Abstract
Analysis procedures developed in the last two decades for performance-based seismic assessment and retrofit design of building structures are critically evaluated. Nonlinear analysis procedures within the framework of deformation-based seismic assessment process are classified with respect nonlinear modeling and acceptance criteria. The critical transition from linear engineering to nonlinear, performance-based engineering practice is addressed. Specifically, the need for enhancing engineers’ knowledge on nonlinear behavior and analysis methods in university education and professional training is highlighted. Rigorous as well as practice-oriented nonlinear analysis procedures based on pushover analysis are treated where special emphasis is given to the latter. All significant pushover analysis procedures developed in the last two decades are summarized and systematically assessed on the basis of a common terminology and notation. Each procedure is evaluated in terms of its practical use as a capacity estimation tool versus capacity-and-demand estimation tool.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Antoniou S, Rovithakis A, Pinho R (2002) Development and verification of a fully adaptive pushover procedure. Paper No. 822. In: Proceedings of the 12th European conference on earthquake engineering, London
Antoniou S, Pinho R (2004a) Advantages and limitations of adaptive and non-adaptive force-based pushover procedures. J Earthquake Eng 8:497–552
Antoniou S, Pinho R (2004b) Development and verification of a displacement-based adaptive pushover procedure. J Earthquake Eng 8:643–661
ASCE – American Society of Civil Engineers (2007) Seismic rehabilitation of existing buildings (ASCE 41-6), 1st edn, Washington, DC
ATC – Applied Technology Council (1978) Tentative provisions for the development of seismic regulations for buildings (ATC – 03), Redwood City, CA
ATC – Applied Technology Council (1996) Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings (ATC – 40), Redwood City, CA
Aydınoğlu MN (2003) An incremental response spectrum analysis based on inelastic spectral displacements for multi-mode seismic performance evaluation. Bull Earthquake Eng 1:3–36
Aydınoğlu MN (2004) An improved pushover procedure for engineering practice: Incremental Response Spectrum Analysis (IRSA). International workshop on “performance-based seismic design: concepts and implementation”, Bled, Slovenia, PEER Report 2004/05 pp 345–356
Aydınoğlu MN (2005) A code approach for deformation-based seismic performance assessment of reinforced concrete buildings. International workshop on “seismic performance assessment and rehabilitation of existing buildings”, Joint Research Centre (JRC), ELSA Laboratory, Ispra, Italy
Aydınoğlu MN (2007) A response spectrum-based nonlinear assessment tool for practice: incremental response spectrum analysis (IRSA), Special issue: response spectra (Guest Editor: Trifunac MD). ISET J Earthquake Technol 44(1):481
BCJ (2009) Building center of Japan: the building standard law of Japan, Tokyo
CEN (2004) European committee for standardization: Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance, Part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. European Standard EN 1998-1, Brussels
CEN (2005) European committee for standardization: Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance, Part 3: assessment and retrofitting of buildings. European Standard EN 1998-3, Brussels
Chintanapakdee C, Chopra AK (2003) Evaluation of the modal pushover analysis procedure using vertically regular and irregular generic frames. Report No. EERC-2003/03, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA
Chopra AK (2001) Dynamics of structures, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
Chopra AK, Goel RK (2002) A modal pushover analysis for estimating seismic demands for buildings. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 31:561–582
CSI (2006) Computers and Structures Inc.: perform – components and elements for perform-3D and perform-collapse, Version 4, Berkeley, CA
Elnashai AS (2002) Do we really need inelastic dynamic analysis? J Earthquake Eng 6:123–130
Fajfar P, Fischinger M (1988) N-2 A method for nonlinear seismic analysis of regular structures. In: Proceedings of the 9th world conference on earthquake engineering, Tokyo
FEMA – Federal Emergency Management Agency (1997) NEHRP guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings (FEMA 273). Washington, DC
FEMA – Federal Emergency Management Agency (1997) NEHRP Commentary on the guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings (FEMA 274). Washington, DC
FEMA – Federal Emergency Management Agency (2000) Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings (FEMA 356). Washington, DC
FEMA – Federal Emergency Management Agency (2005) Improvement of nonlinear static seismic analysis procedures (FEMA 440). Washington, DC
FEMA – Federal Emergency Management Agency (2009) Effects of strength and stiffness degradation on seismic response (FEMA 440A). Washington, DC
Filippou FC, Fenves GL (2004) Methods of analysis for earthquake-resistant design. In: Bozorgnia Y, Bertero VV (eds) Earthquake engineering – from engineering seismology to performance-based engineering. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL
Freeman SA, Nicoletti JP, Tyrell JV (1975) Evaluations of existing buildings for seismic risk – a case study of puget sound naval shipyard, Bremerton, WA. In: Proceedings of the 1st U.S. national conference on earthquake engineering, EERI, Berkeley, pp 113–122
Goel RK, Chopra AK (2004) Evaluation of modal and FEMA pushover analyses: SAC buildings. Earthquake Spectra 20:225–254
Goel RK, Chopra AK (2005) Extension of modal pushover analysis to compute member forces. Earthquake Spectra 21:125–139
Gupta B, Kunnath SK (2000) Adaptive spectra-based pushover procedure for seismic evaluation of structures. Earthquake Spectra 16:367–391
Hernandeez-Montes E, Kwon OS, Aschheim MA (2004) An energy based formulation for first and multiple-mode nonlinear (pushover) analyses. J Earthquake Eng 8:69–88
Ibarra LF, Krawinkler H (2005) Global collapse of frame structures under seismic excitations. PEER Report 2005/06, Berkeley, CA
ICBO – International Conference of Building Officials (1988) Uniform building code, Whittier, CA
Kalkan E, Kunnath SK (2004) Method of modal combinations for pushover analysis of buildings. Paper No. 2713. In: Proceedings of the 13th world conference on earthquake engineering, Vancouver, BC
Kalkan E, Kunnath SK (2006) Adaptive modal combination procedure for nonlinear static analysis of building structures. J Struct Eng ASCE 132:1721–1731
Jirasek M, Bazant ZP (2001) Inelastic analysis of structures. Wiley, Ne York, NY
Menegotto M, Pinto PE (1973) Method of analysis for cyclically loaded R.C. plane frames including change in geometry and non-elements behavior of elements under combined normal force and bending. In: Proceedings of the IABSE symposium, vol 13, Lisbon, Portugal, pp 15–22
Miranda E, Akkar SD (2003) Dynamic instability of simple structural systems. J Struct Eng 129:1722–1726
MPWS – Ministry of Public Works and Settlement (Turkish Government) (2007) Specification for buildings to be built in earthquake zones (in Turkish), Ankara
Orakcal K, Wallace JW (2004) Modeling of slender reinforced concrete walls. In: Proceedings of the 13th world conference on earthquake engineering, Vancouver, BC
Önem G (2008) Evaluation of practice-oriented nonlinear analysis methods for seismic performance assessment. Ph.D. Thesis, Boğaziçi University Kandilli Observatory and Earthquake Research Institute, Istanbul
Paret TF, Sasaki KK, Eilbeck DH, Freeman SA (1996) Approximate inelastic procedures to identify failure mechanisms from higher mode effects. Paper No. 966. In: Proceedings of the 11th world conference on earthquake engineering, Acapulco, Mexico
Paulay T, Priestley MJN (1992) Seismic design of reinforced concrete and masonry buildings. Wiley, New York, NY
Priestley MJN, Valvi GM, Kowalsky MJ (2007) Displacement-based seismic design of structures. IUSS Press, Pavia
Sasaki KK, Freeman SA, Paret TF (1998) Multimode pushover procedure (MMP) – a method to identify the effects of higher modes in a pushover analysis. In: Proceedings of the 6th U.S. national conference on earthquake engineering, Seattle, WA
SEAOC – Structural Engineers Association of California (1995) Vision 2000: performance based seismic engineering of buildings. San Francisco, CA
Spacone E, Filippou FC, Taucer FF (1996) Fibre bean-column model for nonlinear analysis of R/C frames. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 25:711–725
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Aydınoğlu, M.N., Önem, G. (2010). Evaluation of Analysis Procedures for Seismic Assessment and Retrofit Design. In: Garevski, M., Ansal, A. (eds) Earthquake Engineering in Europe. Geotechnical, Geological, and Earthquake Engineering, vol 17. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9544-2_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9544-2_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-9543-5
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-9544-2
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)