Protecting the Victims of the Privatization of War

  • Willem van Genugten
  • Marie-José van der Heijden
  • Nicola Jägers
Chapter
Part of the Studies in Global Justice book series (JUST, volume 8)

Abstract

Since the end of the Cold War, which brought about a shrinking of the size of national armies, one can observe an increased role of private military and security companies in conflict areas. States, most notably the United States of America and the United Kingdom, but increasingly also other states such as South Africa, are outsourcing war efforts, while in general progressively more tasks are being contracted out to Private Military and Security Companies (PMSCs) The major difference between traditional armies and PMSCs is the contract-base on which these companies work. The PMSCs provide a wide pallet of services ranging from consultancy to combat, and it amy be easier to categorize some of these activities as military than others such as logistic services, training and operational support.

Keywords

International Criminal Court Geneva Convention Universal Jurisdiction Private Contractor Private Military 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Eefje de Volder for her willingness to read and comment on an earlier draft. This article has benefited greatly from her lucid remarks. Naturally, any remaining mistakes are ours.

References

  1. Cottier, M. (2007). ‘Elements for Contracting and Regulating Private Security and Military Companies’, International Review of the Red Cross, 88.Google Scholar
  2. Dahl, M.C. (2008). ‘Soldiers of Fortune – Holding private Security Contractors Accountable: The Alien Tort Claims Act And Its Potential Application To Abtan v. Blackwater USA’, ExpressO, Available at: http://works.bepress.com/matthew_dahl/1
  3. Engström, V. (2002). Who is Responsible for Corporate Human Rights Violations?, Åbo Akademi University, Institute for Human Rights, p. 19.Google Scholar
  4. Garmon, T. (2003). ‘Domesticating International Corporate Responsibility: Holding Private Military Firms Accountable Under the Alien Tort Claims Act’, Tulane Journal of International and Comparative Law, 11.Google Scholar
  5. Hiemstra (2007). ‘De nieuwe vrije lansier’, Militair Rechtelijk Tijdschrift.Google Scholar
  6. International Council on Human Rights Policy (ICHRP) (2002). Beyond Voluntarism. Human rights and the developing international legal obligations of companies, ICHRP, Geneva.Google Scholar
  7. Jennifer, E.K., Schwartz, M., & Nakamura, K.H. (2008). ‘CRS Report for Congress, Private Security Contractors in Iraq: Background, Legal Status, and Other Issues, Order Code RL 32419’, Updated August 25, 2008, p. 5Google Scholar
  8. Kamminga, M.T. (2005). “Universal Civil Jurisdiction: Is it legal? Is it desirable?”, ASIL Proceedings, p. 125 for the argument of consistency of universal jurisdiction under international law.Google Scholar
  9. Klein, E. (2000). ‘The Duty to Protect and to Ensure Human Rights Under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights’, in: Klein, E. (ed.), The Duty to Protect and to Ensure Human Rights, (Colloquium Potsdam, 1–3 July 1999), Berlin, Berlin Verlag, pp. 296–297.Google Scholar
  10. MacDonald, A. (2007). ‘Dogs of War Redux? Private Military Contractors and the “New Mercenarism”’, Mílitair Rechtelijk Tijdschrift.Google Scholar
  11. Milliard, T.S. (2003). ‘Overcoming Post-Colonial Myopia. A Call to Recognize and Regulate PMCs’, Military Law Review, 176.Google Scholar
  12. Mongelard, E. (2006). ‘Corporate Civil Liability for Violations of International Humanitarian Law’, ICRC-review, 88.Google Scholar
  13. Ryngaert, C. (2007). ‘Universal Tort Jurisdiction over Gross Human Rights Violations’, in: Netherlands Yearbook of International Law, vol. 38, La Haya, T.M.C. Asser Press.Google Scholar
  14. Singer, P.W. (2001/2002). ‘Corporate Warriors: The Rise of the privatized Military Industry and its Ramifications for International Security’, International Security, 26.Google Scholar
  15. Stephens, B. (2002). ‘Translating Filartiga: A Comparative and International Law Analysis of Domestic Remedies for International Human Rights Violations’, Yale Journal of International Law, 27.Google Scholar
  16. Taljaard, R. (2006). ‘Implementing South Africa’s Regulation of Foreign Military Assistance Act’, in: Caparini, M. & Bryden, A. (eds.), Private Actors and Security Governance, Berlin, Lit Verlag.Google Scholar
  17. UK Green Paper (2002). Private Military Companies: Option for Regulation, London, The Stationary Office.Google Scholar
  18. Vail, J. (2006). The Private Law of War, 11 May, available at: http://www.jeffvail.net/privatelawofwar.pdf

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Willem van Genugten
    • 1
  • Marie-José van der Heijden
    • 1
  • Nicola Jägers
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Law, Tilburg UniversityTilburgThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations