Advertisement

Name That Plant! Overcoming Plant Blindness and Developing a Sense of Place Using Science and Environmental Education

  • Jennifer Kreps Frisch
  • Matthew M. Unwin
  • Gerald W. Saunders
Chapter

Abstract

Plants are often overlooked or ignored entirely in K-12 classrooms. This chapter provides background information about the idea of “plant blindness,” which attempts to explain why botanical education is neglected, and why we humans have so much trouble “seeing” plants. We suggest that plants can be an integral part of life science education, and that giving teachers and students the chance to learn about and explore plant life in their communities will enhance their environmental awareness and sense of place. To this end, we make a case for giving teachers and students the skills they need to learn about the plants around them, including scientific nomenclature, evolution, and ecology. Included in the chapter are ideas for how to use nature-based outdoor experiences to teach about the environment, with an emphasis on National Science Education Standards and Environmental Education goals.

Keywords

Science Teacher Polar Bear Field Guide Corn Plant Place Attachment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R., Pintrich, P. R., et al. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing — a revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York, NY: Addison Wesley Longman.Google Scholar
  2. Ashworth, S., Boyes, E., Paton, R., & Stanisstreet, M. (1995). Conservation of endangered species: what do children think? Journal of Environmental Education and Information, 14, 229–244.Google Scholar
  3. Barman, C. R., Stein, M., Barman, N. S., & McNair, S. (2003). Students’ ideas about plants: Results from a national study. Science and Children, 41, 46–51.Google Scholar
  4. Baum, D. A., Smith, S. D., & Donovan, S. S. S. (2005). The tree-thinking challenge. Science, 310, 979–980 (supporting online material available at http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/310/5750/979/DC1)
  5. Bebbington, A. (2005). The ability of A-level students to name plants. Journal of Biological Education, 39, 62–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bloom, B. S. (Ed.). (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. White Plains, NY: Longman.Google Scholar
  7. Biggs, A. (2004). Biology: the dynamics of life. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill/Glencoe.Google Scholar
  8. Bowker, R. (2004). Children’s perceptions of plants following their visit to the Eden Project. Research in Science and Technological Education, 22, 227–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brasher, J. (2006). The southern rocky mountain interactive flora (SRMIF) and factors correlated with recognition of plants and mammals (Unpublished Dissertation). Greeley, CO: University of Northern Colorado.Google Scholar
  10. Brewer, C. (2002). Conservation education partnerships in schoolyard laboratories: A call back to action. Conservation Biology, 16, 577–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Derr, V. (2002). Children’s sense of place in northern New Mexico. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 22, 125–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ebersole, M. M., & Worster, A. M. (2007). Sense of place in teacher preparation courses: Place-based and standards-based education. Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 73(2), 19–24.Google Scholar
  13. Gatt, S., Tunnicliffe, S. D., Borg, K., & Lautier, K. (2007). Young Maltese children’s ideas about plants. Journal of Biological Education, 41, 117–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gruenewald, D. A. (2003). Foundations of place: A multidisciplinary framework for place-conscious education. American Educational Research Journal, 40, 619–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. (1995). Minds of their own. Burlington, VT: Annenberg Media.Google Scholar
  16. Hershey, D.R. (1993). Plant neglect in biology education. Bioscience, 43. Google Scholar
  17. Hershey, D. R. (1996). A historical perspective on problems in botany teaching. The American Biology Teacher, 58, 340–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Howes, E. V., Lim, M., & Solomon, S. (2007, October). Developing an Environmental “Sense of Place” for Science Teacher Education (Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southeastern Association of Science Teacher Education) Valdosta, GA.Google Scholar
  19. Kinchin, I. M. (1999). Investigating secondary-school girls’ preferences for animals or plants: a simple “head-to-head’ comparison using two unfamiliar organisms. Journal of Biological Education, 33, 95–99.Google Scholar
  20. Lieberman, G., & Hoody, L. (1998). Closing the achievement gap: Using the environment as an integrated context for learning. Poway, CA: Science Wizards.Google Scholar
  21. Lindemann-Matthies, P. (2005). ‘Lovable’ mammals and ‘lifeless’ plants: How children’s interest in common local organisms can be enhanced through observation of nature. International Journal of Science Education, 27, 655–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lindemann-Matthies, P. (2006). Investigating nature on the way to school: Responses to an education programme by teachers and their pupils. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 895–918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lock, R. (1995). Biology and the environment- A changing perspective? Or “there’s wolves in them there woods!”. Journal of Biological Education, 29, 3–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Louv, R. (2005). Last child in the woods: Saving our children from nature-deficit disorder. Chapel Hill, NC: Algonquin.Google Scholar
  25. Mack, A. (2003). Inattentional blindness: Looking without seeing. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 180–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Moon, T. J. (1921). Biology for beginners. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
  27. National Research Council (NRC). (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  28. Nichols, G. E. (1919). The general biology course and the teaching of elementary botany and zoology in American colleges and universities. Science, 50, 509–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Orr, D. W. (1994). Earth in mind: On education, environment, and the human prospect. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  30. Paraskevopoulos, S., Padeliadu, S., & Zafiropoulos, K. (1998). Environmental knowledge of elementary school students in Greece. The Journal of Environmental Education, 29, 55–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Peterson, N. (1982) Developmental variables affecting environmental sensitivity in professional environmental educators. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University.Google Scholar
  32. Project Learning Tree. (2006). Exploring environmental issues: Places we live. Washington, DC: American Forest Foundation.Google Scholar
  33. Sanger, M. (1997). Sense of place and education. Journal of environmental education, 29, 4–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schussler, E. E., & Olzak, L. A. (2008). It’s not easy being green: Student recall of plant and animal images. Journal of Biological Education, 42, 112–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Simmons, D. (1996). Teaching in natural areas: What urban teachers feel is most appropriate. Environmental Education Research, 2, 149–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Stegner, W. (1992). The sense of place. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  37. Strgar, J. (2007). Increasing the interest of students in plants. Journal of Biological Education, 42, 19–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Theobald, P., & Curtiss, J. (2000). Communities as curricula. Forum for applied research and public policy, 15(1), 106–111.Google Scholar
  39. UNESCO. (1977). The Tbilisi declaration. Available: http://www.gdrc.org/uem/ee/tbilisi.html. Accessed 12 April 2008.
  40. Uno, G. E. (1994). The state of precollege botanical education. The American Biology Teacher, 56, 263–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Vorkinn, M., & Riese, H. (2001). Environmental concern in a local context: the significance of place attachment. Environment and Behavior, 33, 249–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wake, S. J. (2007). Designed for learning: Applying “learning-informed design” for children’s gardens. Applied Environmental Education and Communication, 6, 31–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wandersee, J. H. (1986). Plants or animals – which do junior high school students prefer to study? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25, 415–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wandersee, J. H., & Schussler, E. E. (1999). Preventing plant blindness. The American Biology Teacher, 61, 84–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wandersee, J. H., & Schussler, E. E. (2001). Toward a theory of plant blindness. Plant Science Bulletin, 47, 2–9.Google Scholar
  46. Wandersee, J. H., & Clary, R. M. (2006). Advances in research towards a theory in plant ­blindness. Chapter in the Proceedings of the 6th International Congress on Education in Botanic Gardens at Oxford University. London, England: Botanic Gardens Conservation International.Google Scholar
  47. Wandersee, J. H., Clary, R. M., & Guzman, S. M. (2006). A writing template for probing students’ botanical sense of place. The American Biology Teacher, 68, 419–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wood-Robinson, C. (1991). Young people’s ideas about plants. Studies in Science Education, 19, 119–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Worster, A. M., & Abrams, E. (2005). Sense of place among New England commercial fishermen and organic farmers: implications for socially constructed environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 11, 525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jennifer Kreps Frisch
    • 1
  • Matthew M. Unwin
    • 1
  • Gerald W. Saunders
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Biology and PhysicsKennesaw State UniversityKennesawUSA
  2. 2.Center for Experiential and Environmental EducationUnity CollegeUnityUSA

Personalised recommendations