Boundary Layer Structure over a Two-Dimensional Rough Wall

  • Michael P. Schultz
  • Ralph J. Volino
  • Karen Flack
Conference paper
Part of the IUTAM Bookseries book series (IUTAMBOOK, volume 22)

Abstract

Turbulence measurements for a zero pressure gradient boundary layer over a two-dimensional (2-D) roughness are presented and compared to previous results for a smooth wall and a three-dimensional (3-D) roughness [5]. The present experiments were made on transverse square bars in the fully-rough flow regime. The 2-D bars lead to significant changes in the turbulence in the outer flow. Reynolds stresses, particularly \({\overline{{v^{\prime}}^{2}}}^{+}\)and \(-{\overline{u^{\prime} v^{\prime}}}\,^{+}\), increase, although the mean flow is not as significantly affected. Large scale turbulent motions originating at the wall lead to increased spatial scales in the outer flow. The dominant feature of the outer flow, however, remains hairpin vortex packets which have similar inclination angles for all wall conditions. The differences between boundary layers over 2-D and 3-D roughness are attributable to the scales of the motion induced by each type of roughness. It is also noted that there are fundamental differences in the response of internal and external flows to strong wall perturbations, with internal flows being less sensitive to roughness effects due to their boundary conditions.

Keywords

Boundary Layer Reynolds Stress Turbulent Boundary Layer Roughness Element Turbulent Channel Flow 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    J. Jimenez, Turbulent flows over rough walls. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 36, 173–196 (2004)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    A.A. Townsend, The Structure of Turbulent Shear Flow. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK 1976)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    M.P. Schultz, K.A. Flack, The rough-wall turbulent boundary layer from the hydraulically smooth to the fully rough regime. J. Fluid Mech. 580, 381–405 (2007)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    K.A. Flack, M.P. Schultz, J.S. Connelly, Examination of a critical roughness height for boundary layer similarity. Phys. Fluids (2007) doi: 10.1063/1.2757708Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    R.J. Volino, M.P. Schultz, K.A. Flack, Turbulence structure in rough- and smooth-wall boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 592, 263–293 (2007)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    P.A. Krogstad, R.A. Antonia, Surface roughness effects in turbulent boundary layers. Exp. Fluid 27, 450–460 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    P.A. Krogstad, H.I. Andersson, O.M. Bakken, A. Ashrafian, An experimental and numerical study of channel flow with rough walls. J. Fluid Mech. 530, 327–352 (2005)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    S.H. Lee, H.J. Sung, Direct numerical simulation of the turbulent boundary layer over a rod-roughened wall. J. Fluid Mech. 584, 125–146 (2007)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    A.E. Perry, M.S. Chong, On the mechanism of wall turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 119, 173–217 (1982)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    A.E. Perry, I. Marusic, A wall-wake model for the turbulence structure of boundary layers. Part 1. Extension of the attached eddy hypothesis. J. Fluid Mech. 298, 361–388 (1995)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    N. Hutchins, W.T. Hambleton, I. Marusic, Inclined cross-stream stereo particle image velocimetry measurements in turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 541, 21–54 (2005)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael P. Schultz
    • 1
  • Ralph J. Volino
    • 1
  • Karen Flack
    • 1
  1. 1.U.S.Naval AcademyAnnapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations