Advertisement

Earthquake Casualties Research and Public Education

  • M. Petal
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research book series (NTHR, volume 29)

Abstract

The mitigation of deaths and injuries is of primary concern to all disaster prevention efforts. It is to the specific causes of deaths and injuries that we must look for fundamental guidance in disaster risk reduction and public education. Disaster epidemiology provides the important evidence basis for identifying and prioritising effective structural and non-structural mitigation and environmental protection measures to be taken at all levels of society, as well as for planning for disaster response and for behavioural guidance during and after onset. Epidemiological data found in the literature is compared for individual, built environment, hazard, mitigation, and response level variables. This evidence lends important credibility to several key recommendations to the public in the areas of structural and non-structural safety, response skills and provisions. Finally, community-based training for disaster response is strongly indicated by the evidence that ‘the people around us’ are the true first responders.

Keywords

Disaster Risk Reduction Building Damage Construction Type Building Collapse Northridge Earthquake 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Applied Technology Council (1985) Earthquake damage evaluation data for California. Report ACT 13, Redwood City, CAGoogle Scholar
  2. Armenian HK, Noji EK, Organessian AP (1992) A case-control study of injuries arising from the earthquake in Armenia, 1988. Bull World Health Organ 70(2):251–257Google Scholar
  3. Armenian HK, Melkonian A et al (1997) Deaths and injuries due to the earthquake in Armenia: a cohort approach. Int J Epidemiol 26(4):806–813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arnold C et al (1982) Imperial county services building: occupant behavior and operational consequences as a result of the 1979 Imperial valley earthquake. National Science Foundation, San Mateo, CAGoogle Scholar
  5. Aroni S (1990) Earthquake casualties: A conceptual framework and interdisciplinary approach. In: Proceedings Conference XLIX. A meeting of the U.S. Ad Hoc Working Group on ‘Earthquake Related Casualties’, U.S. Geological Survey, Baltimore, MDGoogle Scholar
  6. Aroni S, Durkin M (1985) Injuries and occupant behavior in earthquakes. Joint US-Romanian Seminar on Earthquakes and Energy, Bucharest, Romania. Architectural Research Centers Consortium, Washington, DC, 2:3–40Google Scholar
  7. Bourque LB, Davenport D et al (1997) Health implications of earthquakes: physical and emotional injuries during and after the Northridge earthquake. 5th U.S., Japan Workshop on Urban Earthquakes and Hazard Reduction, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (U.S.) and Institute of Social Safety Science (Japan), Pasadena, CAGoogle Scholar
  8. Coburn A, Spence R (1992) Earthquake protection. Wiley, Chichester, EnglandGoogle Scholar
  9. Coburn A, Pomonis A et al (1989) Assessing strategies to reduce fatalities in earthquakes. In: Jones NP (ed) Proceedings, international workshop on earthquake injury epidemiology for mitigation and response. U. S. Geological Survey, Baltimore, MD, pp 107–132Google Scholar
  10. De Bruycker M, Greco D, Lechat MF (1985) The 1980 earthquake in southern Italy: mortality and morbidity. Int J Epidemiol 14:113–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. De Ville de Goyet C (2007). Health lessons learned from the recent earthquakes and tsunami in Asia. Prehosp Disaster Med Jan–Feb:15–21Google Scholar
  12. Durkin M (1989) The role of the physical setting in earthquake injuries: the Mexico experience. In: Bertero V (ed) Reducing earthquake hazards: lessons learned from the 1985 Mexico earthquake. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Oakland, CA, 89(02):205–207Google Scholar
  13. Durkin ME, Ohashi H (1989) Casualties, survival and entrapment in heavily damaged buildings. Proceedings of the Ninth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Maruzen Co., Ltd., Kyoto and Tokyo, JapanGoogle Scholar
  14. Durkin ME, Thiel CCJ et al (1991) Injuries and emergency medical response in the Loma Prieta earthquake. Bull Seismol Soc Am 81(5):2143–2166Google Scholar
  15. Erdik M (2001) Report on 1999 Kocaeli and Düzce (Turkey) earthquakes. In: Casciati F, Magonette G (eds) Structural control for civil and infrastructure engineering. World Scitific, Istanbul, pp 149–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Glass RI, Urrutia JJ, Sibony S, Smith H, Garcia B, Rizzo L (1977) Earthquake injuries related to housing in a Guatemalan village. Science 197:638–643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goltz JD, Russell LA et al (1992) Initial behavioral response to a rapid onset disaster: a case study of the October 1, 1987 Whittier Narrows Earthquake. Natural Disasters: Agenda for Future Action (Unpublished), Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
  18. Guha-Sapir D (1991) Rapid assessment of health needs in mass emergencies: Review of current concepts and methods. World Health Stat Q 44(3):171–181Google Scholar
  19. Jones NP, Wagner RM, Smith GS (1993) Injuries and building data pertinent to the Loma Prieta earthquake: County of Santa Cruz. Paper presented at the national earthquake conference, Memphis, Tennessee, 2–5 May 1993Google Scholar
  20. Jones NP, Smith G et al (1994) Morbidity and mortality in the Loma Prieta earthquake: a review of recent findings. In: Research accomplishments 1986–1994. National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, Buffalo, pp 95–106Google Scholar
  21. Krimgold F (1990) Earthquake casualty estimation and response modeling. In: Jones NP (ed) Proceedings, international workshop on earthquake injury epidemiology for mitigation and response. U. S. Geological Survey, Baltimore, MD, pp 54–59Google Scholar
  22. Lagorio HJ (1990). Status of medical inputs to vulnerability studies conducted by the U.S. Federal and State agencies. In: Jones NP (ed) Proceedings of the international workshop on earthquake injury epidemiology: implications for mitigations and response. U. S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA/Baltimore, MD. Open- File Report 90:244, 8–112Google Scholar
  23. Lechat MF (1976) The epidemiology of disasters/Epidemiology and community medicine. In: Proceedings of the royal society of medicine, London, pp 421–426Google Scholar
  24. Liang N-J, Shih Y-T, Shih F-Y, Wu H-M, Wang H-J, Shi S-F, Liu M-Y, Wang BB (2001) Disaster epidemiology and medical response in the Chi-Chi earthquake in Taiwan. Ann Emerg Med 38(5):549–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mahue-Giangreco M, Mack W, Seligson H, Bourque LB (2001) Risk factors associated with moderate and serious injuries attributable to the 1994 Northridge earthquake, Los Angeles, California. Ann Epidemiol 11(5):347–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Miyano M, Murakami H et al (1996) Human casualty due to the 1995 Great Hanshin-Awaji earthquake disaster in Japan. In: 11th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Elsevier Science Ltd, Acapulco, MexicoGoogle Scholar
  27. NIBS and FEMA (National Institute of Building Sciences and Federal Emergency Management Agency), (2003) Multi-hazard loss estimation methodology, earthquake model, HAZUS®MH technical manual. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  28. Noji EK (1989) The 1988 earthquake in Soviet Armenia: implications for earthquake preparedness. Disasters 13(3):255–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Noji E (1990) Epidemiologic studies from the 1988 Armenia earthquake: implications for casualty modeling. In: Workshop on modeling earthquake casualties for planning and response. VSP Associates and California Emergency Medical Services Authority, Asilomar, CA, pp 37–64Google Scholar
  30. Noji EK (1990) Need for a sound research program on earthquake epidemiology. In: Jones NP et al (eds) Proceedings, international workshop on earthquake injury epidemiology for mitigation and response. U.S. Geological Survey, Baltimore, MD/Reston, VA, pp 71–76Google Scholar
  31. Noji E (ed) (1997) The public health consequences of disasters. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Noji EK (1997) The epidemiology of earthquakes: implications for vulnerability reduction, mitigation and relief. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on earthquakes and people’s health: vulnerability reduction, preparedness and rehabilitation. Health Library for Disasters, World Health Organization, KobeGoogle Scholar
  33. Noji EK, Kelen GD et al (1990) The 1988 earthquake in Soviet Armenia: a case study. Ann Emerg Med 19(8):891–897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Noji EK, Armenian HK et al (1993) Issues of rescue and medical care following the 1988 Armenian earthquake. Int J Epidemiol 22(6 Dec):1070–1076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ortiz MR, Roman MR et al (1986) Brief description of the effects on health of the earthquake of 3rd March 1985, Chile. Disasters 10:125–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Osaki Y, Minowa M (2001) Factors associated with earthquake deaths in the Great Hanshin-Awaji earthquake, 1995. Am J Epidemiol 153(2):153–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Peek-Asa C, Kraus JF, Bourque LB, Vimalachandra D, Yu J, Abrams J (1998) Fatal and hospitalized injuries resulting from the 1994 Northridge earthquake. Int J Epidemiol 27(3):459–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Peek-Asa C, Ramirez MR et al (2000) GIS mapping of earthquake-related deaths and hospital admissions from the 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake. Ann Epidemiol 10(1):5–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Peek-Asa C, Ramirez M et al (2001) A population-based case-controlled study of seismic, structural, and individual factors associated with earthquake-related injury. Iowa Injury Prevention Center, IowaGoogle Scholar
  40. Petal MA (2009) Evidence-based public education for disaster prevention: causes of deaths and injuries in the 1999 Kocaeli earthquake. VDM Verlag Dr. Müller, SaarbrückenGoogle Scholar
  41. Pomonis A, Sakai S et al (1991) Assessing human casualties caused by building collapse in earthquakes. International Conference on the Impact of Natural Disasters, UCLA, Los Angeles CAGoogle Scholar
  42. Pomonis A, Coburn AW et al (1992) Part three: casualty estimation in the collapse of reinforced concrete buildings, human casualties in building collapse – second year report, Cambridge, UK, pp 33–45Google Scholar
  43. Provincia di Torino (2003) Relazione Piano Territoriale di Coordinamento. www.sistemapiemonte.it/territorio/ptcp
  44. Roces MC, White ME et al (1992) Risk factors for injuries due to the 1990 earthquake in Luzon, Philippines. Bull World Health Organ 70(4):509–514Google Scholar
  45. Safar P (1986) Rescusitation potentials in mass disaster. Prehosp Disaster Med 2:34–47Google Scholar
  46. Seligson HA, Shoaf K, Peek-Asa C, Mahue-Giangreco M (2002). Engineering-based earthquake casualty modeling: past, present and future. In: Proceedings of the 7th National Conference on Earthquakes, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  47. Shoaf KI (2002) Standardized earthquake injury classification scheme. http://www.ph.ucla.edu/cphdr/scheme.pdf
  48. Shoaf KI, Nguyen LH, Sareen HR, Bourque LB (1998) Injuries as a result of California earthquakes in the past decade. Disasters 22(3):218–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Spence R (2003) Earthquake risk mitigation in Europe: progress towards upgrading the existing building stock. In: Proceedings of the 5th national conference on earthquake engineering of Turkey, Invited LectureGoogle Scholar
  50. Tiedemann H (1989) Casualties as a function of building quality and earthquake intensity. In: Proceedings, international workshop on earthquake injury epidemiology for mitigation and response, Baltimore, MDGoogle Scholar
  51. Tierney K (1990) Epidemiology of injuries following building collapse. In: Hayes WW (ed) Proceedings of the international workshop on earthquake injury epidemiology: implications for mitigations and response. Open-File Report 90-244. U. S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA, pp 17–22Google Scholar
  52. USGS (1990). In: Proceedings of Conference XLIX: A meeting of the US ad hoc working group on “earthquake related casualties”. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report, pp 90–244Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kandilli Observatory and Earthquake Research InstituteBoğaziçi UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations