Advertisement

Emotion in Negotiation

  • Bilyana Martinovski
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Group Decision and Negotiation book series (AGDN, volume 4)

Abstract

Contemporary research on negotiation and group decision support systems (see the chapter by Lewis, this volume) pays a special attention on emotion as a factor in restructuring and reframing of problem representation and solution (Barry, Group Decis Negotiation 17:97–105, 2008; Druckman and Olekalns, Group Decis Negotiation 17:1–11, 2008). It involves multi-disciplinary approaches and reaches beyond sociology and behavioral research (see the chapter by Kilgour and Hipel, this volume). The present paper offers a bird-eye view of recent developments as well as novel theoretical approaches to emotion in negotiation. It explores the evolution of the concept of cognition and its effect on group decision-making research. Furthermore, it observes how e-negotiation, Virtual Agent modeling, and Theory of Mind involve emotion (see the chapter by Sicara and Dai, this volume). It studies linguistic manifestation (see the chapter by Koeszegi and Vetschera, this volume) and evolution of emotions in terms of emotional potential and power in joint communicative projects. Finally, it relates Levinas’ (1989, The Other in Proust. In: Levinas Reader (trans. S. Hand). Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp 160–165) ethics of otherness and Shakun’s concept of connectedness in negotiation (see the chapter by Shakun, this volume) to Buber’s (1995, Det Mellanmänskliga. Dualis Förlag AB, Falun (German original title Elemente des Swischenmenschlichen, Verlag Lambert Scneider, Heidelberg, 1954)) intuition about the limitations of sociology.

Keywords

Negotiation Strategy Defense Attorney Virtual Agent Functional Potential Plea Bargain 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

I am grateful to Melvin Shakun for inspiring connectedness and to Douglas Maynard and John Heritage for entrusting me with their useful data. This paper is dedicated to the bright memory of my mother, Ekaterina Terzieva and to Susana.

References

  1. Alderfer CP (1987) An intergroup perspective on group dynamics. In: Losch J (ed) Handbook of organisational behavior. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp 190–222Google Scholar
  2. Allred KG, Mallozzi JS, Matsui F, Raia CP (1997) The influence of anger and compassion on negotiation performance. Organ Behav and Hum Decis Process 70:175–187Google Scholar
  3. Allwood J (1995) An activity based approach to pragmatics. Gothenburg papers in Theoretical Linguistics 76. Department of Linguistics, University of Göteborg, GöteborgGoogle Scholar
  4. Allwood J (1996) Some comments on Wallace Chafe’s “How Consciousness Shapes Language”. Pragmat Cogn 4(1):55–65Google Scholar
  5. Allwood J (1997) Notes on dialogue and cooperation. In: Jokinen K, Sadek D, Traum D (eds) Collaboration, cooperation and conflict in dialogue systems. Proceedings of the IjCAI-97 workshop on collaboration, cooperation and conflict in dialogue systems, NagoyaGoogle Scholar
  6. Baron-Cohen S (2000) Theory of mind and autism: a fifteen year review. In: Baron-Cohen S, Tager-Flusberg H, Cohen D (eds) Understanding other minds: perspectives from developmental cognitive neuroscience, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  7. Barry B (2008) Negotiator affect: the state of the art (and the science). Group Decis Negotiation 17:97–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barry B, Fulmer IS, Van Kleef G (2004) I laughed, I cried, I settled: the role of emotion in negotiation. In: elfand MJ, Brett JM (eds) The handbook of negotiation and culture: theoretical advances and cross-cultural perspectives. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, pp 71–94Google Scholar
  9. Berkiwitz L (1989) The frustration-aggression hypothesis: an examination and reformulation. Psychol Bull 106:59–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Buber M (1995) Det Mellanmänskliga. Falun, Dualis Förlag AB (German original title Elemente des Swischenmenschlichen. Verlag Lambert Scneider, Heidelberg 1954)Google Scholar
  11. Carnevale P (2008) Positive affect and decision frame in negotiation. Group Decis Negotiation 17:51–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carver CS, Scheir MF (1990) Origins and functions of positive and negative effect: a control process view. Psychol Rev 97:19–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clark HH (1999) Using language. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  14. Clore GR, Ortony A, Diences B, Fujita F (1993) Where does anger dwell? In: Wyer RS Jr, Srull TK (eds) Perspectives on anger and emotion: advances in social cognition, vol 6. Hove and London, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 57–87Google Scholar
  15. Cornelius RR (2000) Theoretical Approaches to Emotion. Proceedings of ISCA Workshop on Speech and Emotion, Belfast, September 2000Google Scholar
  16. Daly J (1991) The effects of anger on negotiation over mergers and acquisitions. Negotiation J 7:31–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Damasio A (1994) Descartes’ error: emotion, reason, and the human brain. G.P. Putnam’s Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Davis MH (1994) Empathy: A social psychological approach. Brown and Benchmark, Madison, WIGoogle Scholar
  19. De Martino B, Kumaran D, Seymor B, Dolan RJ (2006) Frames, biases, and rational decision-making in the human brain. Science 313:684–687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Druckman D, Broome DJ (1991) Value difference and conflict resolution: familiarity or liking? J Confl Resolut 35(4): 571–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Druckman D, Olekalns M (2008) Emotions in negotiation. Group Decis Negotiation 17:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fuster JM (2003) Cortex and mind: unifying cognition. Oxford University Press, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  23. Gilbert MA (1995) Emotional argumentation, or, why do argumentation theorists argue with their mates. In: van Eemeren FH, Grootendorst R, Blair JA, and Willard CA (Eds) Analysis and Evaluation: Proceedings of the Third ISSA Conference on Argumentation, Vol II, Amsterdam 1994, Amsterdam: Sic Sat.Google Scholar
  24. Givón T (2005) Context as other minds: the pragmatics of sociality, cognition and communication. John Benjamins, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  25. Goodwin C, Heritage J (1990) Conversation analysis. Annu Rev Anthropol 19:283–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gordon R (1986) Folk psychology as simulation. Mind Lang 1:158–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gratch J, Marsella S (2001) Tears and fears: modeling emotions and emotional behaviors in synthetic agents. Paper presented at the 5th international conference on autonomous agents, Montreal, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  28. Gratch J, Marsella S (2004) A domain independent framework for modeling emotion. J Cogn Syst Res 5(4):269–306Google Scholar
  29. Gratch J, Marsella S (2005) Lessons from emotion psychology for the design of lifelike characters. Appl Artif Intell 19:215–233Google Scholar
  30. Griessmair M, Koeszegi ST (2009) Exploring the cognitive-emotional fugue in electronic negotiations. Group Decis Negotiation 18:3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gulliver PH (1979) Disputes and negotiations: a cross-cultural perspective. Academic Press, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  32. Hines MJ, Murphy SA, Weber M, Kersten G (2009) The role of emotion and language in dyadic e-negotiation. Group Decis Negotiation 18:3Google Scholar
  33. Hobbs J, Gordon A (2005) Encoding knowledge of commonsense psychology. In: 7th international symposium on logical formalizations of commonsense reasoning. May 22–24, Corfu, GreeceGoogle Scholar
  34. Hochschild AR (1983) The managed heart. Commercialization of human feeling. University of California Press, Berkeley, CAGoogle Scholar
  35. Hollingstead AB, Carnevale PJ (1990) Positive affect and decision frame in integrative bargaining: a reversal of the frame effect. Presented at the 50th annual meeting of the academy of management, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  36. Iacoboni M (2005) Understanding others: imitation, language, empathy. In: Hurley S, Chater N (eds) Perspectives on imitation: from cognitive neuroscience to social science. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  37. Kendon A (2004) Gesture: visible action as utterance. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  38. Kopelman S, Rosette AS (2008) Cultural variation in response to strategic display of emotions during negotiations. Special Issue on Emotions in Negotiation in Group Decision and Negotiations 17(1):65–77Google Scholar
  39. Kopelman S, Rosette AS, Thomson L (2006) The three faces of eve: strategical displays of positive, negative, and neutral emotions in negotiations. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 99(1):81–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kramer RM, Pommerenke P, Newton E (1993) The social context of negotiation: effects of social identity and interpersonal accountability on negotiator decision-making. J Conflict Resolut 37:633–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kraus S (2001) Strategic negotiation in multiagent environment. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  42. Kumar R (1997) The role of affect in negotiations: an integrative overview. J Appl Behav Sci 33(1):84–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lazarus RS (1991) Emotion and adaptation. Oxford University Press, NewYork, NYGoogle Scholar
  44. Levinas E (1989) The other in Proust. In: Hand S (Ed) Levinas Reader. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp 160–165Google Scholar
  45. Linell P, Markova I (1995) Coding elementary contributions to dialogue: individual acts versus dialogical interpretations. J Theor Soc Behav 26(4):353–373Google Scholar
  46. Martinovski B (2000) The role of repetitions and reformulations in court proceedings – a comparison of Sweden and Bulgaria. Gothenburg Monographs in Linguistics. Department of Linguistics, Göteborg University, GöteborgGoogle Scholar
  47. Martinovski B (2007) Shifting attention as re-contextualization in negotiation. In: Proceedings of GDN, MontrealGoogle Scholar
  48. Martinovski B, Mao W (2009) Emotion as an argumentation engine: Modeling the role of emotion in negotiation. J Group Decis Negot 18(3):235–259Google Scholar
  49. Martinovski B, Marsella S (2003) Dynamic reconstruction of selfhood: coping processes in discourse. In: Proceedings of joint international conference on cognitive science, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  50. Martinovski B, Traum D (2003) The error is the clue: breakdown in human-machine interaction. In: Proceedings of ISCA tutorial and research workshop international speech communication association, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  51. Martinovski B, Mao W, Gratch J, Marsella S (2005a) Mitigation theory: an integrated approach. In: Proceedings of Cognitive Science, Stresa, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  52. Martinovski B, Traum D, Marsella S (2005b) Rejection of empathy and its linguistic manifestations. In: Proceedings of conference on formal and informal negotiation, FINEXIN, Ottawa, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  53. McCarty LT (1997) Some arguments about legal arguments. In: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on artificial intelligence and law, Melbourne, Australia, June 30–July 03, 1997Google Scholar
  54. Mizukami E, Morimoto I, Suzuki K, Otsuka H, Kashioka H, Satoshi Nakamura S (2009) Two types of disagreement in group decisions of Japanese undergraduates. Group Decis Negotiation 18:3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Myers GE (2001) William James: his life and thought (1986). Yale University Press, New Haven, CTGoogle Scholar
  56. Nisbett RE, Ross L (1980) Human inference-strategies and shortcomings of human judgement. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJGoogle Scholar
  57. Obeidi A, Kilgour DM, Hipel KW (2009) Perceptual graph model systems. Group Decis Negotiation 18:3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Ortony A, Clore GL, Collins A (1988) The cognitive structure of emotions. Cambridge University Press, New York, NYCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Parkinson B (1996) Emotions are social. Br J Clin Psychol 87:663–683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Parrott WG (1994) Beyond hedonism: motives for inhibiting good moods and for maintaining bad moods. In: Wegner DM, Pennebaker JW (eds) Handbook of Mental Control., Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp 278–305Google Scholar
  61. Parsons S, Sierra C, Jennings NR (1998) Agents that reason and negotiate by arguing. J Logic Comput 8(3):261–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Payne JW, Bettman JR, Johnson EJ (1992) Behavioral decision research: a constructive processing perspective. Annu Rev Psychol 43:87–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Pelachaud C, Poggi I (2001) (eds) Multimodal communication and context in embodied agents. In: Proceedings of the workshop W7 at the 5th international conference on autonomous agents, Montreal, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  64. Poyatos F (2002) Nonverbal communication across disciplines. John Benjamins Publishing Co, Philadelphia, PAGoogle Scholar
  65. Prakken H (2005) AI & Law, logic and argument schemes. Argumentation 19:303–320 (special issue on The Toulmin model today)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Prakken H, Sartor G (2002) The role of logic in computational models of legal argument. In: Kakas A, Sadri F (eds) Computational logic: logic programming and beyond. Essays in honor of Robert A. Kowalski, Part II.. Springer, Berlin, pp 342–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Salovey P, Hsee CK, Mayer JD (1994) Emotional intelligence and the self regulation of affect. In: Wegner DM, Pennebaker JW (eds) Handbook of mental control. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp 258–277Google Scholar
  68. Schaller RM, Cialdini RB (1988) The economics of empathetic helping: support for a mood management motive. J Exp Psychol 24:163–181Google Scholar
  69. Scherer KR (1993) Neuroscience projections to current debates in emotion psychology. Cogn Emot 7:1–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Schwarz N (1990) Feelings as information: information and motivational functions of affective states. In: Higgins ET, Sorrentino RM (eds) Handbook of motivation and cognition: foundations of social behvaior vol 2. Guilford, New York, NY, pp 527–561Google Scholar
  71. Shakun M (2009) Connectedness problem solving and negotiation. Group Decis Negotiation 18(2):89–117Google Scholar
  72. Shakun MF (1988) Evolutionary systems design: policy making under complexity and group decision support systems. Holden-Day, Oakland, CAGoogle Scholar
  73. Shakun MF (1991) Airline buyout: evolutionary systems design and problem restructuring in group decision and negotiation. Manage Sci 37(10):1291–1303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Shiota MN, Keltner D, Hertenstein MJ (2004) Positive emotion and the regulation of interpersonal relationships. In: Philippot P, Feldman RS (eds) The regulation of emotion. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJGoogle Scholar
  75. Sierra C, Jennings NR, Noriega P, Parsons S (1997) A framework for argumentation-based negotiation. Intell Agents IV:177–192Google Scholar
  76. Stephan WG, Finlay KA (2002) The role of empathy in improving intergroup relations. J Soc Issues 55(4):729–743Google Scholar
  77. Stich S, Nichols S (1992) Folk psychology: simulation or tacit theory? Mind Lang 7:35–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Taylor SE, Crocker J (1981) Schematic basis of social information processing. In: Higgins ET, Herman CP, Zanna MP (eds) Social cognition: the Ontario symposium, vol 2. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 89–134Google Scholar
  79. Thagard P (2005) Mind: Introduction to cognitive science. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  80. Traum D (1994) A computational theory of grounding in natural language conversation. PhD thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  81. Traum D, Rickel J, Gratch J, Stacy M (2003) Negotiation over tasks in hybrid human-agent teams for simulation-based training. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international joint conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems. Melbourne, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  82. Tversky A, Kahneman D (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185:1124–1131Google Scholar
  83. Tversky A, Kahneman D (1981) The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211:453–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. van Eemeren FH, Grootendorst R (2004) A systematic theory of argumentation: the pragma-dialected approach. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  85. Vogel M (2008) Coercian to compromize. Oxford University Press, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  86. Von Uexkull J, Kriszat G (1934) Streifzuge durch die Umwelten Von Tieren und Menschen. Ein Bilderbuch unsichtbarer Welten. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Walton DN (1989) Informal logic: a handbook for critical argumentation. Cambridge University Press, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  88. Walton DN (1992) The place of emotion in argument. the Pennsylvania State U.P., University Park, PAGoogle Scholar
  89. Walton DN (1996) Argumentation schemes for presumptive reasoning. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJGoogle Scholar
  90. Wouters C (1989) The sociology of emotions in flight attendants: Hochschild’s managed heart. Theory Cult Soc 6:5–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Yifeng NC, Tjosvold D, Peinguan W (2008) Effects of warm-heartedness and reward distribution on negotiation. Special Issue on Emotions in Negotiation in Group Decision and Negotiations 17(1):65–77Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Business and Informatics, Borås University CollegeBoråsSweden

Personalised recommendations