Towards an Academic Social Network for Bologna Process

Conference paper

Abstract

The Bologna Process aimed to build a European Higher Education Area promoting student’s mobility. The adoption of Bologna Declaration directives requires a self management distributed approach to deal with student’s mobility, allowing frequent updates in institutions rules or legislation. This paper suggests a computational system architecture, which follows a social network design. A set of structured annotations is proposed in order to organize the user’s information. For instance, when the user is a student its annotations are organized into an academic record. The academic record data is used to discover interests, namely mobility interests, among students that belongs the academic network. These ideas have been applied into a demonstrator that includes a mobility simulator to compare and show the student’s academic evolution.

Keywords

Content Management System Ontology Service European High Education Area Bologna Process Academic Record 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    CRE et al, 2000. Confederation of EU Rectors’ Conferences and the Association of European Universities (CRE), 2000. The Bologna Declaration: an explanation.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    B..J. Krämer (2003), CUBER für die Ausbildung á la carte, in: G. Simonis (ed.), Lernort Bologna Declaration Communiqué of the meeting of European Ministers in charge of Higher Education,Prague,May 19th 2001, ec.europa.eu/education/policies/educ/bologna/bologna.pdf.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    T. O'Reilly. What Is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software, September 30, 2005. http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html>.
  4. [4]
    Web 2.0 Conferences. http://www.web2summit.com/ Wensing, M., Grol, R. and Smits, A. (1994) Quality judgements by patients on general practice care: a literature analysis. Social Science and Medicine 38, 45±53.
  5. [5]
    Tim Berners-Lee, Weaving the Web, Orion Business Books, London, 1999.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    van Harmelen, F., et al, “OWL Web Ontology Language Reference”, W3C Working Draft, http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-owl-ref-20030331/, 2003.
  7. [7]
    Miller, J., Mukerji, J. (eds.), “MDA Guide Version 1.0”, OMG Document:omg/2003-05-01,Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Paulo Trigo and Helder Coelho. Agent inferencing meets the semantic web. In Progress in Artificial Intelligence, EPIA-09, volume 5816 of Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (LNAI), pages 497-507. Springer-Verlag, 2009.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Handschuh, S., Staab, S. and Ciravogna, F., S-CREAM – Semi-automatic CREAtion of Metadata in SAAKM from Web Pages in First International Conference on Knowledge Capture, (2001).Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Hyvönen, E., Viljanen, K., Mäkelä, E., et al.: Elements of a national semantic content infrastructure—case Finland on the semantic web. In: Proceedings of the ICSC 2007, IEEE Press (2007).Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Valkeapää, O., Alm, O., Hyvönen, E.: Efficient content creation on the semantic web using metadata schemas with domain ontology services (system description). In: Proceedings of the ESWC 2007, Springer–Verlag, Berlin (2007).Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Paulos, J. and Costa, R. Bologna Application Suite. Final Year project available at www.deetc.isel.ipl.pt/matematica/jf/bas.pdf.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.GuIAA – DEETC - Instituto Superior de Engenharia de LisboaLisboaPortugal

Personalised recommendations