Drying Shrinkage of SCC – Influence of the Composition of Ternary Composite Cements

  • Hedda Vikan
  • Tor Arne Hammer
  • Knut O. Kjellsen
Conference paper
Part of the RILEM Bookseries book series (RILEM, volume 1)

Abstract

There is an increasing interest of developing and using composite cements, e.g. to reduce CO2-emmissions in cement production. This paper discusses results from an investigation of the influence of composition of ternary composite cements on the drying shrinkage of a typical low cost SCC for buildings (w/cm = 0.55) as used in Norway. Various Portland cements (CEM I), Portland fly ash cements (CEM II/A-V), Portland limestone cements (CEM II/A-L) and a Portland-composite cement (CEM II/B-M) were tested. The fineness of clinker phase, fly ash and limestone were varied systematically in the cements. Shrinkage was determined from length measurements of 500 mm long prisms, 100 x 100 mm in cross section, stored in water from demoulding until 7 days of age and then at 50% RH until 12 months of age. As expected, increased fineness and early reactivity of the cements increased shrinkage. The results showed, however, that the drying shrinkage was not significantly affected by the cement type. I.e. replacing up to 35% of the clinker by fly ash and limestone did not influence the drying shrinkage.

Keywords

Compressive Strength Portland Cement Composite Cement Blended Cement Autogenous Shrinkage 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Justnes, H. (2007), Principles of making cement with reduced CO2 emission – State of the art, SINTEF Report, ISBN 978-82-536-0982-9, downloadable from www.coinweb.no.
  2. 2.
    Ronbing, B. and Jian, S. (2005), Synthesis and evaluation of shrinkage-reducing admixture for cementitious materials, Cem. Concr. Res., vol. 35 pp. 445–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Taylor, H.F.W. (1990), Cement Chemistry, Academic Press Limited, London, pp. 270–272.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bentz, D. (2005), Curing with shrinkage-reducing admixtures, Concrete International, October, pp. 55–60.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Neville, A.M. (1995), Properties of Concrete, 4th Ed. Pearson Education Limited, Essex, England.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brooks, J.J. and Jiang, X. (1997), The influence of chemical admixtures on restrained drying shrinkage of concrete, Fifth CANMET/ACI Conference on Superplasticizers and Other Chemical Admixtures in Concrete, Rome, pp. 249–266.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jianyong L. and Yan, Y. (2001), A study on creep and drying shrinkage of high performance concrete, Cem. Concr. Res., vol. 31, pp. 1203–1206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    De Schutter, G., Bartos, P.J.M., Domone, P. and Gibbs, J. (2008), Self-Compacting Concrete, Whittles Publishing, Scotland, p. 200.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    ACI 209.1R-05, Report on Factors Affecting Shrinkage and Creep of Hardened Concrete.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vikan, H., Justnes, H., Winnefeld, F. and Figi, R. (2007), Correlating cement characteristics with rheology of paste, Cem. Concr. Res., vol. 37, pp. 1502–1511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Brooks, J.J. (1999), How admixtures affect shrinkage and creep, Concr. Int., vol. 21, pp. 35–38.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© RILEM 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hedda Vikan
    • 1
  • Tor Arne Hammer
    • 1
  • Knut O. Kjellsen
    • 2
  1. 1.COIN - Concrete Innovation CentreSINTEF Building and InfrastructureOsloNorway
  2. 2.Norcem ASHeidelberg Cement GroupBrevikNorway

Personalised recommendations