Advertisement

Global Distribution of Magnetic Storm Fields and Relativistic Particles Fluxes

  • Olga MaksimenkoEmail author
  • Galyna Melnyk
Conference paper
Part of the NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security book series (NAPSC)

Abstract

The results of a total magnetic field and ring current (RC) field calculations in the inner magnetosphere (±10 R E ) are presented, using Tsyganenko’s T01 empirical model for disturbed magnetospheric magnetic field. The maps of the spatial distribution of model magnetic fields for an intensive magnetic storm on April 6–7th, 2000 were analysed. Moving the large-scale non-uniform structural boundaries change is picked out in the geomagnetic model field distribution both for the main phase of the magnetic storm and for quiet day. The difference of the contributions of RC and cross-section tail current magnetic fields in the total magnetic field during the main and the recovery phases of the magnetic storm is determined. Different dynamics of the relativistic proton and electron fluxes at a geostationary orbit near the magnetic storms has been shown.

Keywords

Magnetic field Model Magnetic storm 

References

  1. Feldstein Y, Popov V, Cumnock J et al (2006) Auroral alectrojets and boundaries of plasma domains in the magnetosphere during magnetically disturbed intervals. Ann Geopys V 24(8):22–2276Google Scholar
  2. Huttunen K, Koskinen H, Pulkkinen T, et al (2002) April 2000 magnetic storm: solar wind driver and magnetospheric response. J Geophys Res A12 107:1440. doi: 10.1029/2001JA009154Google Scholar
  3. Kalegaev VV, Ganushkina NY, Pulkkinen TI et al (2005) Relation between the ring current and the tail current during magnetic storms. Ann Geopys V 23(2):523–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Kanekal S, Baker D, Blake J et al (1999) Magnetospheric response to magnetic cloud (coronal mass ejection) events: relativistic electron observations from SAMPEX and Polar. J Geophys Res 104:24885–24894CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kozyra J, Liemohn M (2003) Ring current energy input and decay. Space Sci Rev 109:105–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Newell P, Ruohoniemi J, Meng C-I (2004) Maps of precipitation by source region, binned by IMF, with inertial convection streamlines. J Geophys Res 109 A10206. doi: 10.1029/2004JA010499Google Scholar
  7. Reeves G, McAdams K, Friedel R et al (2003) Acceleration and loss of relativistic electrons during geomagnetic storms. Geophys Res Lett 30(10) 1529. doi: 10.1029/2002GL016513Google Scholar
  8. Tsyganenko N (2002) A new magnetospheric magnetic field model. 1. Mathematical structure 2. Parameterization and fitting to observations. J Geophys Res V107 A8. doi: 10.1029/2001JA000220Google Scholar
  9. Tsyganenko N, Singer H, Kasper J (2003) Storm-time distortion of the inner magnetosphere: How severe can it get? J Geophys Res V108 A5. doi: 10.1029/2002JA009808Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of GeophysicsUkrainian National Academy of SciencesKievUkraine

Personalised recommendations