Mediated: The Image as a Performative Interface in the Photographic Relationship

  • Molly Samsell
Part of the Analecta Husserliana book series (ANHU, volume 106)


How can art, specifically photography, illustrate the limitations of vision? What do those limits reveal about perception and knowing? To explore these questions two distinct mechanisms need to be discussed in relation to creative practice, Paul Virilio’s augmenting lens that forever changes the photographer’s perception and the image acting as an object for both Maurice Merleau-Ponty’s embodied experience and Jean Baudrillard’s simulacrum. The photographic image becomes an index by exposing the relationship between photographer and image. The camera is a tool, to Virilio a prosthetic eye, which immediately affects the photographer’s perception of her environment. The phenomenal world is the one that is photographed, a subjective experience. The tension between surface and reality, image and object, removes the photographic experience from an experience of the real. The making of the image closely parallels the act of viewing the image. A dual experience emerges from the photograph, the creation of the image and the viewer’s act of reading, inferring. An image, as an index, is open to multiple interpretations, placing equal weight on each participant, viewer, and creator, so that there is no hierarchy of interpretation, experience, or meaning. These questions are explored in relation to a creative practice embedding theory with process and outcome.


Subject Shift Image Carrier Photographic Process Creative Practice Unique Moment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Baudrillard, Jean. Simulations. (New York: Semiotext(e), 1983).Google Scholar
  2. Deleuze, Gilles, and Guattari, Felix. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. (London: Continuum, 2004).Google Scholar
  3. Green, David, and Lowry, Joanna. “From Presence to the Performative: Rethinking Photographic Indexicality,” in Where Is the Photograph?, ed. David Green. (Brighton: Photoforum, 1993), pp. 47–60.Google Scholar
  4. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. Phenomenology of Perception. (London: Routledge, 1962).Google Scholar
  5. Peirce, Charles S. Collected Papers, 8 in 4 vols., ed. Charles Hartshorne and Paul Weiss (3rd Printing Edition). (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1931) Vol. 3–4.Google Scholar
  6. Probst, Barbara. Exposures, contrib. Karen Irvine, David Bate, Johannes Meinhardt, and Columbia College (Chicago, IL, 2007.), Museum of Contemporary Photography, London: Steidl.Google Scholar
  7. Selichar, Günther. Third Eye, ed. Martin Hochleitner. (Salzburg: Galerie Fotohof Salzburg, 2004).Google Scholar
  8. Virilio, Paul. The Vision Machine. (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1994).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.WellingtonNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations