Advertisement

Satisfaction Levels with Specific Life Domains

  • Takashi Inoguchi
  • Seiji Fujii
Chapter
Part of the Quality of Life in Asia book series (QLAS, volume 1)

Abstract

We examine satisfaction levels with 16 specific life domains and group 29 Asian countries and societies according to the patterns of satisfaction levels with the 16 life domains. In assessing quality of life, people consider all the things that matter to them and judge the overall quality of their lives as a whole, while at the same time people choose particular aspects or domains of their lives and judge each of those domains separately. According to the percentage difference index, the pooled data reveals that “marriage” is the domain with the highest level of satisfaction in Asia, while “the social welfare system” is least satisfied with. We also rank 29 countries and societies for each 16 specific life domain. We also distinguish 16 life domains into three life spheres—materialist factor or QOL-sustaining factor, post-materialist factor or QOL-enriching factor, and public sphere factor or QOL-enabling factor—for each individual country to look for a pattern of satisfaction levels. Then we propose a unique grouping of 29 countries and societies based on the priorities and combinations of the three factors.

Keywords

Household Income Factor Loading Response Category Family Life Supra Note 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Inglehart, R. (1971). The silent revolution in Europe: Intergenerational change in post-industrial societies. The American Political Science Review, 65, 991–1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Inglehart, R. (2006). Commentary on “The silent revolution in Europe: Intergenerational change in post-industrial societies”. American Political Science Review, 100, 685 (Thematic issue on the evolution of political science, in recognition of the centennial of the review).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Inglehart, R., & Abramson, P. R. (1994). Economic security and value change. American Political Science Review, 88, 336–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Inoguchi, T., & Blondel, J. (2008). Citizens and the states: Attitudes in Western Europe and East and Southeast Asia. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Park, C. M. (2009). The quality of life in South Korea. Social Indicators Research, 92, 263–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Shin, D. C., & Inoguchi, T. (Eds.). (2009). The quality of life in Confucian Asia: From physical welfare to subjective well-being (Social indicators research series). Dordrecht: Springer [This book was originally published as a special volume in Social Indicators Research, 92(2), (2009)].Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Takashi Inoguchi
    • 1
  • Seiji Fujii
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Niigata PrefectureTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations