Abstract
We assessed the importance for biodiversity of man-made farm ponds in an agricultural landscape in SW France lacking natural wetlands. The ponds were originally created to provide a variety of societal services (irrigation, visual amenity, water for cattle, etc.). We also assessed the environmental factors influencing invertebrate assemblages in these ponds. Only 18 invertebrate taxa out of 114 taxa occurring in the study area were common to ponds and rivers indicating that the contribution of farm ponds to freshwater biodiversity was potentially high. A Self-Organizing Map (SOM, neural network) was used to classify 36 farm ponds in terms of the 52 invertebrate families and genera they supported, and to specify the influence of environmental variables related to land-use and to pond characteristics on the assemblage patterns. The SOM trained with taxa occurrences showed five clusters of ponds, most taxa occurring only in 1–2 clusters of ponds. Abandoned ponds tended to support higher numbers of taxa, probably because they were allowed to undergo a natural succession. Nevertheless, abandoned ponds were also amongst the largest, so that it remained difficult to separate the effects of pond size and abandonment, although both factors were likely to interact to favour higher taxon richness. The invertebrate communities in the ponds appeared to be influenced mainly by widely acting environmental factors (e.g. area, regionalization of assemblages) with little evidence that pond use (e.g. cattle watering, amenity) generally influenced assemblage composition. Our results support the idea that agricultural landscapes containing man-made ponds make a significant contribution to freshwater biodiversity indicating that protection of farm ponds from threats such as in-filling and pollution can make a positive contribution to the maintenance of aquatic biodiversity. This added value for biodiversity should be considered when calculating the economic costs and benefits of constructing water bodies for human activities.
Guest editors: R. Céréghino, J. Biggs, B. Oertli & S. Declerck
The ecology of European ponds: defining the characteristics of a neglected freshwater habitat
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Angélibert, S., P. Marty, R. Céréghino & N. Giani, 2004. Seasonal variations in physico-chemical characteristics of ponds: implications for biodiversity conservation. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 14: 439–456.
Biggs, J., A. Corfield, D. Walker, M. Whitfield & P. Williams, 1994. New approaches to the management of ponds. British Wildlife 5: 273–287.
Briers, R. A. & J. Biggs, 2003. Indicator taxa for the conservation of pond invertebrate diversity. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 13: 323–330.
Briers, R. A. & J. Biggs, 2005. Spatial patterns in pond invertebrate communities: separating environmental and distance effects. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 15: 549–557.
Céréghino, R., J. L. Giraudel & A. Compin, 2001. Spatial analysis of stream invertebrates distribution in the Adour-Garonne drainage basin (France), using Kohonen self organising maps. Ecological Modelling 146: 167–180.
Céréghino, R., Y. S. Park, A. Compin & S. Lek, 2003. Predicting the species richness of aquatic insects in streams using a limited number of environmental variables. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 22: 442–456.
Chapman, L. J., J. Balirwa, F. W. B. Bugenyi, C. Chapman & T. L. Crisman, 2001. Wetlands of East-Africa : biodiversity, exploitation and policy perspectives. In Gopal, B., W. J. Junk & J. A. Davis (eds), Biodiversity in Wetlands: Assessment Function and Conservation, Vol. 2. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, The Netherlands, 101–131.
Chase, J. M. & W. A. Ryberg, 2004. Connectivity, scale-dependence, and the productivity-diversity relationship. Ecology Letters 7: 676–683.
Davies, B. R., J. Biggs, J. T. Lee & S. Thompson, 2004. Identifying optimum locations for new ponds. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 14: 5–24.
Drakare, S., J. J. Lennon & H. Hillebrand, 2006. The imprint of the geographical, evolutionary and ecological context on species-area relationships. Ecology Letters 9: 215–227.
Gaston, K. J., R. M. Smith, K. Thompson & P. H. Warren, 2005. Urban domestic gardens (II): experimental tests of methods for increasing biodiversity. Biodiversity and Conservation 14: 395–413.
Hansson, L. A., C. Bronmark, P. A. Nilsson & K. Abjornsson, 2005. Conflicting demands on wetland ecosystem services: nutrient retention, biodiversity or both? Freshwater Biology 50: 705–714.
Hazell, D., J. M. Hero, D. Lindenmayer & R. Cunningham, 2004. A comparison of constructed and natural habitat for frog conservation in an Australian agricultural landscape. Biological Conservation 119: 61–71.
Karaus, U., L. Adler & K. Tockner, 2005. Concave islands: habitat heterogeneity of parafluvial ponds in a gravel-bed river. Wetlands 25: 26–37.
Kiviluoto, K., 1996. Topology preservation in self-organizing maps. In IEEE Service Center (ed.), Proceedings of ICNN’96, IEEE International Conference On Neural Networks, Piscataway, 294–299.
Kohonen, T., 1982. Self-organized formation of topologically correct feature maps. Biological Cybernetics 43: 59–69.
Kohonen, T., 1995. Self-Organizing Maps, volume 30 of Springer Series in Information Sciences. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Meffe, G. K. & C. R. Carroll, 1997. Principles of Conservation Biology, 2nd edn. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, MA.
Nature Midi-Pyrénées, 2005. Inventaire et préservation du patrimoine des mares de l’Astarac. 114 pp. Download at http://www.premiumwanadoo.com/naturemp/.
Odling-Smee, L., 2005. Dollars and sense. Nature 437: 614–616.
Oertli, B., D. Auderset-Joye, E. Castella, R. Juge, D. Cambin & J. B. Lachavanne, 2002. Does size matter? The relationship between pond area and biodiversity. Biological Conservation 104: 59–70.
Oertli, B., J. Biggs, R. Céréghino, P. Grillas, P. Joly & J. B. Lachavanne, 2005a. Conservation and monitoring of pond biodiversity: introduction. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 15: 535–540.
Oertli, B., D. Auderset-Joye, E. Castella, R. Juge, A. Lehmann & J. B. Lachavanne, 2005b. PLOCH: a standardized method for sampling and assessing the biodiversity in ponds. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 15: 665–679.
Park, Y. S., R. Céréghino, A. Compin & S. Lek, 2003. Applications of artificial neural networks for patterning and predicting aquatic insect species richness in running waters. Ecological Modelling 160: 265–280.
Pyke, C. R., 2005. Assessing suitability for conservation action: Prioritizing interpond linkages for the California tiger salamander. Conservation Biology 19: 492–503.
Robson, B. J. & C. J. Clay, 2005. Local and regional macroinvertebrate diversity in the wetlands of a cleared agricultural landscape in south-western Victoria, Australia. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 15: 403–414.
Rosenberg, D. M. & V. H. Resh, 1993. Freshwater Biomonitoring and Benthic Macroinvertebrates. Chapman and Hall, London, UK.
Scheffer, M., G. J. van Geest, K. Zimmer, E. Jeppesen, M. Sondergaard, M. G. Butler, M. A. Hanson, S. Declerck & L. De Meester, 2006. Small habitat size and isolation can promote species richness: second-order effects on biodiversity in shallow lakes and ponds. Oikos 112: 227–231.
Ultsch, A., 1993. Self-organizing neural networks for visualization and classification. In Opitz, O., B. Lausen & R. Klar (eds), Information and Classification. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 307–313.
Vesanto, J., J. Himberg, E. Alhoniemi & J. Parhankangas, 1999. Self-organizing map in matlab: the som toolbox. In Proceedings of the Matlab DSP Conference 1999, Comsol Oy, Espoo, Finland, 35–40.
Williams, P., M. Whitfield, J. Biggs, S. Bray, G. Fox, P. Nicolet & D. Sear, 2004. Comparative biodiversity of rivers, streams, ditches and ponds in an agricultural landscape in Southern England. Biological Conservation 115: 329–341.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Céréghino, R., Ruggiero, A., Marty, P., Angélibert, S. (2007). Biodiversity and distribution patterns of freshwater invertebrates in farm ponds of a south-western French agricultural landscape. In: Oertli, B., Céréghino, R., Biggs, J., Declerck, S., Hull, A., Miracle, M.R. (eds) Pond Conservation in Europe. Developments in Hydrobiology 210, vol 210. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9088-1_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9088-1_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-9087-4
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-9088-1
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)