Advertisement

Multiuser Digital Games as Sites for Research and Practice

  • Julie M. Sykes
  • Jonathon Reinhardt
  • Steven L. Thorne
Chapter
Part of the Educational Linguistics book series (EDUL, volume 11)

Abstract

Digital games are significant for language learning not only as potentially useful new tools within the confines of traditional foreign language contexts, but more importantly, as new semiotic and cultural environments that construct, and are constructed by, social practices. In this chapter, we explore multiuser games as ontologically new social practices that warrant attention within the scope of language learning. In doing so, we specifically address two types of multiuser digital games—multiplayer online games (MMOGs) and synthetic immersive environments (SIEs)—and their role in research and practice. In terms of research, we suggest goal orientation and social consequence as two especially meaningful elements of multiuser digital games for language learning. We then highlight ways multiuser digital games might be meaningfully considered in educational practice. This includes a discussion of task-based approaches as well as literacy development.

Keywords

Social Practice Language Learning Game Design Online Game Digital Game 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Aarseth, Espen. 2003. Playing research: Methodological approaches to game analysis. DAC 2003. Melbourne. http://www.spilforskning.dk/gameapproaches/GameApproaches2.pdf. Accessed 17 March 2009.
  2. Aldrich, Clark. 2005. Learning by doing. San Francisco, CA: Wiley.Google Scholar
  3. Arnseth, Hans Christian. 2006. Learning to play or playing to learn - A critical account of the models of communication informing educational research on computer gameplay. Game Studies 6(1). http://gamestudies.org/0601/articles/arnseth. Accessed 18 February 2009.
  4. Barab, Sasha, Anne Arisi, and Craig Jackson. 2005. Eat your vegetables and do your homework: A design-based investigation of enjoyment and meaning in learning. Educational Technology 65: 15–21.Google Scholar
  5. Beck, John, and Mitchell Wade. 2004. Got game: How the gamer generation is reshaping business forever. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School.Google Scholar
  6. Belz, Julie, and Steven L. Thorne (eds.). 2006. Internet-mediated intercultural foreign language education. Boston, MA: Thomson Heinle.Google Scholar
  7. Blake, Robert. 2000. Computer mediated communication: A window on L2 Spanish interlanguage. Language Learning and Technology 4(1): 120–136.Google Scholar
  8. Block, David. 2007. Second language identities. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  9. Bryant, Todd. 2006. Using Word of Warcraft and other MMORPGs to foster a targeted, social, and cooperative approach toward language learning. Academic Commons, The Library. http://www.academiccommons.org/commons/essay/bryant-MMORPGs-for-SLA. Accessed 16 February 2008.
  10. Calleja, Gordon. 2007. Digital game involvement: A conceptual model. Games and Culture 2(3): 236–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Castronova, Edward. 2007. Exodus to the virtual world. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
  12. Castronova, Edward. 2001. Virtual worlds: A first-hand account of market and society on the cyberian frontier. CESifo Working Paper Series No. 618. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=294828. Accessed 18 October 2008.
  13. Cook, Guy. 2000. Language play, language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Crystal, David. 2001. Language play. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  15. Ducheneaut, Nicolas, Nicolas Yee, Eric Nickell, and Robert Moore. 2007. The life and death of online gaming communities: A look at guilds in World of Warcraft. CHI 2007 Proceedings, San Jose, CA.Google Scholar
  16. Ellis, Rod. 2003. Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Furstenberg, Gilbert, Sabine Levelt, Kathryn English, and Katherine Maillet. 2001. Giving a ­virtual voice to the silent language of culture: The CULTURA Project. Language Learning and Technology 5: 55–102.Google Scholar
  18. García-Carbonnell, Amparo, Beverly Rising, Begoña Montero, and Frances Watts. 2001. Simulations/gaming and the acquisition of communicative competence in another language. Simulation & Gaming 32: 481–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gee, James P. 2003. What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  20. Gee, James P. 2005. Why video games are good for your soul. Sydney, Australia: Common Ground.Google Scholar
  21. Gee, James P. 2007. What Video Games Have to Teach Us About Learning and Literacy, 2nd ed. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  22. Juul, Jesper. 2005. Half-real: Video games between real rules and fictional worlds. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  23. Kramsch, Claire. 1993. Context and culture in language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Kramsch, Claire, and Sally McConnell-Ginet. 1992. Text and context: Cross-disciplinary ­perspectives on language study. Canada: Heath and Company.Google Scholar
  25. Kress, Gunther. 2003. Literacy in the new media age. London: Routledge/Falmer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lankshear, Colin, and Michele Knobel. 2006. New literacies: Changing knowledge and classroom learning, 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Lankshear, Colin, and Michele Knobel. 2007. Sampling “the new” in new literacies. In A new literacies sampler, ed. Colin Lankshear and Michele Knobel, 1–24. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  28. Lantolf, James. 1997. Language play and the acquisition of L2 Spanish. In Contemporary ­perspectives on the acquisition of Spanish. Volume 2: Production, processing and comprehension, ed. William Glass and Ana Teresa Perez-Leroux, 3–24. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla.Google Scholar
  29. Lantolf, James, and Steven L. Thorne. 2006. Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second ­language development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Lee, Joey, and Chris Hoadley. 2007. Leveraging identity to make learning fun: Possible selves and experiential learning in massively multiplayer online games (MMOGs). Innovate 3(6). http://innovateonline.info/index.php?view=article%id=348Google Scholar
  31. Lenhart, Amanda, Joseph Kahne, Ellen Middaugh, Alexandra Macgill, Chris Evans, and Jessica Vitak. 2008. Teens, video games, and civics. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project. http://www.pewinternet.org. Accessed 14 October 2008.
  32. Miller, Megan, and Volker Hegelheimer. 2006. The SIMS meet ESL: Incorporating authentic computer simulation games into the language classroom. Interactive Technology & Smart Education 4: 311–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Murray, Janet. 2004. From game-story to cyberdrama. In First person: New media as story, ­performance, and game, ed. Noah Wardrip-Fruin and Pat Harrigan, 2–11. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  34. Nardi, Bonnie, Stella Ly, and Justin Harris. 2007. Learning conversations in World of Warcraft. In The Proceedings of the 2007 Hawaii International Conference on Systems Science. New York: IEEE Press.Google Scholar
  35. National Summit on Educational Gaming. 2005. National Summit on Educational Games Fact Sheet. www.fas.org/gamesummit/Resources/Fact%20Sheet.pdf. Accessed 15 March 2008.
  36. New London Group. 1996. A pedagogy of multiliteracies. Harvard Educational Review 66(1): 60–92.Google Scholar
  37. Peña, Jorge, and Jeffrey Hancock. 2006. An analysis of socioemotional and task communication in online multiplayer video games. Communication Research 33(1): 92–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pica, Teresa, Ruth Kanagy, and Joseph Falodun. 1993. Choosing and using communication tasks for second language instruction. In Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice. Volume 1, ed. Grahm Crookes and Susan Gass, 9–34. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  39. Prensky, Mark. 2001. Digital game-based learning. St. Paul, MN: Paragon House.Google Scholar
  40. Prensky, Mark. 2005. Computer games and learning: Digital game-based learning. In Handbook of computer game studies, ed. Joost Raessens and Jeffrey Goldstein, 97–122. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  41. Purushotma, Ravi. 2005. You’re not studying, you’re just.. Language Learning and Technology 9(1): 80–96.Google Scholar
  42. Purushotma, Ravi, Steven L. Thorne, and Julien Wheatley. 2008. Language learning and video games. Paper produced for the Open Language & Learning Games Project, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, funded by the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation. http://knol.google.com/k/ravi-purushotma/10-key-principles-for-designing-video/27mkxqba7b13d/2. Accessed 10 May 2009.
  43. Ranalli, Jim. 2008. Learning English with The Sims: Exploiting authentic computer simulation games for L2 learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning 5: 441–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Richards, Jack, and Theodore Rodgers. 2001. Approaches and methods in language teaching. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Salen, Katie, and Eric Zimmerman. 2005. Game design and meaningful play. In Handbook of computer game studies, ed. Joost Raessens and Jeffrey Goldstein, 59–80. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  46. Salmani-Nodoushan, Mohammad Ali. 2007. Greeting forms in English and Persian: A socio-pragmatic perspective. Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences 4(3): 355–2007.Google Scholar
  47. Sawyer, Ben, and Peter Smith. 2008. Serious games taxonomy. Serious Games Initiative. http://www.dmill.com/presentations/serious-games-taxonomy-2008.pdf. Accessed 15 March 2008.
  48. Shaffer, David, and Katherine Clinton. 2006. Toolsforthoughts: Reexamining thinking in the ­digital age. Mind, Culture, and Activity 13(4): 283–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Smith, Bryan. 2004. Computer-mediated negotiated interaction and lexical acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 26: 365–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Smith, Harvey. 2003. Orthogonal unit differentiation. Presentation at Game Developers Conference, 2003.Google Scholar
  51. Squire, Kurt D., and Constance Steinkuehler. 2006. Generating CyberCulture/s: The case of Star Wars Galaxies. In Cyberlines 2.0 languages and cultures of the internet, ed. Donna Gibbs and Kerri-Lee Krause, 177–198. Albert Park, Australia: James Nicholas Publishers.Google Scholar
  52. Steinkuehler, Constance. 2006. Massively multiplayer online videogaming as participation in a discourse. Mind, Culture, & Activity 13(1): 38–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Steinkuehler, Constance. 2007. Massively multiplayer online gaming as a constellation of literacy practices. eLearning 4: 297–318.Google Scholar
  54. Steinkuehler, Constance. 2008. Massively multiplayer online games as an educational technology: An outline for research. Educational Technology 48(1): 10–21.Google Scholar
  55. Sykes, Julie. 2008. A dynamic approach to social interaction: Synthetic immersive environments and Spanish pragmatics. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Spanish and Portuguese. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
  56. Sykes, Julie. 2009. Learner requests in Spanish: Examining the potential of multiuser virtual environments for L2 pragmatic acquisition. In The second generation: Online collaboration and social networking in CALL, eds. Lara Lomika and Gillian Lord. CALICO Monograph.Google Scholar
  57. Sykes, Julie, Ana Oskoz, and Steven L. Thorne. 2008. Web 2.0, synthetic immersive environments, and the future of language education. CALICO 25(3): 528–546.Google Scholar
  58. Tarone, Elaine. 2000. Getting serious about language play: Language play, interlanguage variation and second language acquisition. In Social and cognitive factors in second language acquisition. Selected proceedings of the 1999 SLRF, ed. Bonnie Swierzbin, Frank Morris, Michael E. Anderson, Carol A. Klee, and Elaine Tarone, 31–54. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla.Google Scholar
  59. Taylor, T.L. 2006. Play between worlds: Exploring online game culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  60. Terdiman, Daniel. 2008. ‘Spore’ hits a million copies sold since launch’. Cnet News. September 24, 2008. http://news.cnet.com/8301-13772_3-10050147-52.html.
  61. Thorne, Steven L. 2003. Artifacts and cultures-of-use in intercultural communication. Language Learning & Technology 7(2): 38–67.Google Scholar
  62. Thorne, Steven L. 2006. Pedagogical and praxiological lessons from internet-mediated intercultural foreign language education research. In Internet-mediated intercultural foreign language education, ed. Julie Belz and Steven L. Thorne, 2–30. Boston: Thomson and Heinle.Google Scholar
  63. Thorne, Steven L. 2008. Transcultural communication in open internet environments and ­massively multiplayer online games. In Mediating discourse online, ed. Sally Magnan, ­305–327. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  64. Thorne, Steven L. 2009. ‘Community’, semiotic flows, and mediated contribution to activity. Language Teaching 42(1): 81–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Thorne, Steven L., and Rebecca Black. 2007. Language and literacy development in computer-mediated contexts and communities. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 27: 133–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Thorne, Steven L., and Jonathon Reinhardt. 2008. Bridging activities, new media literacies, and advanced foreign language proficiency. CALICO Journal 25(3): 558–572.Google Scholar
  67. Thorne, Steven L., Rebecca W. Black, and Julie M. Sykes. 2009. Second language use, socialization, and learning in Internet communities and online games. Modern Language Journal 93(1): 802–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Thorne, Steven L., and Rebecca W. Black. forthcoming. Identity and interaction in Internet-mediated contexts. In Negotiating the self in a second language: Identity formation and cross-cultural adaptation in a globalizing world, ed. Christina Higgins. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  69. Vygotsky, Lev S. 1978. Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Julie M. Sykes
    • 1
  • Jonathon Reinhardt
    • 2
  • Steven L. Thorne
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.University of New MexicoAlbuquerqueUSA
  2. 2.University of ArizonaTucsonUSA
  3. 3.Portland State UniversityPortlandUSA
  4. 4.University of GroningenGroningenNetherlands

Personalised recommendations