Differences in Variables Influencing the Ratings of Importance and Use of Quality of Life Domains and Indicators by Polish Services Users and Their Parents

  • Wojciech Otrębski
Part of the Social Indicators Research Series book series (SINS, volume 41)


Background Interest in the concept of quality of life (QOL) as a category guiding the development and provision of services for the individuals with intellectual disabilities (ID) in Poland is constantly being observed. Its presence in rehabilitation, education and care is strongly associated with the assessment of importance and use of QOL domains and indicators by Polish service users and their parents. Method The present chapter examined the differences in selected demographic variables as related to the assessments of importance and use of eight QOL domains made by a group of Polish service users and their parents. Results The evaluations of the importance and use of eight QOL domains and their indicators were significantly related to a variety of demographic variables. More associations were observed in the group of service users than in the group of their parents. Significant differences in the perception of the QOL domains between service users and their parents were also found.


Cross-cultural quality of life survey Individuals with intellectual disability and their parents Quality of life domains 


  1. Bańka, A. (Ed.). (2005). Psychology of the quality of life. Poznań: Association Psychology & Architecture.Google Scholar
  2. Jenaro, C., Verdugo, M. A., Caballo, C., Balboni, G., Lachapelle, Y., Otrebski, W., et al. (2005). Cross-cultural study of person-centered quality of life domains and indicators: A replication. Journal on Intellectual Disability Research, 49(10), 799–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Keith, K. D., & Bonham, G. S. (2005). The use of quality of life data at the organization and systems level. Journal on Intellectual Disability Research, 49(10), 734–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Kowalik, S. (2001). Usefulness of the quality of life concept in the rehabilitation practice of disabled. In L. Wołowicka (Ed.), Quality of life in the medical sciences (pp. 54–77). Poznań: Medical Accademy Press.Google Scholar
  5. Oleś, P. (2002). The quality of life in health and sickness. In P. Oleś, S. Steuden, & J. Toczołowski (Eds.), How I can see less world. Vision impairments and quality of life (pp. 37–42). Lublin: TN KUL.Google Scholar
  6. Otrebski, W. (2000). Quality of life of people with mental retardation living in two different environments in Poland. In K. D. Keith & R. L. Schalock (Eds.), Cross-cultural perspective on quality of life (pp. 83–92). Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation.Google Scholar
  7. Otrębski, W. (2005). Variables influencing the ratings of importance and use of quality of life domains and indicators by Polish professionals. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 49(10), 750–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Schalock, R., & Verdugo, M. A. (2002). Handbook on quality of life for human service practitioners, Washington, DC: AAMR.Google Scholar
  9. Schalock, R. L. (2004). The concept of quality of life: What we know and do not know. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 48(3), 203–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Verdugo, M. A., & Schalock, R. L. (2001). Cross-cultural survey of quality of life indicators. Salamanca, Spain: Institute on Community Integration, Faculty of Psychology.Google Scholar
  11. Wołowicka L. (Ed.). (2001). Quality of life in medical sciences. Poznań: Medical Academy Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Rehabilitative PsychologyInstitute of Psychology, John Paul II Catholic University of LublinLublinPoland

Personalised recommendations