Advertisement

Modus Vivendi and Religious Conflict

  • John Horton
Chapter
Part of the Studies in Global Justice book series (JUST, volume 7)

Abstract

This paper explains and advocates a political theory of modus vivendi, and specifically explores how it might work in the context of problems arising from religious conflicts. The account of modus vivendi that is defended is distinguished both from that of John Rawls and that of John Gray, and is conceived primarily as a matter of bargaining, negotiation and compromise. It is not merely to be understood as a simple reflection of the balance of political forces but a 'pragmatic' approach that mobilises whatever resources are available to effect a workable political settlement that is broadly acceptable to the contending parties. In the final part of the paper the merits of this conception are considered in the context of religious conflicts, with the Good Friday Agreement in Northern Ireland taken as one exemplar of a political theory of modus vivendi in action.

Keywords

Political Theory Political Theorist Political Force Comprehensive Doctrine Religious Believer 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

I am very grateful for comments, suggestions and advice in relation to an earlier version of this paper to the participants in the ESRC seminar held at Keele University in June 2008 in the series, ‘Recognition and the Dynamics of Social Conflict: Toleration, Recognition and Diversity’; and in particular for their written comments to Veit Badar, Cillian McBride and, especially, Monica Mookherjee. I am also grateful to two anonymous referees for the Springer Press. There is some overlap between this article and a series of other papers that I have written on various aspects of the political theory of modus vivendi. As a result, this article has also benefitted from discussions of those papers, and I am particularly grateful to, inter alia, Esther Abin, Sorin Baiasu, Richard Bellamy, Thomas Fossen, Peter Jones, Cecile Laborde, Glen Newey, Avia Pasternak, Enzo Rossi and Ryan Windeknecht.

References

  1. Cox, M., A. Guelke and F. Stephen (eds.). 2000. A Farewell to Arms? from ‘Long War’ to ‘Long Peace’ in Northern Ireland. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Dauenhauer, B. 2000. A Good Word for Modus Vivendi. In V. Davion and C. Wolf (eds.), The Idea of a Political Liberalism. New York, NY: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  3. Galston, W. 2010. ‘Realism in Political Theory’, European Journal of Political Theory, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  4. Geuss, Raymond. 2008. Philosophy and Real Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Gray, John. 2000. Two Faces of Liberalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  6. Hampshire, Stuart. 1999. Justice is Conflict. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
  7. Hershovitz, S. 2000. A Mere Modus Vivendi? In V. Davion and C. Wolf (eds.), The Idea of a Political Liberalism. New York, NY: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  8. Horton, John. 2005. A Qualified Defence of Oakeshott’s Politics of Scepticism. European Journal of Political Theory 4: 23–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Horton, John. 2007. John Gray and the Political Theory of Modus Vivendi. In J. Horton and G. Newey (eds.), The Political Theory of John Gray. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Horton, John. 2009. Political Leadership and Contemporary Political Theory. In J. Femia, A. Koroskenyi and G. Slomp (eds.), Political Leadership in Liberal Democratic Theory. Exeter: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar
  11. Levy, Jacob. 2007. Contextualism, Constitutionalism, and Modus Vivendi Approaches. In Antony Laden and David Owen (eds.), Multiculturalism and Political Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Mills, C. 2000. ‘Not a Mere Modus Vivendi’: The Bases of Allegiance to the Just State. In V. Davion and C. Wolf (eds.), The Idea of a Political Liberalism. New York, NY: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  13. Neal, Patrick. 1997. Liberalism and Its Discontents. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  14. Newey, Glen. 2001. After Politics: The Rejection of Politics in Contemporary Liberal Theory. Basingstoke: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  15. Oakeshott, Michael. 1962. Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  16. Rawls, John. 1993. Political Liberalism. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Rawls, John. 2001. Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Raz, Joseph. 1986. The Morality of Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Shklar, Judith. 1989. The Liberalism of Fear. In Nancy Rosenblum (ed.), Liberalism and the Moral Life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Williams, Bernard. 2005. In the Beginning Was the Deed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Politics, International Relations and Philosophy, Keele UniversityStaffordshireUK

Personalised recommendations