e-Democracy pp 345-358 | Cite as

e-Democracy: The Road Ahead

  • Simon French
  • David Ríos Insua
Part of the Advances in Group Decision and Negotiation book series (AGDN, volume 5)


This chapter provides an overview of potential topics of interest within the fields of e-democracy and e-participation from a group decision and negotiation perspective, setting up a potential research and practice agenda.


Public Participation Participatory Process Previous Chapter Influence Diagram Participation Process 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



The work of DRI was supported by grants from ESF, the Spanish Government and e-Democracia-CM. The work of SF was supported by grants from ESF and Research Councils UK. Some of this article draws upon notes written jointly by SF and Clare Bayley, and we are grateful to her for permission to use them.


  1. Bayley, C. and S. French. 2008. Designing a participatory process for stakeholder involvement in a societal decision. Group Decision and Negotiation, 17(3), 179–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bayley, C. and S. French. 2010. Public participation: comparing approaches. Journal of Risk Research (accepted for publication).Google Scholar
  3. Bennett, P. G. and K. C. Calman, Eds. 1999. Risk Communication and Public Health: Policy Science and Participation. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Briggs, R. O., G.-J. de Veerde and J. F. Nunamaker. 2003. Collaboration engineering with thinklets to pursue sustained success with GSS. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 31–64.Google Scholar
  5. Browning, G. 2002. Electronic Democracy: Using the Internet to Transform American Politics. Medford, Information Today.Google Scholar
  6. Fischhoff, B. 1995. Risk perception and communication unplugged: Twenty years of process. Risk Analysis, 15, 137–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gigerenzer, G. 2002. Reckoning with Risk: Learning to Live with Uncertainty. Harmondsworth, Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  8. Hofstede, G. 1994. Management scientists are human. Management Science, 40(1), 4–13.Google Scholar
  9. Macauley, L. and A. Alabdulkarim. 2005. Facilitation of e-Meetings: State-of-the-Art Review. Paper read at IEEE International conference on e-technology, e-commerce and e-service, at Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  10. Maule, A. J. 2004. Translating risk management knowledge: The lessons to be learned from research on the perception and communication of risk. Risk Management, 6(2), 15–27.Google Scholar
  11. Niederman, F., C. M. Beise and P. M. Beranek. 1996. Issues and concerns about computer-supported meetings: The facilitator’s perspective. MIS Quarterly, 20(1), 1–22.Google Scholar
  12. French, S. 2007. Web-enabled strategic GDSS, e-democracy and Arrow’s Theorem: A Bayesian perspective. Decision Support Systems, 43, 1476–1484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. French, S., J. Maule and K. N. Papamichail. 2009. Decision Behaviour, Analysis and Support. Cambridge, MA, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Phillips, L. D. 1984. A theory of requisite decision models. Acta Psychologica, 56, 29–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Raiffa, H., J. Richardson and D. Metcalfe. 2002. Negotiation Analysis: The Science and Art of Collaborative Decision Making. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Ríos Insua, D. 2008. Special issue: eDemocracy, Group Decision and Negotiation, 17(3), 175–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sebenius, J. K. 2006. Negotiation analysis: Between decisions and games. In W. Edwards, R. F. Miles and D. Von Winterfeldt (Eds.), Advances in Decision Analysis. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. pp. 469–488.Google Scholar
  18. Tufte, E. R. 1997. Visual Explanations. Connecticut, Graphics Press.Google Scholar
  19. UK Government. 2008. White paper: communities in control: real people, real power. Department of Communities and Local Government, UK Government. (visited 8/2/2010)
  20. Wright, G. and L. D. Phillips. 1980. Cultural variation in probabilistic thinking: Alternative ways of dealing with uncertainty. International Journal of Psychology, 15, 239–257.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Manchester Business SchoolManchesterUK
  2. 2.Royal Academy of SciencesMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations