Skip to main content

Three Crucial Turns on the Road to an Adequate Understanding of Human Dignity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Humiliation, Degradation, Dehumanization

Part of the book series: Library of Ethics and Applied Philosophy ((LOET,volume 24))

Abstract

Human dignity is one of the key concepts of our ethical evaluations, in politics, in biomedicine, as well as in everyday life. In moral philosophy, however, human dignity is a source of intractable trouble. It has a number of characteristic features which apparently do not fit into one coherent ethical concept. Hence, philosophers tend to ignore or circumvent the concept. There is hope for a philosophically attractive conception of human dignity, however, given that one takes three crucial turns. The negative turn: to start the inquiry with violations of human dignity. The inductive turn: to consider the whole range of applications of the concept of human dignity in different areas of ethics. And finally, the historical turn: to take into account the historical bonds between human dignity and traditional conceptions of dignity. Taken together they point in the direction of an understanding of human dignity as universal nobility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Dignity also played an important (but presumably different) part in the Gospels, when Jesus repeatedly exposed himself to situations that were considered as deeply undignified and humiliating.

  2. 2.

    For a profound presentation, see Von der Pfordten (2006).

  3. 3.

    The translation is taken from the Gutenberg Project: http://www.gutenberg.org/dirs/etext00/corii10.txt (2.8.2009), my emphasis.

  4. 4.

    I want to thank the editors of this volume not only for their patience but primarily for their numerous helpful suggestions and remarks that have definitely improved whatever quality there is in this paper.

References

  • Agich, George J. 2007. Reflections on the function of dignity in the context of caring for old people. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 32(5): 483–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Améry, Jean. 1977. Jenseits von Schuld und Sühne: Bewältigungsversuche eines Ãœberwältigten. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, Tom L., and James F. Childress. 2009. Principles of biomedical ethics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birnbacher, Dieter. 2004. Menschenwürde – abwägbar oder unabwägbar? In Biomedizin und Menschenwürde, ed. Matthias Kettner. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burckhardt, Jacob, and Horst Günther. 1989. Die Kultur der Renaissance in Italien. Frankfurt/Main: Deutscher Klassiker Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damschen, Gregor, and Dieter Schönecker. 2003. Der moralische Status menschlicher Embryonen: Pro und contra Spezies-, Kontinuums-, Identitäts- und Potentialitätsargument. New York, NY: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Des Pres, Terrence. 1976. The survivor: An anatomy of life in the death camps. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, Ronald. 1993. Life’s dominion – An argument about abortion and euthanasia. Hammersmith: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, Lise-Lotte, Britt-Marie Ternestedt, and Lennart Nordenfelt. 2006. Views on dignity of elderly nursing home residents. Nursing Ethics 13(2): 130–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, Raymond G., and Christopher Heath Wellman. 2003. A companion to applied ethics. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelernter, David. 2008. The religious character of human dignity. In Human dignity and bioethics, ed. President’s Council on Bioethics, 387–405. Washington, DC: President’s Council on Bioethics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gewirth, Alan. 1992. Human dignity as the basis of rights. In The constitution of rights – Human dignity and american values, eds. Michael J. Meyer and William Parent. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, Erving. 1963. Stigma. Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen. 2001. Die Zukunft der menschlichen Natur. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaFollette, Hugh. 2003. The Oxford handbook of practical ethics. Oxford and New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, Niklas. 1965. Grundrechte als Institution. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margalit, Avishai. 1996. The decent society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, Martha Craven. 2006. Frontiers of justice: Disability, nationality, species membership, the tanner lectures on human values. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pöschl, Viktor. 1989. Der Begriff der Würde im antiken Rom und später. Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitätsverlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, Rosamond, Leslie Francis, and Anita Silvers. 2007. The Blackwell guide to medical ethics. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schiller, Friedrich. 2005. Don Carlos. Stuttgart: Reclam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulman, Adam. 2008. Bioethics and the question of human dignity. In Human dignity and bioethics, ed. President’s Council on Bioethics, 3–18. Washington, DC: President’s Council on Bioethics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silver, Maury et al. 1986. Humiliation: Feeling, social control and the construction of identity. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 16(3): 269–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spaemann, Robert. 1987 [1985]. Ãœber den Begriff der Menschenwürde. In Das Natürliche und das Vernünftige, 77–106. München: Piper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stepanians, Markus. 2003. Gleiche Würde, gleiche Rechte. In Menschenwürde – Annäherung an einen Begriff, ed. Ralf Stoecker, 81–103. Wien: Öbv & Hpt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoecker, Ralf. 2003. Menschenwürde und das Paradox der Entwürdigung. In Menschenwürde – Annäherung an einen Begriff, ed. Ralf Stoecker, 133–151. Wien: Öbv & Hpt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Temsch, Jochen. 1994. Das wird schon wieder. Die Zeit 25(11): 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vögele, Wolfgang. 2000. Menschenwürde zwischen Recht und Theologie. Gütersloh: Chr. Kaiser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von der Pfordten, Dietmar. 2006. Zur Würde des Menschen bei Kant. Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik 14: 501–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldron, Jeremy. 2007. Dignity and rank. European Journal of Sociology 48(2): 201–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ralf Stoecker .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stoecker, R. (2011). Three Crucial Turns on the Road to an Adequate Understanding of Human Dignity. In: Kaufmann, P., Kuch, H., Neuhaeuser, C., Webster, E. (eds) Humiliation, Degradation, Dehumanization. Library of Ethics and Applied Philosophy, vol 24. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9661-6_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics