Advertisement

Summer Methods in Summer Camps: Teaching Projects WILD, WET, and Learning Tree at an Outdoor Environmental Education Center

  • Charles J. Eick
  • Sarah Carrier
  • Karni Perez
  • Doyle E. Keasal
Chapter

Abstract

Elementary and secondary science preservice teachers teach environmental education (EE) to summer camp children during their first science methods course. Local children in grades K-6 attend a week-long, summer day-camp at the university’s outdoor EE education center. Preservice teachers receive training in the use of the environmental curricula including Projects WILD, WET, and Learning Tree, from a Cooperative Extension Specialist. Information on the development of these curricula is also presented. Preservice teachers collaborate with the camp director and staff to plan and coteach lessons from these environmental curricula to rotating groups of campers. A typical day at the camp is described. Elementary preservice teachers report in written journals an increase in their confidence and abilities to teach environmental science and its related interdisciplinary subjects in the outdoors.

Keywords

Preservice Teacher Environmental Education Elementary Preservice Teacher Summer Camp Outdoor Setting 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1993). Benchmarks for scientific literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bouillon, L., & Gomez, L. (2001). Connecting school and community with science learning: Real world problems and school-community partnerships as contextual scaffolds. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 878–889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Eick, C., Deutsch, W., Fuller, J., & Scott, F. (2008). Making science relevant. The Science Teacher, 75(4), 26–29.Google Scholar
  4. Hammerman, D., Hammerman, W., & Hammerman, E. (1985). Teaching in the outdoors. Danville, IL: Interstate Printers & Publishers.Google Scholar
  5. Hofstein, A., Bybee, R. W., & Legro, P. L. (1997). Linking formal and informal science education through science education standards. Science Education International, 8, 31–37.Google Scholar
  6. Irvin, T. (2007). Nature lessons. Educational Leadership, 64(8), 54–56.Google Scholar
  7. Karplus, R. (1977). Science teaching and the development of reasoning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 14(2), 169–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kelly, J. (2000). Rethinking the elementary science methods course: A case for content, pedagogy, and informal science education. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 755–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kumar, D. D., & Chubin, D. E. (Eds.). (1999). Science, technology, and society: A sourcebook on research and practice. New York: Kluwer/Plenum.Google Scholar
  10. Luehmann, A. L. (2007). Identity development as a lens to science teacher preparation. Science Education, 91, 822–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Meredith, J., Fortner, R., & Mullins, G. (1997). Model of affective learning for nonformal science education facilities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 805–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Moseley, C., Reinke, K., & Bookout, V. (2002). The effect of teaching outdoor environmental education on preservice teachers’ attitudes toward self-efficacy and outcome expectancy. The Journal of Environmental Education, 34, 9–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Negra, C., & Manning, R. (1997). Incorporating environmental behavior, ethics, and values into nonformal environmental education programs. The Journal of Environmental Education, 28(2), 10–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Powers, A. L. (2004). Teacher preparation for environmental education: Faculty perspectives on the infusion of environmental education into preservice methods courses. The Journal of Environmental Education, 35, 3–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Project Learning Tree. (2007). Retrieved September 24, 2008, from http://www.plt.org/index.cfm
  16. Project WET: Water Education for Teachers. (1998). Retrieved September 24, 2008, from www.projectWET.org/aboutus.htm
  17. Project WILD. (2006). Retrieved September 24, 2008 from http://www.projectWILD.org/index.htm
  18. Roth, W. M., & Lee, S. (2002). Breaking the spell: Science education for a free society. In W. M. Roth & J. Desautels (Eds.), Science education as/for sociopolitical action (pp. 67–95). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  19. Smith-Sebasto, N., & Smith, T. (1997). Environmental education in Illinois and Wisconsin: A tale of two states. The Journal of Environmental Education, 29, 23–31.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charles J. Eick
    • 1
  • Sarah Carrier
    • 1
  • Karni Perez
    • 1
  • Doyle E. Keasal
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Curriculum and TeachingAuburn UniversityAuburnUSA

Personalised recommendations