Experiences of E-Learning and Its Delivery Among Learners Who Work: A Systematic Review

  • Christopher Carroll
  • Andrew Booth
  • Diana Papaioannou
  • Anthea Sutton
Chapter
Part of the Professional and Practice-based Learning book series (PPBL, volume 5)

Abstract

The development of educational opportunities among learners who work is increasingly recognised as an important mechanism in transferring skills and knowledge from the academic environment and embedding them within working practice. This review aims to explore and describe the experience of e-learning among students in employment. A systematic review and thematic analysis of studies evaluating the experience of online learning among working learners in the UK. Literature searches identified 41 relevant studies. Five key themes emerged from the data that influenced the learning experience of students: peer communication; support; flexibility; knowledge validation; and course presentation and design. Given that the effectiveness of online learning is mediated by the learning experience, course designers and providers need to take careful account of these issues if they are to enhance working learners' experience of e-learning. This synthesis offers a new means for understanding the experience of online learning for those in formal employment, which can be used to inform the delivery of such courses.

Keywords

Systematic review Thematic analysis E-Learning Online learning Situated learning Moderated learning Working students Higher Education Qualitative Studies Student Experience United Kingdom 

References

  1. Allan, B., & Lewis, D. (2006). Virtual learning communities as a vehicle for workforce development: A case study. Journal of Workplace Learning, 18(6), 367–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen, M., Bourhis, J., Burrell, N., & Mabry, E. (2002). Comparing student satisfaction with distance education to traditional classrooms in higher education: A meta-analysis. American Journal of Distance Education, 16(2), 83–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anonymous (2001). Inverness College: Innovations in aquaculture training. Report from ED467205.7.Google Scholar
  4. Anthony, D. (2006). Online courses in nursing and midwifery: Comparisons with allied healthcare professions. British Journal of Healthcare Computing and Information Management, 20(1), 28–30.Google Scholar
  5. Anthony, D., & Duffy, K. (2003). An evaluation of a tissue viability online course. ITIN 15(4), 20–28.Google Scholar
  6. Atkins, C., & Sampson, J. (2002). Critical appraisal guidelines for single case study research. Proceedings of ECIS 2002. The Xth European Conference on Information Systems, Gdansk, 6–8 June.Google Scholar
  7. Bacigalupo, R., Bath, P., Booth, A., Eaglestone, B., Levy, P., & Procter, P. (2003). Studying health informatics from a distance: The impact of a multimedia case study, Health Informatics Journal, 9(1), 5–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bahn, D., Needham, Y., & Marsh, D. (2001). Using the web to develop an EN conversion course. Nursing Standard, 15(26), 37–40.Google Scholar
  9. Bird, L. (2001). Virtual Learning in the workplace: The power of communities of practice”. Report from ED467924.9.Google Scholar
  10. Booth, A., Ayiku, L., Sutton, A., & O’Rourke, A. (2005). Fulfilling a yearning for e-learning? Fun, collaborative courses for NHS support staff. Library & Information Update, 4(10), 27–29.Google Scholar
  11. Bosley, S., & Young, S. (2006). On line learning dialogues in learning through work. Journal of Workplace Learning, 18(6), 355–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Boynton, P. (2004). Hands-on guide to questionnaire research: Selecting, designing, and developing your questionnaire. British Medical Journal, 328(7451), 1312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brosnan, K., & Burgess, R. (2003). Web based continuing professional development – A learning architecture approach. Journal of Workplace Learning, 15(1), 24–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bruner, J. (1982). The relevance of education. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  15. Bury, R., Martin, L., & Roberts, S. (2006). Achieving change through mutual development: Supported online learning and evolving roles of health and information professionals. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 23(S1), 22–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cahill, D., Cook, J., & Jenkins, J. (2003). How useful are World Wide Web discussion boards and email in delivering a case study course in reproductive medicine. In C. Ghaoui (Ed.), Usability evaluation of online learning programs (pp. 360–370). London: Information Science.Google Scholar
  17. Carroll-Barefield, A., & Murdoch, C. (2004). Using online learning to enhance interdisciplinary education. Journal of Allied Health, 33(1), 78–81.Google Scholar
  18. Chadda, D. (2000). Cyberschool days. Health Service Journal, 24(3), 5–6.Google Scholar
  19. Childs, S., Blenkinsopp, E., Hall, A., & Walton, G. (2005). Effective e-learning for health professionals and students – barriers and their solutions. A systematic review of the literature—findings from the HeXL project. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 22(S2), 20–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Clarke, A., Lewis, D., Cole, I., & Ringrose, L. (2005). A strategic approach to developing e-learning capability for healthcare. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 22(S2), 33–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Collis, B., & van der Wende, M. (Eds.). (2002). ICT and the internationalisation of higher education: Models of change. Special Issue of the Journal for Studies in International Education.Google Scholar
  22. Conole, G., Hall, M., & Smith, S. (2002). An evaluation of an online course for medical practitioners. Education, Technology and Society, 5, 66–75.Google Scholar
  23. Coultas, J., Luckin, R., & du Boulay, B. (2003). How compelling is the evidence for the effectiveness of e-Learning in the post-16 sector? Retrieved May 28, 2009, from http://www.reveel.sussex.ac.uk/files/ConsultES204.pdf
  24. Department of Health (2000). The NHS plan. DH, London: Department of Health.Google Scholar
  25. Department of Health (2001). Working together, learning together: A framework for lifelong learning in the NHS. Leeds: Department of Health.Google Scholar
  26. Dixon-Woods, M., Shaw, R., Agarwal, S., Smith, J. (2004). The problem of appraising qualitative research. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 13(3), 223–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dixon-Woods, M., Sutton, A., Shaw, R., Miller, T., Smith, Young., B et al. (2007). Appraising qualitative research for inclusion in systematic reviews: A quantitative and qualitative comparison of three methods. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 12, 42–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Forsyth, R. (2002). Making professional development flexible: A case study. Open Learning, 17(3), 251–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gresty, K., Skirton, H., & Evenden, A. (2007). Addressing the issue of e-learning and online genetics for health professionals. Nursing and Health Sciences, 9(1), 14–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hall, N., Harvey, P., Meerabeau, L., & Muggleston, D. (2004). An evaluation of online training in the NHS workplace. London: University of Greenwich.Google Scholar
  31. Hare, C., Davies, C., & Shepherd, M. (2006). Safer medicine administration through the use of e-learning. Nursing Times, 102(16), 25–27.Google Scholar
  32. Haynes, P., Ip, K., Saintas, P., Stanier, S., Palmer, H., Thomas, N., et al. (2004). Responding to technological change: IT skills and the academic teaching profession. Active Learning in Higher Education, 5, 152–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hodgson, V., & Reynolds P. (2005). Consensus, difference and multiple communities in networked learning, Studies in Higher Education, 30(1), 11–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hurst, J. (2005). Evaluating staff and student experiences of multidisciplinary continuous professional development via distance-learning. EDINA/ERCA Journal, 31, 160–163.Google Scholar
  35. Innes, A., Mackay, K., & McCabe, L. (2006). Dementia studies online: Reflections on the opportunities and drawbacks of eLearning. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 58(3), 303–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Irving, M., Irving, R., & Sutherland, S. (2007). Graseby MS16A and MS26 syringe drivers: Reported effectiveness of an online learning programme. International Journal of Palliative Nursing, 13(2), 56–62.Google Scholar
  37. Jenkins, J., Cook, J., Edwards, J., Draycott, T., & Cahill, D. (2001). A pilot internet training programme in reproductive medicine. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 108, 114–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. JISC (2007). E-learning. Retrieved May 28, 2009, from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/whatwedo/themes/elearning.aspx
  39. Jones, S., & McCann, J. (2005). Virtual learning environments for time-stressed and peripatetic managers. Journal of Workplace Learning, 17(5/6), 359–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kear, K. (2004). Peer learning using asynchronous discussion systems in distance education. Open Learning, 19(2), 151–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kinghorn, S. (2005). Electronic learning. Delivering multiprofessional web-based psychosocial education: The lessons learnt. International Journal of Palliative Nursing, 11(8), 432–437.Google Scholar
  42. Lain, D., & Aston, J. (2005). Literature review of evidence on e-Learning in the workplace. IES occasional paper. Retrieved May 28, 2009, from http://www.employment-studies.co.uk/pdflibrary/01580.pdf
  43. Larsen, T., Jenkins, L. (2005). Evaluation of online learning module about sickness certification for general practitioners. Leeds: Department of Work and Pensions.Google Scholar
  44. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate, peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Lee, S., & Patterson, L. (2003). Supporting e-learners 24x7 throughout Wales and beyond. SCONUL Newsletter, 29, 48–53.Google Scholar
  46. Littleton, K., & Whitelock, D. (2004). Guiding the creation of knowledge and understanding in a virtual learning environment. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7(2), 173–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lu, J., Yu, C.-S., & Liu, C. (2003). Learning style, learning patterns, and learning performance in a WebCT-based MIS course. Information & Management, 40(6), 497–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Macpherson, A., Homan, G., & Wilkinson, K. (2005). The implementation and use of e-learning in the corporate university. Journal of Workplace Learning, 17(2), 33–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Miles, J., & Huberman, L. (1984). Qualitative data analysis: A source book of new methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  50. Milligan, C. (1998) The role of virtual learning environments in the online delivery of staff development. Report 1: Review of experiences of delivering TALi SMAN online courses. Joint information systems committees technology applications programme, 39.Google Scholar
  51. Moher, D., Cook, D., Eastwood, S., Olkin, I., Rennie, D., Stroup, D. (1999). Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: The QUOROM statement. The Lancet, 854, 1896–1900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Morgan, J., Rawlinson, M., & Weaver, M. (2006). Facilitating online reflective learning for health and social care professionals. Open Learning, 21(2), 167–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (2009). Systematic reviews. CRD’s guidance for undertaking reviews in health care. York: University of York.Google Scholar
  54. Peachey, P. (2004). An addictive property of the discussion forums of the VLE as perceived by students undertaking a web-based course. Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Annual Conference, University of Manchester, 16–18 September.Google Scholar
  55. Pegler, C. (2005) Objects and issues – A Sunday supplement view of continuing professional development in higher education. Open Learning, 20(1), 51–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Popay, J., Rogers, A., & Williams, G. (1998). Rationale and standards for the systematic review of qualitative literature in health services research. Qualitative Health Research, 8, 341–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Salmon, G. (2003). E-moderating: The key to teaching and learning online (2nd ed.). London: Kogan Page Limited.Google Scholar
  58. Sandars, J., Langlois, M., & Waterman, H. (2007). Online collaborative learning for healthcare continuing professional development: A cross-case analysis of three case studies. Medical Teacher, 29(1), E9–E17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Schweizer, H. (2004) E-Learning in business. Journal of Management Education, 28(6), 674–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Stephenson, J. (2003). A review of research and practice in e-learning in the workplace and proposals for its effective use. American Education Research Association. Retrieved May 9, 2009, from http://www.iclml.co.uk
  61. Stephenson, J., & Saxton, J. (2005). Using the internet to gain personalized degrees from learning through work: Some experience from Ufi. Industry and Higher Education, 19(3), 249–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sutton, A., Booth, A., Ayiku, L., & O’Rourke, A. (2005). e-FOLIO: Using elearning to learn about e-learning. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 22(S2), 84–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Terrell, I., Revill, G., & Down, J. (2004). Developing the role and effectiveness of teacher support staff through an innovative online graduate programme. Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association’s Annual Conference, University of Manchester. 16–18 September.Google Scholar
  64. Thompson, D., & Homer, G. (2000). Delivering web based IT training in a rural environment. Information Services & Use, 20, 139–143.Google Scholar
  65. Thorley, K., Turner, S., Hussey, L., Zarin, N., & Agius, R. (2007). CPD for GPs using the THOR-GP website. Occupational Medicine, 57, 575–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Thorpe, M., & Godwin, S. (2006). Interaction and e-learning: The student experience. Studies in Continuing Education, 28(3), 203–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Tong, A., Sainsbury, P., & Craig, J. (2007) Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 19(6), 349–357.Google Scholar
  68. Treharne, R., & McClelland, S. (2004). Findings from a venture into elearning in NHS Wales. British Journal of Healthcare Computing & Information Management, 21(1), 33–35.Google Scholar
  69. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  70. Whittington, K., Cook, J., Barratt, C., Jenkins, J., Whittington, K., Cook, J., et al. (2004). Can the internet widen participation in reproductive medicine education for professionals? Human Reproduction, 19(8), 1800–1805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Wilkinson, A., Forbes, A., Bloomfield, J., Fincham, G., Wilkinson, A., Forbes, A., et al. (2004). An exploration of four web-based open and flexible learning modules in post-registration nurse education. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 41(4), 411–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Williams, P., Nicholas, D., & Gunter, B. (2005). E-learning: What the literature tells us about distance education. An overview. Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives, 57(2), 109–122.Google Scholar
  73. Wutoh, R., Boren, S., & Balas, E. (2004). eLearning: A review of Internet-based continuing medical education. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 24(1), 20–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V.  2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christopher Carroll
    • 1
  • Andrew Booth
    • 1
  • Diana Papaioannou
    • 1
  • Anthea Sutton
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Sheffield, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR)SheffieldUK

Personalised recommendations