Descartes on Human Nature and the Human Good

Chapter
Part of the The New Synthese Historical Library book series (SYNL, volume 65)

Abstract

Lisa Shapiro considers whether Descartes is what she calls a “structural eudaimonist,” that is, one who ties the human good to human nature. She argues that even though Descartes subscribes to a virtue ethics, his dualism precludes his being a structural eudaimonist. While he offers an account of the good of the human mind as the pursuit of knowledge, and an account of the good of the human body, derived from the Stoic notion of oikeiosis, it is not clear how these two strands come together to form an account of the human good proper to the union of mind and body.

Keywords

Human Nature Function Argument Human Good Bodily Health Practical Judgment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Brennan, Tad. 2005. The Stoic life: Emotions, duties, and fate. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Long, Anthony and David Sedley, eds. 1987. The Hellenistic philosophers. Vol 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Seneca. 2007. Seneca: Selected philosophical letters. Ed. and trans. Brad Inwood. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Shapiro, Lisa. 1999. Cartesian generosity In Norms and modes of thinking in Descartes. Acta Philosophica Fennica 64: 249–275.Google Scholar
  5. Shapiro, Lisa. 2007. The correspondence between Princess Elisabeth of Bohemia and René Descartes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  6. Shapiro, Lisa. 2008. Descartes’s ethics. In A companion to Descartes, ed. Janet Broughton and John Carriero, 445–464. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Simon Fraser UniversityBurnabyCanada

Personalised recommendations