Skip to main content

Keeping the Dream Alive: What ELSI-Research Might Learn from Parliamentary Technology Assessment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Nanotechnology and the Challenges of Equity, Equality and Development

Part of the book series: Yearbook of Nanotechnology in Society ((YNTS,volume 2))

  • 767 Accesses

Abstract

The last section of the book offers lessons for action. Rinie van Est, a staff member at the Dutch parliamentary technology assessment organization, the Rathenau Institute, proposes that the notion of moving towards equity and equality through nanotechnology is as big a vision as the visions of technological transformation put forth by many nano-advocates. In order to move in the direction of the vision, van Est argues for three important steps. First, we must reflect on emerging equity and quality issues early in the development of new technologies rather than after they are produced. Van Est challenges researchers to develop constructive suggestions to strengthen equity and equality. Second, we need to mobilize the public rather than wait for people to get interested in nanotechnology. Van Est envisions people of all walks of life weighing in on what they want our nano-enabled future to be. To make this possible we need to stimulate public participation on many levels, including the active engagement of civil society organizations and experts like social scientists, policy makers, and politicians. Third, and perhaps most important for this volume, van Est encourages ELSI-researchers to play a more active role in the public and political debate so their insights may have a larger impact in society. Publishing in academic journals. . . or even Yearbooks. . . may not reach a sufficient audience to make change possible. To further the cause of equity in a meaningful way, academe needs to connect with the larger world.—eds.

This chapter was peer reviewed. It was originally presented at the Workshop on Nanotechnology, Equity, and Equality at Arizona State University on November 21, 2008.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bijker, Wiebe, E. 1995. Of Bicycles, bakelites, and bulbs: Toward a theory of sociotechnical change. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bijker, Wiebe, E. 2003. The need for public intellectuals: A space for STS. Pre-presidential address, Annual Meeting 2001, Cambridge, MA. Science, Technology & Human Values 28: 443–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collingridge, David. 1980. The social control of technology. London: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danielle Bütschi, Rainer Carius, Michael Decker, Søren Gram, Armin Grunwald, Petr Machleidt, Stef Steyaert, Rinie van Est. 2004. The practice of TA; Science, interaction and communication. In Bridges between science, society and policy: Technology assessment – Methods and impacts. eds. Michael Decker and Miltos Ladikas. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Decker, Michael and Miltos Ladikas, eds. 2004. Bridges between science, society and policy: Technology Assessment – Methods and impacts. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Man, Hugo. 2005. Ambient intelligence: Gigascale dreams and nanoscale realities. IEEE International Solid State Circuits Conference, February 6–10, San Francisco, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijstelbloem, Huub. 2008. Politiek vernieuwen: Op zoek naar publiek in de technologische samenleving. Amsterdam: Van Gennep.

    Google Scholar 

  • ETC Group. 2003. The big down: From genomes to atoms. Atomtech: Technologies converging at the nano-scale. Winnipeg, Canada: ETC Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • ETC Group. 2007. Extreme genetic engineering. An introduction to synthetic biology. Winnipeg, Canada: ETC Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • ETC Group. 2008. Commodifying nature’s last straw? Extreme genetic engineering and the post-petroleum sugar economy. Winnipeg, Canada: ETC Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. 2006. Science and society action plan. European Research Area. Brussels: European Commission, DG Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasanoff, Sheila. 1997. NGOs and the environment: From knowledge to action. Third World Quarterly, 18 (3): 579–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joss, Simon, and Sergio Bellucci, eds. 2002. Participatory technology assessment: European perspectives. London: Centre for the Study of Democracy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joy, Bill. 2000. “Why the future doesn’t need us.” Wired 8 (4) April: 238–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macnaghten, Phil, Matthew Kearnes, and Brian Wynne. 2005. Nanotechnology, governance, and public deliberation: What role for the social sciences? Science Communication 27 (2) December: 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Human Genome Research Institute. 2008. About ELSI: About the ethical, legal, and social implications (ELSI) program. http://www.genome.gov/10001754. (accessed September 23, 2008).

  • Rinie van Est, Christien Enzing, Mark van Lieshout, Anouschka Versleijen. 2006. Welcome to the 21st century: Heaven, hell or down to earth? A historical, public debate and technological perspective on the convergence of nanotechnology, biotechnology, information technology and the cognitive sciences. In Robby Berloznik, Raf Casert, Robby Deboelpaep, Rinie van Est, Christien Enzing, and Anouschka Versleijen, eds. Technology Assessment on converging technologies. European Parliament Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roco, Mihail C., and William S. Bainbridge, eds. 2002. Converging technologies for improving human performance: Nanotechnology, biotechnology, information technology and cognitive science. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation (NSF)/Department of Commerce (DOC). June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, Nicolas. 2006. The politics of life itself: Biomedicine, power, and subjectivity in the twenty-first century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering. 2004. Nanoscience and nanotechnologies: Opportunities and uncertainties. London: The Royal Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandler, Ronald. 2009. Nanotechnology: The social and ethical issues. Washington: NJ: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schot, Johan, and Arie Rip. 1996. The past and future of constructive technology assessment. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 54: 251–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silver, Lee. 1998. Remaking Eden: Cloning and beyond in a Brave New World. New York: Avon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slocum, Nikki. 2003. Participatory methods toolkit: A practitioner’s manual. Brussels: King Baudouin Foundation and Flemish Institute for Science and Technology Assessment.

    Google Scholar 

  • The PAGANINI project. 2007. Participatory governance and institutional innovation: The new governance of life. A summary report of the PAGANINI project. Austria: Department of Political Science, University of Vienna.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Eijndhoven, Josee. 1997. Technology assessment: Product or process? Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 54: 269–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Est, Rinie, Ineke Malsch, and Arie Rip. 2004. Om het Kleine te Waarderen. Een schets van nanotechnologie: publiek debat, toepassingsgebieden en maatschappelijke aandachtspunten. The Hague: Rathenau Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Est, Rinie. 2010. The broad challenge of public engagement in science. In Science and technology policy in the making: Observation and engagement, ed. Erik Fisher, Special Issue of Science and Engineering Ethics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vig, N. and H. Paschen. eds. 2000. Parliaments and technology: The development of technology assessment in Europe. Albany, NY: State University of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilsdon, J. and R. Willis. 2004. See-through Science: Why public engagement needs to move upstream. London: Demos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwart, H. and A. Nelis. 2009. What is ELSA genomics? EMBO reports: Science & Society series on convergence research 10: 540–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank the editors for their constructive comments on this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rinie van Est .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

van Est, R. (2010). Keeping the Dream Alive: What ELSI-Research Might Learn from Parliamentary Technology Assessment. In: Cozzens, S., Wetmore, J. (eds) Nanotechnology and the Challenges of Equity, Equality and Development. Yearbook of Nanotechnology in Society, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9615-9_24

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics