Cross-Fertilisation of Science and Technology in the Time of Archimēdēs

  • Theodossios P. Tassios
Conference paper
Part of the History of Mechanism and Machine Science book series (HMMS, volume 11)


The mutually positive interaction between Science and Technology is first reminded, and the early traces of such a crossfertilisation are sought in Ancient Greece. Subsequently, this phenomenon is examined during the Hellenistic period. Several technical achievements are found to be inspired by scientific knowledge, whereas Technology did offer to Science some practical ideas and, above all, lots of measuring devices. Within this Alexandrian spirit, Archimēdēs was educated and has produced his mathematical and engineering works. Some of his inventions, probably inspired by his own mathematical findings, are mentioned. A more detailed analysis is presented on the scientific bases of the archimēdean planetarium, admired by Cicero. Further on, the innovative views of Archimēdēs are presented on the hybrid demonstration of some geometrical theorems, via both mechanical and theoretical means. Besides, the strange view of Plutarch is critically examined, according to which Archimēdēs considered as “unworthy and vile” any activity related to machines. In conclusion, this assertion is found to be completely unsupported and arbitrary. Finally, the scientific rationality of the design of machines during the Italian Renaissance is mentioned as a confirmation of the validity of the crossfertilisation process.


Worm Gear Late Antiquity Technical Achievement Hellenistic Period Hybrid Demonstration 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. M.E. Bottechia Dehό: “Problemi meccanici”, Rubbetino, Univ. di Calabria, 2000.Google Scholar
  2. M. Ceccarelli: “Renaissance of Machines in Italy…” Int. J. Mechanisms and Machines Theory, 2008. (on line).Google Scholar
  3. S. Cuomo: “Pappus of Alexandria and the Mathematics of Late Antiquity”, (ch. 3).Google Scholar
  4. G. Lloyd: “Greek Science after Aristotle”, 1973.Google Scholar
  5. R. Netz, W. Noel: “The Archimedes Codex”, Weindefels and Nicolson, 2007.N.C. Horst Novacki: “Archimedes and Ship Stability”, in Int. Conf. on Maritime research and Technology, Crete, Oct. 2001.Google Scholar
  6. J.P. Oleson (Ed): “The Oxford Handbook of Engineering and Technology in classical world”, Oxford Univ. Press, 2008.22 “Renaissance of Machines in Italy” in Int. Journal Mechanism and Machine Theory, on line DOI: 10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2008.01.001Google Scholar
  7. D.L. Simms: “Archimedes Nailing Plutarch’s lie”, in Proc. Cultural Crossfertilisation of Southern Italy and Western Greece through history, Patras, Sept. 2007.Google Scholar
  8. H. von Staden: “Body and Machine: Interactions between Medicine, Mechanics and Philosophy, in early Alexandria”, in “Alexandria and Alexandrianism”, J. Paul Getty Museum, 1996.Google Scholar
  9. E. Stamatis: “ Archimedes”, greek edition, Tech. Chamber of Greece, Athens, 1970.Google Scholar
  10. T.P. Tassios: “Prerequisities for the Antikythera Mechanism to be produced in the 2nd cent. BCE”, 24th Int. Congress of the History of Science and Technology, Budapest, 2009.Google Scholar
  11. H.C. Wilson: “Machines in Greek and Roman Technology”, in Oleson J.P. op. cit.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Netherlands 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Theodossios P. Tassios
    • 1
  1. 1.Nat. Tech. University of AthensPendeliGreece

Personalised recommendations