Effect of Material Constituents and Mix Design on Performance of SCC for Precast, Prestressed Girders

  • Guillaume Lemieux
  • Soo-Duck Hwang
  • Kamal H. Khayat
Conference paper
Part of the RILEM Bookseries book series (RILEM, volume 1)

Abstract

An extensive investigation was undertaken to evaluate the influence of binder type, water-to-cementitious materials ratio (w/cm), type of coarse aggregate, and maximum size of aggregate (MSA) on workability and strength development of self-consolidating concrete (SCC) designated for precast, prestressed bridge girders. In total, 30 SCC mixtures were investigated. In total, 24 mixtures were non air-entrained and were prepared using crushed aggregate or gravel with three MSA of 10, 14, and 20 mm. The w/cm was set to a relatively low value of 0.33 and a higher value of 0.38. Three different binder compositions were investigated. The effect of slump flow consistency on performance was also investigated. Test results indicate that SCC made with the higher w/cm exhibited superior fluidity retention, passing ability, and filling capacity. Mixtures proportioned with the lower w/cm developed greater stability. Mixtures made with the crushed aggregate of 10 mm MSA exhibited greater passing ability, higher filling capacity, and better retention of air content than similar SCC prepared with 14 and 20 mm MSA. Mixtures proportioned with the gravel had superior passing ability, filling capacity and similar stability compared to those made with crushed aggregate of the same MSA.

Keywords

Compressive Strength Coarse Aggregate Slump Flow Steam Cure Crushed Aggregate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    AASHTO (1998), AASHTO LRFD bridge design specification, 2nd edition. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Petersson. O. et al. (1996), A model for self-compacting concrete. Proceeding of International RILEM Conference on Production Methods and Workability of Concrete, Paisley, pp. 489–490.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yurugi, M. et al. (1993), Mix proportion of highly workable concrete, Proceeding of Concrete 2000, Dundee, Scotland, pp. 579–589.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Khayat, K.H. (1999), Workability, testing, and performance of self-consolidating concrete, ACI Materials Journal, vol. 96, n. 3, pp. 346–353.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Khayat, K.H. and Mitchell, D. (2008), National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) 18-12 Project, Self-consolidating concrete for precast, prestressed concrete bridge elements. Final report.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© RILEM 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Guillaume Lemieux
    • 1
  • Soo-Duck Hwang
    • 2
  • Kamal H. Khayat
    • 2
  1. 1.The Euclid Chemical CompanySt-HunertCanada
  2. 2.Université de SherbrookeSherbrookeCanada

Personalised recommendations