e-Democracy: A Group Decision and Negotiation-Oriented Overview

  • David Ríos Insua
  • Simon French
Part of the Advances in Group Decision and Negotiation book series (AGDN, volume 5)


This chapter provides an overview of the fields of e-participation and e-democracy and set them up in the context of group decisions and negotiations. It provides also a broad overview for the rest of the book, introducing the forthcoming chapters.


Unify Modelling Language Decision Analysis Group Decision Public Participation Participatory Process 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



The work of DRI was supported by grants from ESF, the Spanish Government and e-Democracia-CM. The work of SF was supported by grants from ESF and Research Councils UK.


  1. Bacharach, M. 1975. Group decisions in the face of differences of opinion. Management Science, 22, 182–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bennett, P. G. and K. C. Calman, Eds. 1999. Risk Communication and Public Health: Policy Science and Participation. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Berry, D. C. 2004. Risk Communication and Health Psychology. Maidenhead, Open University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Browning, G. 2002. Electronic Democracy: Using the Internet to Transform American Politics. Medford, Information Today.Google Scholar
  5. Carstensen, P. and K. Schmidt. 1999. Computer supported collaborative work: new challenges to system design. In K. Itoh (ed.), Handbook of Human Factors. Tokyo, Asakura Publications. pp. 619–636.Google Scholar
  6. Chen, J. Q. and S. M. Lee. 2003. An exploratory cognitive DSS for strategic decision making. Decision Support Systems, 36, 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clemen, R. T. and T. Reilly. 2005. Making Hard Decisions. Pacific Grove, CA, Duxbury, Thomson Learning.Google Scholar
  8. Coakes, E., D. Willis and S. Clarke, Eds. 2002. Knowledge Management in the SocioTechnical World. Computer Supported Co-operative Work. London, Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
  9. French, S., Ed. 2003. Special issue: the challenges in extending the MCDA paradigm to e-democracy. Journal of Multi-criteria Decision Analysis, 12, 61–233.Google Scholar
  10. French, S., Ed. 2007. Special issue: interface issues in e-democracy. International Journal in Technology and Policy Management, 7, 105–208.Google Scholar
  11. French, S., J. Maule and K. N. Papamichail. 2009. Decision Behaviour, Analysis and Support. Cambridge, MA, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. French, S. and D. Ríos Insua. 2000. Statistical Decision Theory. London, Arnold.Google Scholar
  13. French, S., D. Ríos Insua and F. Ruggeri. 2007. e-Democracy and decision analysis. Decision Analysis, 4, 211–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Goodwin, P. and G. Wright. 2003. Decision Analysis for Management Judgement. Chichester, Wiley.Google Scholar
  15. Gregory, R. S., B. Fischhoff and T. McDaniels. 2005. Acceptable input: using decision analysis to guide public policy deliberations. Decision Analysis, 2, 4–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hodge, J. K. and R. E. Klima. 2005. The Mathematics of Voting and Elections: A Hands-On Approach. Rhode Island, American Mathematical Society.Google Scholar
  17. Holtzman, S. 1989. Intelligent Decision Systems. Reading, MA, Addison-Welsey.Google Scholar
  18. Humphreys, P. C. and W. McFadden. 1980. Experiences with MAUD: aiding decision structuring versus bootstrapping the decision maker. Acta Psychologica, 45, 51–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Keefer, D. L., C. W. Kirkwood and J. L. Corner. 2004. Perspective on decision analysis applications, 1990–2001 (with discussion). Decision Analysis, 1, 4–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Langford, I., C. Marris and T. O’Riordan. 1999. Public reactions to risk: social structures, images of science and the role of trust. In P. G. Bennett and K. C. Calman (Eds.), Risk Communication and Public Health: Policy, Science and Participation. Oxford, Oxford University Press. pp. 33–50.Google Scholar
  21. Leach, M., I. Scoones and B. Wynne, Eds. 2005. Science and Citizens. London, Zed Books.Google Scholar
  22. Nunamaker, J. F., L. M. Applegate and B. R. Konsynski. 1988. Computer-aided deliberation: model management and group decision support. Operations Research, 36, 826–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Papamichail, K. N. and I. Robertson. 2005. Integrating decision making and regulation in the management control process. Omega, 33, 319–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Phillips, L. D. 1984. A theory of requisite decision models. Acta Psychologica, 56, 29–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Raiffa, H., J. Richardson and D. Metcalfe. 2002. Negotiation Analysis: The Science and Art of Collaborative Decision Making. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Renn, O. 1999. A model for an analytic-deliberative process in risk management. Environmental Science and Technology, 33, 3049–3055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Renn, O., T. Webler and P. Wiedermann, Eds. 1995. Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation: Evaluating Models and Environmental Discourse. Dordrecht, Kluwer.Google Scholar
  28. Ríos Insua, D. 2008. Special issue: eDemocracy. Group Decision and Negotiation, 17(3), 175–265.Google Scholar
  29. Ríos Insua, D. and F. Ruggeri. 2000. Robust Bayesian Analysis. New York, NY, Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rowe, G. and L. J. Frewer. 2005. A typology of public engagement methods. Science Technology and Human Values, 30, 251–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rowe, G., T. Horlick-Jones, J. Walls and N. Pidgeon. 2005. Difficulties in evaluating public engagement initiatives: reflections on an evaluation of the UK GM Nation? public debate. Public Understanding or Science, 14, 331–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sheppard, S. R. J. and M. J. Meitner. 2005. Using multi-criteria analysis and visualization for sustainable forest management planning with stakeholder groups. Forest Ecology and Management, 207(1–2), 171–187.Google Scholar
  33. Stallings, W. 2005. Cryptography and Network Security. Saddle River, NJ, Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  34. Steffek, J. and C. Kissling. 2007. Civil Society Participation in European and Global Governance: A Cure for the Democratic Deficit? New York, NY, Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Winn, M. I. and L. R. Keller. 2001. A modelling methodology for multi-objective multi-stakeholder decisions: implications for research. Journal of Management Inquiry, 102, 166–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Royal Academy of SciencesMadridSpain
  2. 2.Manchester Business SchoolManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations