Advertisement

Conclusions: Governance Challenges in Urban and Peri-urban Areas

  • Patricia McCarney
Chapter

Abstract

An array of solutions for effective governance that integrates urban and peri-urban planning has been the subject of this book. The need to recognize better these operations on the ground and the potentials each offers in assisting a more progressive policy evolution in this field is a significant contribution from the authors. This concluding chapter identifies six emerging challenges: one, globalization of urban spaces; two, information, measurement and city indicators; three, effective coordination of funds, functions and functionaries; four, how the peri-urban poor access services; five, financing; and, six, inclusive cities. Finally, the cases documented in this volume demonstrate that inclusiveness is a way to increase efficiency in city management and service delivery across urban and peri-urban areas. New norms of practice and reform of institutional procedures in cities is dependent upon strengthening modes of inclusive urban governance.

Keywords

Metropolitan Area Municipal Council Urban Governance Sanitation Service Sustainable City 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Allen, Adriana, Dávila, Julio D. & Hofmann, Pascale. (2006). Governance of water and sanitation for the peri-urban poor: A framework for understanding and action in metropolitan regions. London: University College London, Development Planning Unit.Google Scholar
  2. Angel, S., Sheppard, S. C., & Civco, D. L. (2005). The dynamics of global urban expansion transport and urban development department. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  3. Environment and Urbanization. (2000). Special issue on poverty reduction and urban governance (April).Google Scholar
  4. Laquian, A. A. (2002). Metro Manila: people’s participation and social inclusion in a city of villages. In B. A. Ruble, R. Stren, J. S. Tulchin, & D. H. Varat (Eds.), Urban governance around the world. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.Google Scholar
  5. Laquian, A. A. (2005). Beyond metropolis: The planning and governance of Asia’s megaurban regions. Washington, DC/Baltimore, MD: Woodrow Wilson Center Press/The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Lefèvre, C. (2007). Democratic governability of metropolitan areas: International experiences and lessons for Latin American cities. In E. Rojas, J. Cuadrado-Roura, & F. J. Guell (Eds.), Governing the metropolis. Washington, DC: IADB.Google Scholar
  7. Mega V. & Pedersen J. (1998). Urban Sustainability Indicators. The European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Condition.Google Scholar
  8. McCarney, P. L. (2005). Global cities, local knowledge creation: Mapping a new policy terrain on the relationship between universities and cities. In G. Jones, P. McCarney, & M. Skolnick (Eds.), Improving knowledge, strengthening nations: the role of higher education in global perspective. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  9. McCarney, P. L. (2006). Our future: sustainable cities – turning ideas into action. Background paper prepared for UN-HABITAT World Urban Forum III held in Vancouver 19–23 June. Nairobi: United Nations-HABITAT.Google Scholar
  10. McCarney, P. L., & Stren, R. E. (Eds.). (2003). Governance on the ground: Innovations and discontinuities in cities of the developing world. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  11. McCarney, P. L., & Stren, R. E. (2008). Metropolitan governance: governing in a city of cities. In State of the world’s cities report 2008. Nairobi: United Nations-HABITAT.Google Scholar
  12. McGee, T. G., & Robinson, I. M. (Eds.). (1995). The mega-urban regions of southeast Asia. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
  13. Myers, D. J., & Dietz, H. A. (Eds.). (2002). Capital city politics in Latin America. Democratization and empowerment. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner. National Research Council. (2003). Cities transformed. Demographic change and itsimplications in the developing world. London: Earthscan for the National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
  14. Ostrom, E. (1996). Crossing the great divide: Co-production, synergy and development. World Development, 24(6), 1073–1087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Public Administration and Development. (2005). Special issue on metropolitan governance reform (October).Google Scholar
  16. Rojas, E., Cuadrado-Roura, J. R., & Guell, J. M. F. (Eds.). (2005). Governar las metrópolis. Washington, DC: IADB.Google Scholar
  17. Sorensen, A. (2001). Subcentres and satellite cities: Tokyo’s 20th century experience of planned polycentrism. International Planning Studies, 6(1), 9–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Stren, R. (2007). Urban governance in developing countries: experiences and challenges. In R. Hambleton & J. Gross (Eds.), Governing cities in a global era: urban innovation, competition, and democratic reform. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  19. United Nations. (1998). Principles and recommendations for population and housing censuses. (Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division). New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  20. United Nations. (2003). World urbanization prospects: The 2003 revision. (Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division). New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  21. United Nations. (2008). State of the world’s cities report 2008. Nairobi: United Nations-HABITAT.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Global City Indicators Facility, John H. Daniels Faculty of Architecture, Landscape and DesignUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations