Advertisement

Focusing and Phenomenology

  • Antonio Q. Zirión 
Chapter
First Online:
Part of the Contributions To Phenomenology book series (CTPH, volume 62)

Abstract

Husserl founded and developed transcendental phenomenology as an eidetic discipline. It arose, first from its subject matter, but in a decisive way from the scientific and rationalistic (philosophical) goals assigned to it. As to the former, the basic concepts of a science of what is a perpetual flux have to be concepts of types, not fixed or exact concepts as those of the natural sciences, because only they can ­capture the “pronounced conformity to type” of the flux of consciousness.

Keywords

Bodily Awareness Transcendental Phenomenology Intentional Analysis Subsidiary Instruction Husserlian Phenomenology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

  1. Behnke, E. A. 1997. Somatics. In Encyclopedia of Phenomenology, gen. ed. L. Embree. Contributions to Phenomenology, 663-67. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  2. Behnke, E. A. 2001. Phenomenology of Embodiment/Embodied Phenomenology: Emerging Work. In The Reach of Reflection: Issues for Phenomenology’s Second Century, Vol. 1, eds. S. Crowell, L. Embree, and S. J. Julian, 94–117. Boca Raton, FL: Electron Press.Google Scholar
  3. Berger, Gaston, et al. 1968. Husserl. Tercer Coloquio de Royaumont. Actas del Tercer Coloquio Filosófico de Royaumont (23–30 abril 1957). Tr. A. Podetti, rev. G. Maci. Serie Mayor. Buenos Aires: Paidós.Google Scholar
  4. Drummond, J. J. 2002. Complicating the Emotions. Paper delivered at the 32nd. Husserl Circle Meeting (Lima, Perú, July 11–14).Google Scholar
  5. Gendlin, E. T. 1973. Experiential phenomenology. In Phenomenology and the Social Sciences, vol. I, ed. M. Natanson, 281–319. Evanston, IL.: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Gendlin, E. T. 1980. Experiential Explication. (1st ed. 1972) in Phenomenology and Existentialism, ed. R. C. Solomon, 160–68. Lanham-New York-London: University Press of America.Google Scholar
  7. Gendlin, E. T. 1981. Focusing. Second ed. New York - Toronto - London - Sydney - Auckland: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
  8. Gendlin, E. T. 1991. Thinking Beyond Patterns: Body, Language, and Situations. Electronic publication. The Focusing Institute. Http://www.focusing.org/tbp.html.
  9. Gendlin, E. T. 1992. The primacy of the body, not the primacy of perception. Man and World 25(3-4), October: 341–53. The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  10. Gendlin, E. T. 1997a. Experiencing and the Creation of Meaning. A Philosophical and Psychological Approach to the Subjective. Second ed. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press, Studies in Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy.Google Scholar
  11. Gendlin, E. T. 1997b. How Philosophy Cannot Appeal to Experience, and How it Can. In Language Beyond Postmodernism. Saying and Thinking in Gendlin’s Philosophy, ed. D. M. Levin.. Studies in Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy, 3–41. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Gendlin, E. T. 1997c. Reply to Mohanty. In Language Beyond Postmodernism. Saying and Thinking in Gendlin’s Philosophy, ed. D. M. Levin. Studies in Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy, 184–89. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Gendlin, E. T. 1998. A Process Model. Electronic publication. The Focusing Institute. Http://www.focusing.org/process.html.
  14. Gendlin, E. T. 2001. Introduction to Thinking at the Edge. Electronic publication. The Focusing Institute. Http://www.focusing.org/tae-intro.html.
  15. Husserl, E. 1964. The Paris Lectures. Tr. and introductory essay P. Koestenbaum. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  16. Husserl, E. 1976. Husserliana. Edmund Husserl Gesammelte Werke. Vol. VI, Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Phänomenologie. Eine Einleitung in die phänomenologische Philosophie. 2. Auflage. Photomechanischer Nachdruck. Auf Grund des Nachlasses veröffentlicht in Gemeinschaft mit dem Husserl-Archiv an der Universität Köln vom Husserl-Archiv (Louvain) unter Leitung von H. L. van Breda. Herausgegeben von W. Biemel. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  17. Husserl, E. 1977. Cartesian Meditations. An Introduction to Phenomenology. Translated by D. Cairns. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Husserl, E. 1981. Author’s Preface to the English Edition of Ideas. Trans. by W. R. Boyce Gibson. In Husserl Shorter Works, ed. P. McCormick and F. A. Elliston, foreword by W. Biemel. Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  19. Levin, D. M., ed. 1997. Language Beyond Postmodernism. Saying and Thinking in Gendlin’s Philosophy. Studies in Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Mohanty, J. N. 1997. Experience and Meaning. In Language Beyond Postmodernism. Saying and Thinking in Gendlin’s Philosophy, ed. D. M. Levin.. Studies in Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy, 176–84. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Steinbock, A. J. 1997. Back to the Things Themselves. Introduction. Human Studies 20(2), April:127–35. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  22. Welton, D. 1983. The Origins of Meaning: A Critical Study of the Thresholds of Husserlian Phenomenology. Phaenomenologica, 88. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Seminario-Taller de Estudios y Proyectos de Fenomenologia HusserlianaUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México, CoyoacánMéxicoMéxico
  2. 2.Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de HidalgoMoreliaMéxico

Personalised recommendations

Cite chapter

Buy options