Advertisement

Genre Emergence in Amateur Flash

  • John C. PaolilloEmail author
  • Jonathan Warren
  • Breanne Kunz
Chapter
Part of the Text, Speech and Language Technology book series (TLTB, volume 42)

Abstract

While genre emergence is a recurrent theme in research on digital media, studies of genre emergence tend to adopt approaches that do not clearly bring out role of the community in which the genres emerge. This chapter develops an approach in which a quantitative social network analysis informs our study of genre emergence in Flash animations posted to Newgrounds.com, a major web portal for amateur Flash. Results indicate that participants' social network positions are strongly associated with the genres of Flash they produce, and that social processes of support and competition are key to understanding genre emergence in the Newgrounds context. We argue from these findings that a social network approach can be crucial to understanding genre emergence.

Keywords

Multimedia New media Amateur multimedia Social network Prinicipal components analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank four anonymous reviewers and numerous colleagues in SLIS and Informatics at Indiana University for constructive criticism and comments regarding this work. An earlier version of this work was presented in January 2007 at the 40th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Waikaloa, HI.

References

  1. 1.
    Alonzo, M., and M. Aiken. 2004. Flaming in electronic communication. Decision Support Systems 36(3):205–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Biber, D. 1988. Variation in written and spoken language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Biber. D. 1995. Dimensions of register variation: A cross-linguistic comparison. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Biber, D., and J. Kurijan. 2007. Towards a taxonomy of web registers and text types: A multidimentional approach. In Corpus linguistics and the web, eds. M. Hundt, N. Nesselfhauf, and C. Biewer. Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Biber, D., E. Cosmay, K. Jones, and C. Keck. 2007. Introduction to the identification and analysis of vocabularybased discourse units. In Discouse on the move, eds. D. Biber, U. Connor, and T. Upton. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamin.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Crowston, K., and M. Williams. 1997. Reproduced and emergent genres of communication on the world-wide web. In Proceedings of the Thirtieth Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, IEEE Computer Society. Los Alamitos, CA.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Crowston, K., and B. Kwasnik. 2003. Can document-genre metadata improve information access to large digital collections? Library Trends 52(2):345–361.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Degenne, A., and M. Forse. 1999. Introducing social networks. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dillon, A., and B.A. Gushrowski. 2000. Genres and the WEB: Is the personal home page the first uniquely digital genre? Journal of the American Society of Information Science 51(2):202–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Erickson, T. 1997. Social interaction on the net: Virtual community as participatory genre. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, IEEE Computer Society. Los Alamitos, CA.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Erickson, T. 2000. Making sense of Computer-Mediated Communication (CMC): Conversations as genres, CMC systems as genre ecologies. In Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on Systems Science, IEEE Computer Society. Los Alamitos, CA.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ferguson, C.A. 1959. Diglossia. Word 15:325–340.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Herring, S.C. 1999. The rhetorical dynamics of gender harassment on-line. The Information Society 15(3):151–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hymes, D. 1972. Foundations of sociolinguistics. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kayany, J. 1998. Contexts of uninhibited online behavior: Flaming in social newsgroups on usenet. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 49(12):1135–1141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kendall, L. 2007. Colin Mochrie vs. Jesus H. Christ: Messages about masculinities and fame in online video conversations. In Proceedings of the 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, IEEE Computer Society. Los Alamitos, CA.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kim, M.-S., and Raja, N. 1991. Verbal aggression and self-disclosure on computer bulletin boards. Paper presented at the 41st Annual Meeting of the International Communication Association. Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lee, H. 2005. Behavioral strategies for dealing with flaming in an online forum. Sociological Quarterly 46(2):385–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Longacre, R.E. 1983. The grammar of discourse. New York, NY: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Paolillo, J. 2000b. Formalizing formality: An analysis of register variation in Sinhala. Journal of Linguistics 36:215–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Paolillo, J. 2008. Structure and network in the YouTube core. In Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, IEEE Computer Society. Los Alamitos, CA.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Spertus, E. 1997. Smokey: automatic recognition of hostile messages. In Proceedings of the 14th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1058–1065. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Strauss, A.L., and J.M. Corbin. 1998. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Turnage, A.K. 2007. Email flaming behaviors and organizational conflict. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13(1), article 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wasserman, S., and K. Faust. 1994. Social networks analysis: Application and methods. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yates, J., and W.J. Orlikowski. 1992. Genres of organizational communication: A structurational approach to studying communication and media. Academy of Management Review 17(2):299–326.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yates, J., W.J. Orlikowski, and J. Rennecker. 1997. Collaborative genres for collaboration: Genre systems in digital media. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, IEEE Computer Society. Los Alamitos, CA.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Yates, J., W.J. Orlikowski, and K. Okamura. 1999. Explicit and implicit structuring of genres in electronic communication: Reinforcement and change of social interaction. Organization Science 10(1):80–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • John C. Paolillo
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jonathan Warren
    • 1
  • Breanne Kunz
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Library and Information Science and School of InformaticsIndiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations