Advertisement

Anthropological Zoosemiotics

  • Dario Martinelli
Chapter
Part of the Biosemiotics book series (BSEM, volume 5)

Abstract

Anthropological Zoosemiotics represents the zoosemioticians’ contribution to the dicussion of the most critical topic in all studies concerning nature: the problem of the approach. Before starting any kind of discussion on other living forms, we should ask ourselves how to approach them. Is it possible, as humans, to study them in an adequate way? Are we able to observe other animals without being conditioned by a human interpretation of reality? Questions concerning the approach arise whenever zoosemiotic issues are discussed, and – as seen in  Chapter 2, with the paragraph “Emic vs. Etic” – are unavoidable also at the level of Ethological Zoosemiotics. However, if in that case the question mostly requires biological (scientific in the strict sense) investigations, in AZ the problem appears in two clearly distinguished guises.

Keywords

American Sign Human Language Nonhuman Animal Prototypical Category Windscreen Wiper 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Cimatti F (1998) Mente e linguaggio negli animali. Carrocci, RomaGoogle Scholar
  2. Hill JH (1980) Apes and language. In: Sebeok TA, Umiker-Sebeok J (eds) Speaking of apes. Plenum, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Ingold T (1988) What is an animal? Unwin Hyman, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. Richard B (1967) Le determinisme de la construction des barrages chez le castor du Rhone. La Terre et la Vie 4:339–470Google Scholar
  5. Mainardi D (ed) (1992) Dizionario di etologia. Einaudi, TorinoGoogle Scholar
  6. Evans EP (1906) The criminal prosecution and capital punishment of animals. Faber & Faber, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. Sebeok TA (2001b) The Swiss pioneer in nonverbal communication Studies: Heini Hediger (1908–1992) Legas, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Battaglia L (1997) Etica e diritti degli animali. Laterza, Bari-RomaGoogle Scholar
  9. Bateson G (1969) Metalogue: what is an instinct? In: Sebeok T, Ramsay, A (eds) Approaches to animal communication. Mouton, The Hague, pp 11–30Google Scholar
  10. Mainardi D (1975) L’animale culturale. Rizzoli, MilanoGoogle Scholar
  11. Wittgenstein L (1978) Philosophical investigations. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  12. Regan T (1983) The case for animal rights. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. Sebeok TA, Umiker-Sebeok J (eds) (1980) Speaking of apes. Plenum, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Sebeok TA (1990) Essays in zoosemiotics. Toronto Semiotic Circle, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  15. Fisher JA (1990) The myth of anthropomorphism. In: Bekoff M, Jamieson D (eds) Interpretation and explanation in the study of animal behaviour. Westview, Boulder, CO, pp 96–116Google Scholar
  16. Sebeok TA (1996) Signs, bridges, origins. In: Trabant J (ed) Origins of language. Collegium Budapest, BudapestGoogle Scholar
  17. Patterson FG (1978) The gestures of a gorilla: language acquisition in another pongid. Brain Lang 5:72–97PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. MacCannell D (1976) The tourist: a new theory of the leisure class. Schocken Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Von Glasersfeld E (1978) Les chimpanzés et le langage. La Recherche 9:725–732Google Scholar
  20. Sebeok TA, Danesi M (2000) The forms of meaning. Mouton de Gruyter, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  21. Gardner AR, Gardner BT (1969) Teaching sign language to a chimpanzee. Science 165:664–672PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gardner AR, Gardner BT, Van Cantfort TE (eds) (1989) Teaching sign language to a chimpanzee. State University of New York Press, Albany, NYGoogle Scholar
  23. Trask RL (1995) Language: the basics. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  24. Patterson F, Linden E (1981) The education of Koko. Holt, Rineheart and Winston, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Greimas A (1987) On meaning: selected writings in semiotic theory. Frances Pinter, LondonGoogle Scholar
  26. Sebeok TA (1998) Come comunicano gli animali che non parlano. Edizioni dal Sud, ModugnoGoogle Scholar
  27. Masson JM, McCarthy S (1995) When elephants weep: the emotional lives of animals. Delacorte, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. Cavalieri P (1999) La questione animale. Bollati Boringhieri, TorinoGoogle Scholar
  29. Bateson G (1972) Steps to an ecology of mind. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
  30. Martinelli D (2002) How musical is a whale? – towards a theory of zoömusicology. International Semiotics Institute, Helsinki/ImatraGoogle Scholar
  31. Hediger H (1968) The psychology and behavior of animals in zoos and circuses. Dover, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Hockett CF (1960b) Logical considerations in the study of animal communication. In: Lanyon W, Tavolga WN (eds) Animal sounds and communication. American Institute of Biological Sciences, Washington, pp 392–430Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Art Research Faculty of ArtsUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations