Advertisement

Surveillance on Plague in Natural Foci in Georgia

  • Lela Bakanidze
  • Paata Imnadze
  • Svetlana Chubinidze
  • Nikoloz Tsertsvadze
  • Gela Mgeladze
  • Irakli Shalutashvili
  • Shota Tsanava
  • Merab Shavishvili
  • Julietta Manvelyan
  • Nana Ninashvili
  • Guram Katsitadze
Conference paper
Part of the NATO Science for Peace and Security Series A: Chemistry and Biology book series (NAPSA, volume 00)

Abstract

Plague is one of the oldest and most devastating recorded human diseases. Several epidemics of plague have occurred in the territory of Georgia. In 1933, the Transcaucasian Anti-Plague Center was established in Tbilisi. There are two natural foci of plague in the territory of Georgia: plain–foothill and high mountainous. The Georgian Anti-Plague Station carried out active surveillance on natural foci. In the plain–foothill focus, plague epizootics were established in 1966 and in 1968–1971. In the high-mountainous focus, plague epizootics were established in 1979–1983 and in 1992–1997. A total of 122 strains of Yersinia pestis were isolated in Georgia – 83 in the plain–foothill focus and 39 in the highmountainous focus; 46 strains are kept at the National Center for Disease Control and Public Health’s Microbial Library. Although no new isolates were obtained in recent years, the plague foci in Georgia are so close to populated areas that they must be under permanent control to be able to respond rapidly to emergencies.

Keywords

Active Surveillance Common Vole Natural Focus Yersinia Pestis Francisella Tularensis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Abesadze, B., Chkheidze, G., Maskharashvili, P., Nersesov, V., Jmukhadze, I., Dzneladze, M. On natural endemicity of plague in semi-desert zone of East Georgia. Especially dangerous infections in Caucasus. Proceedings of the Second Scientific Conference of Anti-Plague Institutions of Caucasus on Epidemiology, Epizootology, and the Prevention of Especially Dangerous Infections, 1st ed. Stavropol; 1970. pp. 7–10.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pilipenko, V. Outcomes and prospective of the study of natural foci of plague in Caucasus. Especially dangerous infections. Stavropol: Russia, 1978.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Surveillance and control of communicable diseases: guidelines for public health services in Georgia. Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates Inc.; 2005.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Thacker, S.B., Parrish, R.G., Trowbridge, F.L. 1988. A method for evaluating systems of epidemiological surveillance. World Health Stat. Q. 41:11–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kukhalashvili, I. Gvelesiani, G. Archive data on plague in Georgia in XIX century. Especially dangerous infections in Caucasus. Stavropol: Russia, 1864. pp. 209–210.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nersesov, V., Tsikhistavi, Sh. Assessment of epizootic factors of focus in Southern Georgia and heightening of effectiveness of epi-surveillance. Materials of jubilee conference. Tbilisi: Georgia, 1988. pp. 23–28.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Anonymous. General instructions on the parasitological work in anti-plague institutes in the USSR. Stavropol: Russia, 1978.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Anonymous. General instructions on parasitological works: methodological guidelines. MY 3.1 1027-01, April 6, 2001.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Anonymous. Guidelines on calculating the quantity of rodents for anti-plague institutions. Stavropol: Russia, 1978.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Anonymous. Instructions on epi-surveillance in natural foci of plague in Caucasus. Stavropol: Russia, 1986.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Anonymous. Handbook of plague prevention. Saratov: Russia, 1972.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Petrov, P. Adamyan, A., Rozanova, G., et al. Current study of high mountainous focus of plague. Especially dangerous infections. Stavropol: Russia, 1984. pp. 57–58.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tsikhistavi, Sh. Problems of especially dangerous infections. Saratov: Russia, 1972. 25, pp. 69–74.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Babenshev, V., Emalianov, P., Jmukhadze, I. Ecology of Microtus arvalis in Javakheti Plateau (South Georgia). Especially dangerous infection in Caucasus. Edition 1. Stavropol: Russia, 1970. pp. 47–51.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Klimenko, I., Lobanov, T. Some peculiarities of the reflection of epizootologic process in the plain foothills focus endemic focus of South Caucasus. Especially dangerous infections in Caucasus. Stavropol: Russia, 1978. pp. 39–40.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Manvelian, D., Chautidze, A., Tarasov, M., Beyer, A. Peculiarities of epizootics of plague in scare settlements of Microtus arvalis and tactics of epizootological investigation in the years of low epizootics of focus. Especially dangerous infections. Stavropol: Russia, 1987. pp. 91–93.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tsikhistavi, Sh., Magradze, G., Tarasov, M., Goncharov, A. Results of epizootological investigation of southern slopes of Big Caucasus. Especially dangerous infections. Stavropol: Russia, 1987. p. 111–112.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Emelianov, P. Climate of high mountainous Caucasus as a possible factor of long-term maintenance of plague microbe in rodents’ burrows. Especially dangerous infections. Stavropol: Russia, 1987. pp. 80–82.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Petrov, P., Adamov, A., Naiden, P., Khajakian, G. Some issues of the follow up study of epizootics of plague in mountainous focus of South Caucasus. Prevention of endemic infections. Stavropol: Russia, 1983. pp. 95–97.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Aliev, M., Savelev, B., Djaganov, M., Djaganov, M., Ismailov, A., Mekhtiev, A. Some peculiarities of plague epizootics in common vole on the territory of Shakhbuz rayon in the Nakhchevan Autonomous Republic. Especially dangerous infections. Stavropol: Russia, 1987. pp. 61–64.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Denisenko, I., Denisov, P., Podsvirov, A., et al. Peculiarities of epizootics of plague in 1985-1986 within the scope of activity of Elistin anti-plague station. Especially dangerous infections. Stavropol: Russia, 1987. pp. 73–75.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fedorov, V., Rall, Yu. Epizootological regularities and epidemiological peculiarities in natural plague foci of different types. Works of scientific research anti-plague institutions of Caucasus and South Caucasus. Edition 4. pp. 36–47.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Chautidze, A., Manvelian, D., Tarasov, M., Goncharov, A. Observation on restoring the quantity of common vole after deep depression on Javakheti Plateau. Especially dangerous infections. Stavropol: Russia, 1987. pp. 314–315.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Petrov, P., Adamyan, A., Mnatsakanyan, A. On reasons for the persistence of plague in certain parts of the high mountainous focus of the South Caucasus. Especially dangerous infections. Stavropol: Russia, 1978. pp. 65–67.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bezsonova, A. 1928. About two varieties of B. pestis, which can be distinguished while growing on glycerol-containing media. Herald Microbiol. Epidemiol. Parasitol. 7:250–253.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sakvarelidze, L., Nersesov, B., Georgadze, T., Kulev, A. Relative cultural and morphological characteristics of strains of Yersinia isolated in the territory of Georgia. Especially dangerous infections in the Caucasus. Stavropol: Russia, 1984. pp. 111–112.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kozlov, M.P. Plague (natural focality, epizootology, epidemiological manifestations). Moscow: Meditsina Press; 1979.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Anisimov, A.P. 2002. Yersinia pestis factors assuring circulation and maintenance of the plague pathogen in natural foci ecosystems. Report 1. Mol. Gen. Mikrobiol. Virusol. 3:3–23.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Aparin, G.P., Golubinskii, E.P. Plague microbiology. Manual. Irkutsk: Irkutsk State University; 1989.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Plague manual. Epidemiology, distri 257 bution, surveillance and control. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1999. p. 63.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Evans, A., Brachman, P.S., editors. Bacterial infections of humans. Epidemiology and control. Third Edition. 1998. p. 547.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Perry, R.D., Fetherston, J.D. 1997. Yersinia pestis - etiologic agent of plague. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 10:35–66.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rudnev, G.P. Clinical picture of plague. Moscow: Medgiz; 1940.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Anisimov, A., Linder, L.E., Pier, G.B. Intra-specific diversity of Yersinia pestis. Clinical microbiology reviews. 2004. p. 695.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kuklev, E. Quantitative assessment of epidemic potential of natural plague foci. Sc.D. thesis. Russian Research Anti-Plague Institute “Microbe.” Saratov: Russia, 1999.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kuklev, E., Kokushkin, A., Kutireb, B. 2001. Quantitative assessment of indicators of epidemiological potential in natural foci of plague and optimization of epidemiological surveillance on the infection. J. Epidemiol. Infect. Dis. 2001. 5:10–13.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lela Bakanidze
    • 1
  • Paata Imnadze
    • 1
  • Svetlana Chubinidze
    • 1
  • Nikoloz Tsertsvadze
    • 1
  • Gela Mgeladze
    • 1
  • Irakli Shalutashvili
    • 1
  • Shota Tsanava
    • 1
  • Merab Shavishvili
    • 1
  • Julietta Manvelyan
    • 1
  • Nana Ninashvili
    • 1
  • Guram Katsitadze
    • 1
  1. 1.National Center for Disease Control and Public Health and Medical Statistics of GeorgiaTbilisiGeorgia

Personalised recommendations