Abstract
If farmers are to manage the soil–crop system efficiently through variable application of fertilizers within fields they require information of the within-field variation of soil properties. To ensure that precision agriculture is cost-effective, soil sampling must be as efficient as possible. This chapter demonstrates the potential to optimize the design of soil sampling schemes if the variation of the target property is represented by a linear mixed model. If the parameters of the model are known prior to sampling we see that it is possible to optimize the sampling design with a numerical algorithm known as spatial simulated annealing. In general the parameters are unknown when the sample scheme is designed and the model is fitted to the observations. However it can be sufficient to assume a model which was fitted to a previous survey of the target variable over a similar landscape. When we do not have existing information about the variation of the target variable multi-phase adaptive sampling schemes may be used. We describe such a scheme for a survey of top-soil water content. The data are analysed as they are collected, and the sample design is modified to ensure that it is suitable for the particular target variable. The technologies described in this chapter represent the state of the art for sampling design in the geostatistical context. We discuss the developments required for them to be implemented as standard tools for precision agriculture.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Aarts, E., & Korst, J. (1989).Simulated annealing and Boltzmann machines – A stochastic approach to combinatorial optimization and neural computing. New York: Wiley.
Adamchuk, V. I., Lund, E. D., Sethuramasamyraja, B., Morgan, M. T., Doberman, A., & Marx, D. B. (2005). Direct measurement of soil chemical properties on-the-go using ion-selective electrodes.Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 48, 272–294.
Adsett, J. F., Thottan, J. A., & Sibley, K. J. (1999). Development of an automated on-the-go soil nitrate monitoring system.Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 15, 351–356.
Brus, D. J., & de Gruijter, J. J. (1997). Random sampling or geostatistical modelling? Choosing between design-based and model-based sampling strategies for soil (with discussion).Geoderma, 80, 1–44.
Brus, D. J., & Heuvelink, G. B. M. (2007). Optimization of sample patterns for universal kriging of environmental variables.Geoderma, 138, 86–95.
Delta-T Devices. (1999).Theta probe moisture sensor type ML2x user manual. Cambridge: Delta-T Devices.
Demougeot-Renard, H., de Fouquet, C., & Fritsch, M. (2004). Optimizing sampling for acceptable accuracy levels on remediation and cost estimations: an iterative approach, based on geostatistical methods, illustrated on a former smelting works polluted with lead. In X. Sanchez Vila, J. Carrera & J. J. Gomez Hernandez (Eds.),GEOENV IV – Geostatistics for environmental applications: Proceedings (pp. 283–294).Book series: Quantitative geology and geostatistics 13. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Diggle, P. J., & Ribeiro Jr., P. J. (2007).Model-based geostatistics. New York: Springer.
Dobson, A. J. (1990).An introduction to generalized linear models (2nd ed.). London: Chapman and Hall.
Kirkpatrick, S., Gellat, C. D., & Vecchi, M. P. (1983). Optimisation by simulated annealing.Science, 220, 671–680.
Kitanidis, P. K. (1985). Minimum-variance unbiased quadratic estimation of covariances of regionalized variables.Journal of the International Association of Mathematical Geology, 17, 195–208.
Kitanidis, P. K. (1987). Parametric estimation of covariances of regionalised variables.Water Resources Bulletin, 23, 557–567.
Lark, R. M. (2002). Optimized spatial sampling of soil for estimation of the variogram by maximum likelihood.Geoderma, 105, 49–80.
Lark, R. M., & Papritz, A. (2003). Fitting a linear model of coregionalization for soil properties using simulated annealing.Geoderma, 115, 245–260.
Lark, R. M., Cullis, B. R., & Welham, S. J. (2006). On spatial prediction of soil properties in the presence of a spatial trend: the empirical best linear unbiased predictor (E-BLUP) with REML.European Journal of Soil Science, 57, 787–799.
Marchant, B. P., & Lark, R. M. (2004). Estimating variogram uncertainty.Journal of the International Association of Mathematical Geology, 36, 867–898.
Marchant, B. P., & Lark, R. M. (2006). Adaptive sampling for reconnaissance surveys for geostatistical mapping of the soil.European Journal of Soil Science, 57, 831–845.
Marchant, B. P., & Lark, R. M. (2007). Optimized sample schemes for geostatistical surveys.Journal of the International Association of Mathematical Geology, 39, 113–134.
McBratney, A. B., Webster, R., & Burgess, T. M. (1981). The design of optimal sampling schemes for local estimation and mapping of regionalised variables.Computers and Geosciences, 7, 331–334.
Pardo-Igúzquiza, E. (1998). Maximum likelihood estimation of spatial covariance parameters.Journal of the International Association of Mathematical Geology, 30, 95–108.
Pardo-Igúzquiza, E., & Dowd, P. A. (2003). Assessment of the uncertainty of spatial covariance parameters of soil properties and its use in applications.Soil Science, 168, 769–782.
Patterson, H. D., & Thompson, R. (1971). Recovery of inter-block information when block sizes are unequal.Biometrika, 58, 545–554.
Press, W. H., Teukolsky, S. A., Vetterling, W. T., & Flannery, B. P. (1992).Numerical recipes (Fortran) (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stein, M. L. (1999).Interpolation of spatial data: Some theory for Kriging. New York: Springer.
Van Groenigen, J. W., Siderius, W., & Stein, A. (1999). Constrained optimisation of soil sampling for minimisation of the kriging variance.Geoderma, 87, 239–259.
Viscarra Rossel, R. A., Gilbertson, M., Thylen, L., Hansen, O., McVey, S., & McBratney, A. B. (2005). Field measurements of soil pH and lime requirement using an on-the-go soil pH and lime requirement measurement system. In J. V. Stafford (Ed.),Precision agriculture 05, Proceedings of the 5th European conference on precision agriculture (pp. 511–520). Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers.
Webster, R., & Oliver, M. A. (2007).Geostatistics for environmental scientists (2nd ed.). Chichester: Wiley.
Zhu, Z., & Stein, M. (2006). Spatial sampling design for prediction with estimated parameters.Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, 11, 24–44.
Zimmerman, D. L., & Cressie, N. (1992). Mean squared prediction error in the spatial linear model with estimated covariance parameters.Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 44, 27–43.
Acknowledgements
The work reported in this chapter was largely undertaken in a project funded by the United Kingdom’s Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC), Grant 204/D15335, as part of an Industry Partnership Award with the Home-Grown Cereals Authority (Grant 2453). BPM and RML are funded by the BBSRC in the Mathematical and Computational Biology programme at Rothamsted Research. We are grateful to Miss Helen Wheeler and Mr Peter Richards for their contribution to the development and operation of the field system. Figures 3.1 and 3.3–3.7 are reproduced from Marchant and Lark (2006) by kind permission of Wiley-Blackwell. Figure 3.2 is reproduced from Marchant and Lark (2007) by kind permission of Springer Science and Business Media.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Netherlands
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Marchant, B.P., Lark, R.M. (2010). Sampling in Precision Agriculture, Optimal Designs from Uncertain Models. In: Oliver, M. (eds) Geostatistical Applications for Precision Agriculture. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9133-8_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9133-8_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-9132-1
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-9133-8
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)