The Potential of Nanotechnology for Equitable Economic Development: The Case of Brazil
Luciano Kay and Philip Shapira take a more detailed look at the consequences of Brazilian nanotechnology, using publication and patent data. Brazil is the powerhouse of Latin America in terms of research output in nanotechnology, and national policy tries hard to link that output to innovation outcomes. However, as with most Brazilian science, the regional distribution is highly uneven, and nanotechnology shows no signs of equalizing it. Kay and Shapira examine Brazil’s performance on four criteria of equitable economic development: agenda setting; R&D investment; R&D outcomes; and risk awareness and allocation.
KeywordsLatin American Country Agenda Setting Nanotechnology Research International Patent Classification Risk Awareness
This study uses data from the large-scale global nanotechnology publication and patent datasets developed by the group on Nanotechnology Research and Innovation Systems at Georgia Institute of Technology – a component of the Center for Nanotechnology in Society (CNS-ASU). Support for the research was provided through CNS-ASU with sponsorship from the National Science Foundation (Award No. 0531194). The findings and observations contained in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.
- Bound, Kirsten. 2008. Brazil. The natural knowledge economy. London: Demos.Google Scholar
- CGEE. 2007. Analise da pesquisa nacional por amostra de domicilios PNAD 2005. Livro 3: pobraza e desigualdade. Brasilia, DF: Centro de Gestao e Estudos Estrategicos (CGEE).Google Scholar
- Cozzens, Susan. E., Rob Hagendijk, Peter Healey, and Tiago Santos Pereira. 2007. A framework for analyzing science, technology and inequalities: Preliminary observations. ResIST: Researching Inequality through Science and Technology. Working Paper 3. Oxford: James Martin Institute.Google Scholar
- de Almeida, Alexandra, O. 2003. Responses to questionnaire on nanotechnology: Brazil. Evidence to the Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering study on nanoscience and nanotechnologies. São Paulo: British Consulate General.Google Scholar
- Fields, Gary. S. 2001. Distribution and development: A new look at the developing world. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Glänzel, Wolfgang, Martin Meyer, M. Du Plessis, Bart Thijs, Tom Magerman, and Balazs Schlemmer. 2003. Nanotechnology, analysis of an emerging domain of scientific and technological endeavor. Leuven: O&O Statistieken.Google Scholar
- IBGE. 2007. IBGE divulga as contas regionais 2002–2005. http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/presidencia/noticias/noticia_visualiza.php?id_noticia=1039&id_pagina=1 (retrieved November 2, 2008).
- Invernizzi, Noela. 2007. Los científicos brasileños legitiman las nanotecnologías. Red Latinoamericana de Nanotecnología y Sociedad—ReLANS. http://estudiosdeldesarrollo.net/relans/documentos/Noela-Visiones-esp.pdf. (retrieved December 12, 2007).
- Invernizzi, Noela, and Guillermo Foladori. 2005. Nanotechnology and the developing world: Will nanotechnology overcome poverty or widen disparities? Nanotechnology Law & Business Journal 2: 1–10.Google Scholar
- Kay, Luciano, Noela Invernizzi, and Philip Shapira. 2009. The role of Brazilian firms in nanotechnology development. Paper presented at Atlanta Conference on Science and Technology, October 2009. http://www.cherry.gatech.edu/PUBS/09/Kay-Invernizzi-Shapira-09atlanta%20conf.pdf. (retrieved December 13, 2009).
- Knobel, Marcelo. 2002. Nanoredes. http://www.comciencia.br/reportagens/nanotecnologia/nano11.htm. (retrieved October 20, 2008).
- Lux. 2007. The nanotech report. Investment overview and market research for nanotechnology. 5th Ed. New York: Lux Research Inc.Google Scholar
- MCT. 2003. Programa de desenvolvimento da nanociência e da nanotecnologia. Proposta do Grupo de Trabalho criado pela Portaria MCT nº 252 como subsídio ao Programa de Desenvolvimento da Nanociência e da Nanotecnologia do PPA 2004–2007. http://www.mct.gov.br/upd_blob/0002/2361.pdf. (retrieved June 18, 2009).
- MCT. 2006. Relatório nanotecnologia investimentos, resultados e demandas. Secretaria de Desenvolvimento Tecnológico e Inovação (SETEC)—Coordenação-Geral de Micro e Nanotecnologias (CGNT). Brasília: Ministério da Ciência e Tecnologia.Google Scholar
- Novak, Joseph D., and Alberto J Cañas. 2008. The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct and use them. Pensacola, FL: Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition.Google Scholar
- NTSC. 2007. The national nanotechnology initiative: Strategic plan. Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President, National Science and Technology Council, Nanoscale Science, Engineering, and Technology Subcommittee.Google Scholar
- OSEC. 2005. Brazil: Nanotechnology overview. São Paulo, Swiss Business Hub Brazil, Business Network Switzerland. http://www.osec.ch. (retrieved January 23, 2010).
- Packer, Abel L., and Rogerio Meneghini. 2006. Articles with authors affiliated to Brazilian institutions published from 1994 to 2003 with 100 or more citations: I—The weight of international collaboration and the role of the networks. Anais Da Academia Brasileira De Ciencias 78: 841–853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- PEN. 2009. Inventory of nanotechnology-based consumer products currently on the market. Project on emerging nanotechnologies. http://www.nanotechproject.org/inventories/. (retrieved October 23, 2009).
- UNESCO. 2005. UNESCO science report 2005. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.Google Scholar
- Wilsdon, James. 2004. The politics of small things: Nanotechnology, risk, and uncertainty. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, Winter 2004.Google Scholar