Neighbourhood Ethnic Mix and the Formation of Mixed-Ethnic Unions in Britain

  • Zhiqiang Feng
  • Paul Boyle
  • Maarten van Ham
  • Gillian Raab
Chapter
Part of the Understanding Population Trends and Processes book series (UPTA, volume 3)

Abstract

Building on a long history of research on residential segregation, this chapter explores how mixed-ethnic couples contribute to changing ethnic geographies. The study uses data from the Longitudinal Study (LS) for England and Wales and is the first UK study to examine the influence of geographical context on the formation of mixed-ethnic unions. By using longitudinal data, the authors establish whether living in a mixed-ethnic neighbourhood makes it more likely for people to end up in mixed-ethnic unions.

Keywords

Ethnic Minority Ethnic Minority Group Residential Segregation South Asian Woman White Person 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research is funded by the ESRC under the Understanding Population Trends and Processes (UPTAP) programme (Award Ref: RES-1563-25-0045). The permission of the Office for National Statistics to use the Longitudinal Study is gratefully acknowledged, as is the help provided by Julian Buxton of the Centre for Longitudinal Study Information & User Support (CeLSIUS). CeLSIUS is supported by the ESRC Census of Population Programme (Award Ref: RES-348-25-0004). The data from ONS which is Crown copyright and reproduced with the permission of the controller of HMSO and Queen’s Printer for Scotland. This work uses research datasets which may not exactly reproduce National Statistics aggregates. The authors alone are responsible for the interpretation of the data.

References

  1. Ballard, R. (1997) Negotiating race and ethnicity: Exploring the implications of the 1991 Census, Patterns of Prejudice, 30: 3–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berrington, A. (1996) Marriage patterns and inter-ethnic unions in Coleman, D. and Salt, J. (eds.), Ethnicity in the 1991 Census: Demographic Characteristics of the Ethnic Minority Populations, HMSO, London, pp. 178–212.Google Scholar
  3. Blau, P.M. (1977) Inequality and Heterogeneity, The Free Press, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  4. Blau, P.M., Blum, T.C. and Schwartz, J.E. (1982) Heterogeneity and intermarriage, American Sociological Review, 47: 45–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bossard, J.H. (1932) Residential propinquity as a factor in marriage selection, American Journal of Sociology, 38: 219–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bozon, M. and Heran, F. (1989) Finding a spouse: A survey of how French couples meet, Population, 44: 91–121.Google Scholar
  7. Bradford, P. (2006, May) Who Are the Mixed-Ethnic Group? Office for National Statistics, London.Google Scholar
  8. Burgess, S., Wilson, D. and Lupton, R. (2005) Parallel lives? Ethnic segregation in the playground and the neighbourhood, Urban Studies, 42: 1027–1056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Coleman, D. (1985) Ethnic intermarriage in Great Britain, Population Trends, 40: 4–10.Google Scholar
  10. Coleman, D. (2004) Partner choice and the growth of ethnic minority populations, Bevolking en Gezin, 33: 7–34.Google Scholar
  11. Commission for Racial Equality (CRE) UK (2006) Integration, Multiculturalism and the CRE. http://www.cre.gov.uk/diversity/integration/index.html
  12. Cready, C.M. and Saenz, R. (1997) The nonmetro/metro context of racial/ethnic outmarriage: Some differences between African Americans and Mexican Americans, Rural Sociology, 62: 335–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Data Management and Analysis Group Update (2005) Inter-Ethnic Unions, DMAG, London.Google Scholar
  14. Delaney, D. (2002) The space that race makes, The Professional Geographer, 54: 6–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ellis, M., Wright, R. and Parks, V. (2006) The immigrant household and spatial assimilation: Partnership, nativity, and neighbourhood location, Urban Geography, 27: 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ellison, C.G. and Powers, D.A. (1994) The contact hypothesis and racial attitudes among black Americans, Social Science Quarterly, 75: 385–400.Google Scholar
  17. Emerson, M.O., Kimbro, R.T. and Yancey, G. (2002) Contact theory extended: The effects of prior racial contact on current social ties, Social Science Quarterly, 83: 745–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fu, X.N. (2006) Impact of socioeconomic status on inter-racial mate selection and divorce, Social Science Journal, 43(2): 239–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gordon, M.M. (1964) Assimilation in American Life, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  20. Holdsworth, C. and Dale, A. (1997) Issues in the analysis of ethnicity in the 1991 British census, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 20: 160–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Holloway, S.R., Ellis, M., Wright, R. and Hudson, M. (2005) Partnering ‘out’ and fitting in: Residential segregation and the neighbourhood contexts of mixed-race households, Population, Space and Place, 11: 299–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Houston, S., Wright, R., Ellis, M., Holloway, S. and Hudson, M. (2005) Places of possibilities: Where mixed-race partners meet? Progress in Human Geography, 29: 700–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hwang, S.S., Saenz, R. and Aguirre, B.E. (1994) Structural and individual determinants of outmarriage among Chinese, Filipino, and Japanese Americans in California, Sociological Inquiry, 64: 396–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hwang, S.S., Saenz, R. and Aguirre, B.E. (1997) Structural and assimilationist explanations of Asian American intermarriage, Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59: 758–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ihlanfeldt, K.R. and Scafidi, B.P. (2002) The Neighbourhood contact hypothesis: Evidence from the multicity study of urban inequality, Urban Studies, 39: 619–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Johnson, R., Poulsen, M. and Forrest, J. (2005) On the measurement and meaning of residential segregation: A response to Simpson, Urban Studies, 42: 1221–1227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Johnston, R., Poulsen, M. and Forrest, J. (2006) Ethnic residential segregation and assimilation in British towns and cities: A comparison of those claiming single and dual ethnic identities, Migration Letters, 3: 11–30.Google Scholar
  28. Kalmijn, M. (1993) Trends in black/white intermarriage, Social Forces, 72: 119–146.Google Scholar
  29. Kalmijn, M. (1998) Intermarriage and homogamy: Causes, patterns, trends, Annual Review of Sociology, 24: 395–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kalmijn, M. and Flap, H. (2001) Assortative meeting and mating: Unintended consequences of organized settings for partner choices, Social Forces, 79(4): 1289–1312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Liang, Z. and Ito, N. (1999) Intermarriage of Asian Americans in the New York City region: Contemporary patterns and future prospects, International Migration Review, 33(4): 876–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lievens, J. (1998) Interethnic marriages: Bringing in the context through multilevel modelling, European Journal of Population, 14: 117–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Model, S. and Fisher, G. (2002) Unions between Blacks and Whites: England and the US compared, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 25: 728–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Morgan, B. (1981) A contribution to the debate on homogamy, propinquity, and segregation, Journal of Marriage and the Family, 43: 909–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Muttarak, R. (2003) Who Intermarries in Britain? MSc thesis, Department of Sociology, University of Oxford, Oxford.Google Scholar
  36. Muttarak, R. (2004) Marital assimilation: Interethnic marriage in Britain, population and society: Issues, research, policy. Paper presented at the 12th biennial conference of Australian Population Association, 15–17 September 2004, Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
  37. Peach, C. (1980) Ethnic segregation and intermarriage, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 70: 371–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Peach, C. (1996) Does Britain have ghettos? Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 21: 216–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Platt, L., Simpson, L. and Akinwale, B. (2005) Stability and change in ethnic groups in England and Wales, Population Trends, 121: 35–45.Google Scholar
  40. Sabater, A. (2010) Ethnic residential segregation over time and age cohorts in England and Wales, 1991–2001 in Stillwell, J. and van Ham, M. (eds.), Ethnicity and Integration, Understanding Population Trends and Processes, Vol. 3, Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 47–62.Google Scholar
  41. Schoen, R. and Thomas, B. (1989) Intergroup marriage in Hawaii, 1969–1971 and 1979–1981, Sociological Perspectives, 32(3): 65–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schoen, R. and Wooldredge, J. (1989) Marriage choices in North Carolina and Virginia, 1969–71 and 1979–81, Journal of Marriage and Family, 51: 465–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sigelman, L., Bledsoe, T., Welch, S. and Combs, M.W. (1996) Making contact? Black-White social interaction in an urban setting, American Journal Sociology, 101: 1306–1332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Simpson, L. (2004) Statistics of racial segregation: Measures, evidence and policy, Urban Studies, 41: 661–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. White, M.J. and Sassler, S. (2000) Judging not only by color: Ethnicity, nativity, and neighbourhood attainment, Social Science Quarterly, 81: 997–1013.Google Scholar
  46. Wong, D. (1999) A geographical analysis of multiethnic households in the United States, International Journal of Population Geography, 5: 31–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wright, R., Houston, S., Ellis, M., Holloway, S. and Hudson, M. (2003) Crossing racial lines: Geographies of mixed-race partnering and multiraciality in the United States, Progress in Human Geography, 27: 457–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. van Ham, M. and Feijten, P.M. (2008) Who wants to leave the neighbourhood? The effect of being different from the neighbourhood population on wishes to move, Environment and Planning A, 40 (5): 1151–1170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zhiqiang Feng
    • 1
  • Paul Boyle
    • 1
  • Maarten van Ham
    • 2
  • Gillian Raab
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Geography and Geosciences/Longitudinal Studies Centre – Scotland (LSCS), University of St AndrewsFifeScotland, UK
  2. 2.School of Geography and Geosciences, Centre for Housing Research, University of St AndrewsFifeScotland, UK

Personalised recommendations