Advertisement

Geomagnetic Disturbances and Seismic Events in the Vrancea Zone from in Situ Data

  • Frina Sedova
  • Vladimir Bakhmutov
  • Tamara MozgovayaEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security book series (NAPSC)

Abstract

Based on example from the Vrancea’s concentrated seismicity zone the connection between definite type of geomagnetic disturbances and 200 earthquakes during the period of 1988–1996 is shown. The energy classes of earthquakes are related to abrupt changes (“gradients”) in H-component of geomagnetic field. Taking into account the temporal interval from maximum of sub-storm up to the shock, the relationship between geomagnetic disturbances and earthquakes is always positive. The time interval between maximum of polar sub-storm and earthquake is correlated with the depth of the earthquake. Differences in the duration of polar substorms before crustal (shallow) and deep earthquakes are revealed. Four main types of morphological features of geomagnetic variations preceding the seismic event are established.

Keywords

Geomagnetic disturbances Earthquakes Seismicity zone Polar substorm 

References

  1. Bakhmutov VG, Sedova FI, Mozgovaya TA (2006) Morphological features in the structure of geomagnetic variations in relation to earthquake in Vrancea zone. Geophys J 28(1):42–50 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  2. Bakhmutov VG, Sedova FI, Mozgovaya TA (2007) Geomagnetic disturbances and earthquakes in the Vrancea zone. Fizika Zemli 11:30–36Google Scholar
  3. Kormiltsev VV, Kostrov NP, Ratushnyak AN, Shapiro VA (2002) The influence of electro-osmotic pressure generating by geomagnetic disturbances on the evolution of seismotectonic process. In: Nayakawa M, Molchanov OA (eds) Electromagnetic: lithosphere–atmosphere–ionosphere coupling. Terrapub, Tokyo, pp 203–207Google Scholar
  4. Martin M, Wenzel F, the CALIXTO working group (2005) High-resolution teleseismic body wave tomography beneath SE Romania – II. Imaging of a slab detachment sce-nario. Geophys J Int 164(3):579–595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Rikitaky T (1979) Earthquakes prediction. Mir Press, Moscow, p 388 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  6. Sedova FI, Mozgovaya TA, Bakhmutov VG (2001) On morphological signs in the structure of geomagnetic variations on the eve and at the moment of earthquake in the Crimea-Black Sea and the Carpathian regions. Geophys J 23(4):61–68, in RussianGoogle Scholar
  7. Seismological Bulletin of Ukraine (IGF NAN Ukrainy, Simferopol, 1977, 1988–1996) (in Russian)Google Scholar
  8. Sobolev GA (1993) Bases of the forecast of the earthquakes. Nauka Press, Moscow, p 313 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  9. Sobolev GA (2003) Earthquake physics and precursors. (Nauka, Moskow (in Russian)Google Scholar
  10. Sobolev GA, Zakrzhevskaya NA, Kharin EP (2001) On the relation between seismicity and ­magnetic storms. Phys Solid Earth Russ Acad Sci 11:62 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  11. Tarasov NT, Tarasova NV, Avagimov AA, Zeigarnik VA (1999) The effect of high-power electromagnetic pulses on the seismicity of the Central Asia and Kazakhstan. Volcan Seismol Russ Acad Sci 4/5:152–160 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  12. Zakrzhevskaya NA, Sobolev GA (2002) On the seismicity effect of magnetic storms. Phys Solid Earth Russ Acad Sci 4:3–15 (in Russian)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frina Sedova
    • 1
  • Vladimir Bakhmutov
    • 1
  • Tamara Mozgovaya
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Institute of GeophysicsUkrainian National Academy of SciencesKievUkraine

Personalised recommendations