The Problem of Constrained Judgment Aggregation
- 861 Downloads
Group decisions must often obey exogenous constraints. While in a preference aggregation problem constraints are modelled by restricting the set of feasible alternatives, this paper discusses the modelling of constraints when aggregating individual yes/no judgments on interconnected propositions. For example, court judgments in breach-of-contract cases should respect the constraint that action and obligation are necessary and sufficient for liability, and judgments on budget items should respect budgetary constraints. In this paper, we make constraints in judgment aggregation explicit by relativizing the rationality conditions of consistency and deductive closure to a constraint set, whose variation yields more or less strong notions of rationality. This approach of modelling constraints explicitly contrasts with that of building constraints as axioms into the logic, which turns compliance with constraints into a matter of logical consistency and thereby conflates requirements of ordinary logical consistency (such as not to affirm both a proposition and its negation) and requirements dictated by the environment (such as budgetary constraints). We present some general impossibility results on constrained judgment aggregation; they are immediate corollaries of known results on (unconstrained) judgment aggregation.
KeywordsBinary Relation Social Choice Aggregation Function Balance Budget Judgment Aggregation
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Dietrich (forthcoming), The possibility of judgment aggregation on agendas with subjunctive implications, Journal of Economic Theory Google Scholar
- Dietrich F., List C. (2007b), Judgment aggregation with consistency alone, Working paper, London School of EconomicsGoogle Scholar
- Dietrich F., List, C. (2008a), Judgment aggregation under constraints, in: Economics, Rational Choice and Normative Philosophy, T. Boylan and R. Gekker (eds.), London (Routledge)Google Scholar
- Dokow E., Holzman R (forthcoming) Aggregation of binary evaluations, Working paper, Technion Israel Institute of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
- Dokow E., Holzman R. (2006), Aggregation of binary evaluations with abstentions. Working paper, Technion Israel Institute of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
- List C. (2004-7), Judgment aggregation: a bibliography on the discursive dilemma, doctrinal paradox and decisions on multiple propositions. Available at http://personal.lse.ac.uk/list/
- List C., Pettit P. (2002), Aggregating Sets of Judgments: An Impossibility Result. Economics and Philosophy 18: 89-110Google Scholar
- List C., Pettit P. (2001/2004), Aggregating Sets of Judgments: Two Impossibility Results Compared. Social and Political Theory Paper W20 (technical report ID 931), Australian National University; Synthese 140(1-2): 207-235Google Scholar
- Nehring K., Puppe C. (2002), Strategyproof Social Choice on Single-Peaked Domains: Possibility, Impossibility and the Space Between. Working paper, University of California at DavisGoogle Scholar