Corporate Identity, Responsibility and the Ethics of Complexity

Chapter
Part of the Issues in Business Ethics book series (IBET, volume 26)

Abstract

This chapter presents an analysis of corporate identity and responsibility. More specifically, it addresses the question of what the emergence of corporate identity can tell us about the nature of business ethics in practice. In the first section, the main insights gleaned from a complex understanding of identity are unpacked. In the second section, these complexity insights pertaining to identity formation are translated into the language of social systems, with the aim of determining the nature of corporate identity specifically. In the third section, the implications that this complexity understanding of corporate identity formation hold for business ethics are elaborated upon. The analysis in the third section provides both a challenge to the traditional understanding of moral responsibility within the context of business ethics, and an attempt to overcome the weaknesses of this traditional understanding. This latter aim is addressed by taking cognisance of the normative implications associated with a process of identity formation in work practices. Of particular concern and interest is how identities are demarcated in practice. As such, the analysis centres on the boundary questions that we ask (or don’t ask of ourselves) as corporate members and corporation; as well as the implications that such questions hold for how we view ourselves and our ethical responsibilities within the context of corporate practices.

Keywords

Business Ethic Moral Responsibility Identity Formation Work Practice Corporate Responsibility 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Abrams, D. and Hogg, M.A. 1990. Social identity theory: Constructive and critical advances. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  2. Albert, S., Ashforth, B.E. and Dutton, J.E. 2000. Organizational identity and identification: Chartering new waters and building new bridges. Academy of Management Review, 25 (1): 13–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, R. 1999. Complexity theory and organization science. Organization Science, 10 (3): 216–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ashmos, D.P. and Huber, G.P. 1987. The systems paradigm in organization theory: Correcting the record and suggesting the future. Academy of Management Review, 12 (4): 607–621.Google Scholar
  5. Berg, D.N. and Smith, K.K. 1990. Paradox and group. In J. Gillette, and M. McCollom, (eds.), Groups in context: A new perspective on group dynamics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  6. Bion, W.R. 1961. Experiences in groups. London: Tavistock Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chiles, T., Meyer, A. and Hench, T. 2004. Organizational emergence: The origin and transformation of Branson, Missouri’s musical theatres. Organization Science, 15 (5): 499–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cilliers, P. 1998. Complexity and postmodernism: Understanding complex systems. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Cilliers, P. 2001. Boundaries, hierarchies & networks in complex systems. International Journal of Innovation Management, 5 (2): 135–147.Google Scholar
  10. Cilliers, P. 2005. Complexity, deconstruction and relativism. Theory, Culture & Society, 22 (5): 255–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cilliers, P., de Villiers, T. and Roodt, V. 2002. The formation of the self. Nietzsche and complexity. South African Journal of Philosophy, 21 (1): 1–18.Google Scholar
  12. Campbell, J.L. 2005. Where do we stand? Common mechanisms in organizations and social movements research. In G.F. Davis, D. McAdam, W.R. Scott and M.N. Zald (eds.), Social movements and organization theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 41–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Collier, J. and Esteban, R. 1999. Governance in the participative organisation: Freedom, creativity and ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 21: 173–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dyke, C. and Dyke, C. 2002. Identities: The dynamic dimensions of diversity. In P. Alperson (ed.), Diversity and community: An interdisciplinary reader. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 65–87..Google Scholar
  15. Elias, N. 1994. The civilising process. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  16. Erskine, T. 2003. Can institutions have responsibility? Collective moral agency and international relations. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  17. Freeman, E.R. 2001. Stakeholder theory of the modern corporation. In W.F. Hoffman, R.E. Frederick and M. Schwartz (eds.), Business ethics: Readings and cases in corporate morality. Boston, MA: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  18. French, P.A. 1984. The corporation as a moral person. American Philosophical Quarterly, 16: 207–215.Google Scholar
  19. French, P.A. 1979. Collective and corporate responsibility. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  20. French, P.A., Nesteruk, J. and Risser, D. 1992. Corporations in the moral community. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  21. Frew, D.A. 1973. Pollution: Can the people be innocent while their systems are guilty? Academy of Management Review, 16 (3): 527–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hargrave, T.J. 2009. Moral imagination, collective action, and the achievement of moral outcomes. Business Ethics Quarterly, 19 (1): 87–104.Google Scholar
  23. Hartley, J.F. 1996. Intergroup relations in organizations. In M.A. West (ed.), Handbook of work psychology. London: Wiley, pp. 397–422.Google Scholar
  24. Hernes, T. 2003. Enabling and constraining properties of organizational boundaries. In N. Paulsen & T. Hernes (eds.), Managing boundaries in organizations: Multiple perspectives. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 35–54.Google Scholar
  25. Hogg, M.A. and Abrams, D. 1988. Social identifications: A social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Jones, C., Parker, M. and ten Bos, R. 2005. For business ethics. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Keeley, M. 1988. A social-contract theory of organizations. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame.Google Scholar
  28. Keeley, M. 1981. Organizations as non-persons. Journal of Value Inquiry, 15: 149–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ladd, J. 1970. Morality and the ideal of rationality in formal organizations. The Monist, 54 (4): 488–516.Google Scholar
  30. Kramer, R.M. 1991. Intergroup relations and organizational dilemmas: The role of categorization processes. Research in Organizational Behaviour, 13: 191–228.Google Scholar
  31. Luntley, M. 2003. Ethics in the face of uncertainty: Judgement not rules. Business Ethics: A European Review, 12 (4): 325–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. May, S. 1999. Nietzsche’s ethics and his war on “morality”. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. McKelvey, B. 1999. Avoiding complexity catastrophe in coevolutionary pockets: Strategies for rugged landscapes. Organization Science, 10 (3): 294–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mead, G.H. 1934. Mind, self and society. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Morin, E. 2008. On complexity. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
  36. Nozick, R. 1981. Philosophical explanations. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Painter-Morland, M. 2008. Business ethics as practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Painter-Morland, M. 2006. Redefining accountability as relational responsiveness. Journal of Business Ethics, 66: 89–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Parker, M. (ed.) 1998. Ethics and organizations. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  40. Paulsen, N. 2003. Who are we now?: Group identity, boundaries, and the (re)organizing process. In N. Paulsen & T. Hernes (eds.), Managing boundaries in organizations: Multiple perspectives. Hampshire, MA: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 15–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Petit, P. 2007. Responsibility incorporated. Ethics, 117: 171–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Quine, W.V. 1969. Ontological relativity and other essays. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Rorty, R. 1999. Philosophy and social hope. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  44. Seabright, M.A. and Kurke, L.B. 1997. Organisational ontology and the moral status of the corporation. Business Ethics Quarterly, 7 (4): 91–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sim, S. 2004. The routledge companion to postmodernism. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  46. Stacey, R.D. 1995. The science of complexity: An alternative perspective for strategic change processes. Strategic Management Journal, 16: 477–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Stacey, R.D. 1996. Complexity and creativity in organisations. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.Google Scholar
  48. Stacey, R.D. 2001. Complex responsive processes in organizations: Learning and knowledge creation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  49. Stacey, R.D. 2003. Complexity and group processes: A radical social understanding of individuals. Sussex: Brunner-Routledge.Google Scholar
  50. Stacey, R.D., Griffen, D. and Shaw, P. 2000. Complexity and management: Fad or radical challenge to systems thinking? London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  51. Tajfel, H. and Turner, J.C. 1986. The social identity theory of inter-group behaviour. In S. Worchel and W.G. Austin (eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations. Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall, pp. 7–24.Google Scholar
  52. Thietart, R.A. and Forgues, B. 1995. Chaos theory and organizations. Organization Science, 6: 19–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Velasquez, M.G. 1983. Why corporations are not morally responsible for anything they do. Business and Professional Ethics Journal, 2 (3): 1–18.Google Scholar
  54. Verstraeten, J. (ed.), 2000. Business ethics: Broadening the perspective. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
  55. Weick, K.E. 1995. Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  56. Werhane, P.H. 1999. Moral imagination and management decision making. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Werhane, P.H. 1980. Formal organizations, economic freedom and moral agency. Journal of Value Inquiry, 14: 43–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Westenholz, A. 2004. Emerging identities beyond organizational boundaries. In T.E. Jensen and A. Westenholz (eds.), Identity in the age of the new economy: Life in temporary and scattered work practices. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 122–145.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of StellenboschStellenboschSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations