikawa, H., Chen, X., Hughes, D., et al. (2009). The influence of student perceptions of school climate on socioemotional and academic adjustment: A comparison of Chinese and American adolescents. Child Development, 80, 1514–1530.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Kagitcibasi, C. (2005). Autonomy and relatedness in cultural context: Implications for self and family. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36, 403–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kim, J. M., & Turiel, E. (1996). Korean and American children’s concepts of adult and peer authority. Social Development, 5, 310–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kinoshita, Y. (2006). Children’s judgment of the legitimacy of group decision making about individual concerns: A comparative study between England and Japan. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 30, 117–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lagatutta, K. H., Nucci, L., & Bosacki, S. L. (2010). Bridging theory of mind and the personal domain: Children’s reasoning about resistance to parental control. Child Development, 81, 616–635.Google Scholar
  31. Lahat, A., Helwig, C. C., Yang, S., Tan, D., & Liu, C. (2009). Mainland Chinese adolescents’ judgements and reasoning about self-determination and nurturance rights. Social Development, 18, 690–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Larmore, C. (2008). The autonomy of morality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Markus, H. R. (2008). Pride, prejudice and ambivalence: Toward a unified theory of race and ethnicity. American Psychologist, 63, 651–670.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Markus, H., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and self: Implications for cognition, emotion and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Miller, J. G. (1994). Cultural diversity in the morality of caring: Individually oriented versus duty-based interpersonal moral codes. Cross-Cultural Research: The Journal of Comparative Social Science, 28(1), 3–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Moessinger, P. (1981). The development of the concept of majority decision: A pilot study. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 13, 359–362.Google Scholar
  37. Neff, K. D. (2001). Judgments of personal autonomy and interpersonal responsibility in the context of Indian spousal relationships: An examination of young people’s reasoning in Mysore, India. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 19, 233–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nucci, L. P. (1981). The development of personal concepts: A domain distinct from moral and social concepts. Child Development, 52, 114–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nucci, L. P. (2001). Education in the moral domain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nucci, L. P., Camino, C., & Sapiro, C. (1996). Social class effects on northeastern Brazilian children’s conceptions of areas of personal choice and social regulation. Child Development, 67, 1223–1242.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Nucci, L. P., & Weber, E. (1995). Social interactions in the home and the development of young children’s conceptions within the personal domain. Child Development, 66, 1438–1452.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Nussbaum, L. C. (2000). Women and human development: The capabilities approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Piaget, J. (1932). The moral judgment of the child. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  44. Qin, L., Pomerantz, E. M., & Wang, Q. (2009). Are gains in decision-making autonomy during early adolescence beneficial for emotional functioning? The case of the United States and China. Child Development, 80, 1705–1721.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Roth, G., & Deci, E. L. (2009). Autonomy. In S. J. Lopez (Ed.), Encyclopedia of positive psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 78–82). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  47. Ruck, M. D., Abramovitch, R., & Keating, D. P. (1998). Children’s and adolescents’ understanding of rights: Balancing nurturance and self-determination. Child Development, 69, 404–417.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potential: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141–166.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Shweder, R. A. (2003). Why do men barbecue? Recipes for cultural psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Shweder, R. A., Mahapatra, M., & Miller, J. G. (1987). Culture and moral development. In J. Kagan & S. Lamb (Eds.), The emergence of morality in young children (pp. 1–82). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  52. Smetana, J. G. (1988). Adolescents’ and parents’ conceptions of parental authority. Child Development, 59, 321–335.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Smetana, J. G. (1989). Adolescents’ and parents’ reasoning about actual family conflict. Child Development, 60, 1052–1067.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Smetana, J. G. (2005). Adolescent-parent conflict: Resistance and subversion as developmental process. In L. Nucci (Ed.), Conflict, contradiction, and contrarian elements in moral development and education (pp. 69–91). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  55. Smetana, J. G. (2006). Social-cognitive domain theory. In M. Killen & J. G. Smetana (Eds.), Handbook of moral development (pp. 119–153). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  56. Triandis, H. C. (1989). The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 96, 506–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Turiel, E. (2006). The development of morality. In W. Damon, R. M. Lerner, & N. Eisenberg (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (6th ed., pp. 789–857). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  58. Turiel, E., & Wainryb, C. (1998). Concepts of freedoms and rights in a traditional, hierarchically organized society. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 16, 375–394.Google Scholar
  59. Verkuyten, M., & Slooter, L. (2008). Muslim and non-Muslim adolescents’ reasoning about freedom of speech and minority rights. Child Development, 79, 514–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wainryb, C., & Turiel, E. (1994). Dominance, subordination, and concepts of personal entitlements in cultural contexts. Child Development, 65, 1701–1722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Way, N., Reddy, R., & Rhodes, J. (2007). Students’ perceptions of school climate during the middle school years: Associations with trajectories of psychological and behavioral adjustment. American Journal of Community Psychology, 40, 194–213.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Yamada, H. (2009). Japanese children’s reasoning about conflicts with parents. Social Development, 18, 962–977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Yau, J., & Smetana, J. G. (2003a). Conceptions of moral, social-conventional, and personal events among Chinese preschoolers in Hong Kong. Child Development, 74, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Yau, J., & Smetana, J. G. (2003b). Adolescent-parent conflict in Hong Kong and Shenzhen: A comparison of youth in two cultural contexts. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 27, 201–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Youniss, J., & Yates, M. (1997). Community service and social responsibility in youth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations