Abstract
Structural Realism (SR) is a moderate variant of scientific realism and can roughly be captured by the idea that we should be committed to the structural rather than object-like content of our best current scientific theories. A quick view on the list of some of the main proponents shows that SR is basically a European philosophy of science movement (and just suits our ESF Programme): John Worrall, Ioannis Votsis, Steven French, Angelo Cei, James Ladyman, Simon Saunders, Michael Esfeld, Vincent Lam, Katherine Brading, Mauro Dorato, Dean Rickles, Fred Muller, and – exceptions prove the rule – Anjan Chakravartty and John Stachel. The list is of course not exhaustive, moreover, the debate has a broad periphery. A notable example of this is Bas van Fraassen’s structural empiricism. The paper is a kind of opinionated review paper. In what follows I will pass through the most prevailing topics in recent debates over SR. My discussion will be organised, perhaps a bit unorthodoxly, in short sections, here and then I will outline my own views.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Tian Yu Cao (2003). Structural realism and the interpretation of quantum field theory. Synthese 136: 3–24.
Angelo Cei and Steven French (2006). Looking for structure in all the wrong places: Ramsey sentences, multiple realizability, and structure. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 37: 633–655.
Anjan Chakravartty (2004). Structuralism as a form of scientific realism. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 18 (2 & 3): 151-171.
Anjan Chakravartty (2007). A Metaphysics for Scientific Realism: Knowing the Unobservable. New York: Cambridge University Press.
William Demopoulos and Michael Friedman (1985). Critical notice: Bertrand Russell’s The Analysis of Matter: Its historical context and contemporary interest. Philosophy of Science 52: 621–639.
Mauro Dorato (2000). Substantivalism, relationism and structural spacetime realism. Foundations of Physics 30(10): 1605-28.
Phil Dowe (2000). Physical Causation. New York: Cambridge University Press
Michael Esfeld (2004). Quantum entanglement and a metaphysics of relations. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 35(4): 601-617.
Michael Esfeld (in print). The modal nature of structures in ontic structural realism. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science.
Michael Esfeld and Vincent Lam (2008). Moderate structural realism about spacetime. Synthese 160: 27-46.
Bas van Fraassen (2008). Scientific Representation: Paradoxes of Perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.
Steven French (1989). Identity and individuality in classical and quantum physics. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 67: 432–446.
Steven French (1998). On the withering away of physical objects. In Elena Castellani (ed.): Interpreting Bodies: Classical and Quantum Objects in Modern Physics, pp. 93–113. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Steven French and James Ladyman (2003a). Remodelling structural realism: Quantum physics and the metaphysics of structure. Synthese 136: 31–56.
Steven French and James Ladyman (2003b). Between platonism and phenomenalism: Reply to Cao. Synthese 136: 73–78.
Steven French (2006). Structure as a weapon of the realist. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 106: 167–85.
Richard Healey (2007). Gauging What’s Real: The Conceptual Foundations of Contemporary Gauge Theories. New York: Oxford University Press.
James Ladyman and Don Ross (with David Spurrett and John Collier) (2007). Every Thing Must Go: Metaphysics Naturalised. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rae Langton (1998). Kantian Humility: Our Ignorance of Things in Themselves. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
David Lewis (1970). How to define theoretical terms. Journal of Philosophy 67: 427–446.
David Lewis (1986). Philosophical Papers Vol. II. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
David Lewis (2009). Ramseyan Humility. In David Braddon-Mitchell and Robert Nola (eds.): Conceptual Analysis and Philosophical Naturalism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Holger Lyre (2004a). Lokale Symmetrien und Wirklichkeit. Paderborn: Mentis.
Holger Lyre (2004b). Holism and structuralism in U(1) gauge theory. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 35(4): 643-670.
Holger Lyre (2009). Structural realism and abductive-transcendental arguments. In Michel Bitbol, Pierre Kerszberg and Jean Petitot (eds.): Constituting Objectivity. Transcendental Perspectives on Modern Physics. Berlin: Springer.
Holger Lyre (in print). Is structural underdetermination possible? Synthese.
Tim Maudlin (2007): The Metaphysics Within Physics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Fred Muller (1998). Structures for Everyone. Amsterdam: Gerits & Son. Fred Muller (in print). Withering away, weakly. Synthese.
Max Newman (1928). Mr. Russell’s “Causal Theory of Perception”. Mind 37(146): 137-148.
Willard V. O. Quine (1976). Grades of discriminability. Journal of Philosophy 73(5): 113-116.
Michael Redhead (2001). The intelligibility of the universe. In: Anthony O’Hear (ed.): Philosophy at the New Millennium. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dean Rickles, Steven French and Juha Saatsi (2006). The Structural Foundations of Quantum Gravity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bertrand Russell (1927). The Analysis of Matter. London: George Allen & Unwin.
Simon Saunders (2003). Structural realism again. Synthese 136: 127–133.
Simon Saunders (2006). Are quantum particles objects? Analysis 66: 52–63.
Jonathan Schaffer (2005). Quiddistic knowledge. Philosophical Studies 123: 1–32.
Stewart Shapiro (2000). Thinking about Mathematics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Georg Sparber (2009). Unorthodox Humeanism. Frankfurt a.M.: Ontos.
John Stachel (2002). The relations between things versus the things between relations: The deeper meaning of the hole argument. In: David Malament (ed.): Reading Natural Philosophy: Essays in the History and Philosophy of Science and Mathematics. La Salle, IL: Open Court.
Ioannis Votsis (2003). Is structure not enough? Philosophy of Science 70: 879– 890.
John Worrall (1989). Structural realism: The best of both worlds? Dialectica 43: 99–124.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Netherlands
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lyre, H. (2010). Humean Perspectives on Structural Realism. In: Stadler, F. (eds) The Present Situation in the Philosophy of Science. The Philosophy of Science in a European Perspective, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9115-4_27
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9115-4_27
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-9114-7
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-9115-4
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)