Emblem of Folk Legality: Semiotic Prosecution and the American Bald Eagle

Chapter

Abstract

In the United States, as in many other parts of the world, legality is in a constitutive relationship with culture. This chapter will examine the revered national emblem of the bald eagle through two court cases involving economic interest and religious freedom. As a symbol of law and cultural metaphor for American identity, portrayals of the bald eagle are infused with folk qualities of cultural knowledge and national identity. Interestingly, where the image of the bald eagle represents such qualities as democracy, justice, and freedom, the image of the actual bird itself can be characterized as a pest, despite its status as an endangered animal. The amalgamation of these two aspects of law, the first as virtuous and the second as practical, renders the bald eagle to be an emblematic site saturated by the intersection of legality and culture. Therefore, by seeing the bald eagle as a legal semiotic, we are able to witness how law and culture are contested in everyday American life. Through the corpses and feathers of dead bald eagles and resulting prosecutions under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940 and similar laws, the visual crafting of law onto one particular wild animal generates a rich discussion concerning the interpretation of legal example and cultural response with the bald eagle as a contested emblem of folk legality.

Keywords

Gray Wolf Bald Eagle Dead Bird Political Imagination Endangered Animal 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Brigham, J. 2009a. Seeing jurisdiction: Some jurisprudential issues arising from law being “…all over”. Law & Policy 31(4): 381–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brigham, J. 2009b. Material law: A jurisprudence of what’s real. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Correll, D. 2009. Bald eagle case sparks debate on Indians’ religious freedom. Boston Globe, NEWS, National, 3, September 27, 2009.Google Scholar
  4. Cramer, R.A. 2005. Cash, color, and colonialism: The politics of tribal acknowledgment. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
  5. Daley, S. 2008. First wolf found in Mass. In 160 years. The Boston Globe. http://www.boston.com/news/local/breaking_news/2008/03/first_wolf_foun.html. Accessed 10 Dec 2012.
  6. DeMeo, A.M. 1995. Access to eagles and eagle parts: Environmental protection v. native American free exercise of religion. Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly 22(3): 771–813.Google Scholar
  7. Department of Justice, United States Attorney Michael J. Sullivan, District of Massachusetts. 2007. Pair guilty of killing federally protected birds: Bald eagle and hundreds of great blue herons and ospreys killed by owner of trout farm. Resource Document, United States Fish and Wildlife Service. http://www.fws.gov/home/feature/2007/conviction.pdf. Accessed 6 Oct 2009.
  8. Eco, Umberto. 1976. A theory of semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Gaitenby, A. 1996. Law’s mapping of cyberspace: The shape of new social space. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 52: 135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hayward, C.R. 2000. De-facing power. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Iraola, R. 2005. The bald eagle and golden eagle protection act. Albany Law Review 68(4): 973–996.Google Scholar
  12. Johnson, R. 2005. Blurred boundaries: A double-voiced dialogue on regulatory regimes and embodied space. Law, Text, Culture 9: 157–177.Google Scholar
  13. Kevelson, Roberta. 1988. The law as a system of signs. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lorenz, A.R.S. 2007. Lyrics and the law: The constitution of law in music. Lake Mary: Vandeplas.Google Scholar
  15. Manderson, D., and S. Turner. 2006. Coffee house: Habitus and performance among law students. Law & Social Inquiry 31(3): 649–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Martin, S.R. 2008. Continued protection of the bald eagle after delisting. Florida Bar Journal 82(7): 44–48.Google Scholar
  17. Marusek, S. 2005. Wheelchair as semiotic: Space governance of the American handicapped parking space. Law, Text, Culture 9: 177–188.Google Scholar
  18. Marusek, S. 2006. Between disability and terror: Handicapped parking space and Homeland Security at Fenway Park. The International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 20(3): 251–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McBride, K.D. 2005. Collective dreams: Political imagination and community. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Merry, S.E. 2000. Colonizing Hawaii: The cultural power of law. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Meyer, G. 1991. The Simpsons’: Mr. Lisa Goes to Washington, episode 37. First Aired September 26, 1991. http://www.wtso.net/movie/173The_Simpsons_302_Mr_Lisa_Goes_to_Washin.html. Accessed 4 Nov 2009.
  22. Mooney, A. 2005. Keeping on the windy side of the law: The law of the beach. Law, Text, Culture 9: 189–214.Google Scholar
  23. Pitkin, H.F. 1969. The concept of representation. In Representation, ed. H.F. Pitkin, 1–23. New York: Atherton.Google Scholar
  24. Rivals, L., and J. Flynn. 2007. Forensic expert testifies in eagle killing trial. Resource Document, Springfield Republican. http://www.masslive.com/news/index.ssf/2007/03/sunderland_man_stands_trial_fo.html. Accessed 6 Oct 2009.
  25. United States Fish and Wildlife Service. 2008. Federal laws that protect bald eagles. Resource document, United States Fish and Wildlife Service. http://www.fws.gov/midwest/eagle/protect/laws.html. Accessed 4 Nov 2009.
  26. United States v. Friday. 2008. 525 F.3d 938; 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 9919; 38 ELR 20112.Google Scholar
  27. United States v. Zak. 2007. 476 F.Supp.2d 29, 2007 WL 14227442 (D. Mass.).Google Scholar
  28. Valverde, M. 2003. Law’s dream of a common knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Valverde, M. 2006. Law and order: Images, meanings, myths. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Wagner, A. 2006. The rules of the road: A universal visual semiotics. The International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 20(1): 311–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht. 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of Hawaii at HiloHiloUSA

Personalised recommendations