Advertisement

Hegel, Global Justice, and Mutual Recognition

  • Andrew Buchwalter
Chapter
Part of the Studies in Global Justice book series (JUST, volume 10)

Abstract

In recent years more and more attention has been afforded the role of recognition in Hegel’s practical philosophy. For the most part, however, such discussions have focused on Hegel’s account of individuals, their identities and their relationships. Less attention has been accorded the value of recognition theory as regards the identity and relations of groups, peoples, and nations. This chapter seeks to fill this lacuna, employing elements of Hegel’s theory of recognition and in particular his account of reciprocal recognition to elucidate themes in global justice. Attention is given to four specific topics: the place of national sovereignty in a transnational setting, cosmopolitanism, global distributive justice, and the idea of global community itself. Examining these themes from the perspective of recognition theory facilitates appreciation both of the distinctly Hegelian approach to these issues and the value of Hegelian thought for the general discourse on global justice.

Keywords

Global Community Global Justice Recognition Theory Political Sovereignty Reciprocal Recognition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Appiah, Kwame Anthony. 2000. Cosmopolitan patriots. Cosmopoliticus. Thinking and feeling beyond the nation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  2. Beck, Ulrich. 2000. What is globalization? (trans: Patrick Camiller). London: Polity.Google Scholar
  3. Beck, Ulrich. 2009. World at risk (trans: Ciaran Cronin). Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  4. Bernasconi, Robert. 1998. Hegel at the court of the Ashanti. In Hegel after Derrida, ed. S. Barnett. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Bernasconi, Robert. 2003. Hegel’s racism: A reply to McCarney. Radical Philosophy 119(May/June): 32–37.Google Scholar
  6. Bielefeldt, Heiner. 2008. Menschenrechte als interkulturelle Lerngeschichte. In Philosophie, wozu? ed. Hans Jörg Sandkühler. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  7. Buchwalter, Andrew. 2012. Dialectics, politics, and the contemporary values of Hegel practical philosophy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Buck-Morss, Susan. 2000. Hegel and Haiti. Critical Inquiry 26(Summer): 821–865.Google Scholar
  9. Caney, Simon. 2009. Cosmopolitanism and justice. In Contemporary debates in political philosophy, ed. Thomas Christano and John Christman, 387–407. London: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  10. Chakrabarty, Depesh. 2000. Provincializing Europe: Post colonial thought and historical difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Crocker, David A. 1999. Insiders and outsiders in international development. In Moral issues in global perspective, ed. Christine Koggel, 147–162. Peterborough: Broadview Press.Google Scholar
  12. Dryzek, John S. 2000. Transnational democracy: Beyond the cosmopolitan model. In Deliberative democracy and beyond, 115139. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. DuBois, W.E.B. 1997. The souls of black folk. Boston/New York: Bedford Books.Google Scholar
  14. Fanon, Frantz. 1967. Black skin, white masks (trans: Charles Lam Markmann). New York: Grove Press.Google Scholar
  15. Giddens, Anthony. 1994. Living in a post-traditional society. In Reflexive modernization: Politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order, ed. Ulrich Beck et al. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Habermas, Jürgen. 2001. Why Europe needs a constitution. New Left Review 11(Sept–Oct).Google Scholar
  17. Habermas, Jürgen. 2006. Does the constitutionalization of international law still have a chance? In The divided west (trans: Ciaran Cronin). Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  18. Habermas, Jürgen. 2010. The concept of human dignity and the realistic utopia of human rights. Metaphilosophy 41(4, July).Google Scholar
  19. Hardin, Garrett. 1974. Lifeboat ethics: The case against helping the poor. Psychology Today (September).Google Scholar
  20. Hegel, G.W.F. 1964. Political writings, ed. Zbignew Pelczynski. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Hegel, G.W.F. 1971. The philosophy of mind, Part III of the Encyclopedia of philosophical sciences (trans: William Wallace and A.V. Miller). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Hegel, G.W.F. 1975. Lectures on the philosophy of world history. Introduction: Reason in history (trans: Nisbet, H.B.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Hegel, G.W.F. 1983. Vorlesungen über Naturrecht und Staatswissenschaft. Heidelberg 1817/18 (transcribed by Wannenmann, P. and ed. Becker, C. et al.) Hamburg: Felix Meiner.Google Scholar
  24. Hegel, G.W.F. 1987. Jenaer Systementwürfe III, ed. Rolf-Peter Horstmann. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
  25. Hegel, G.W.F. 1991. Elements of the philosophy of right (ed. Allen Wood and trans. H.B. Nisbet). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Hoffheimer, Michael H. 2001. Hegel, race, genocide. The Southern Journal of Philosophy 39: 35–62.Google Scholar
  27. Honneth, Axel. 2010a. Anerkennung zwischen Staaten. Zum moralischen Untergrund zwischenstaatlicher Beziehugnen. In Das Ich im Wir. Studien zur Anerkennungstheorie Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  28. Honneth, Axel. 2010b. The pathologies of individual freedom: Hegel’s social theory (trans: Ladislaus Löb). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Knowles, Dudley. 2002. The Routledge philosophy guidebook to Hegel and the philosophy of right. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Li, Xiaorung. 1998. A question of priorities: Human rights, development, and ‘Asian Values.’ In Report from the institute for public policy 18(1–2, Winter–Spring): 7–12.Google Scholar
  31. MacCormick, Neil. 1999. Questioning sovereignty: Law, state and nation in the European commonwealth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. McCarney, Joseph. 2000. Hegel on history. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. McCarney, Joseph. 2003. Hegel’s racism? A response to Bernasconi. Radical Philosophy 119(May–June): 32–35.Google Scholar
  34. Nagel, Thomas. 2005. The problem of global justice. Philosophy and Public Affairs 33(2): 113–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nussbaum, Martha. 2005. Beyond the social contract: Capabilities and global justice. In The political philosophy of cosmopolitanism, ed. Brock Gillian and Brighouse Harry, 196–218. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Parekh, Bhikhu. 2005. Principles of a global ethic. In Global ethics and civil society, ed. J. Eade and D. O’Bryne, 15–23. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  37. Pippin, Robert. 2008. Hegel’s practical philosophy: Rational agency as ethical life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pogge, Thomas. 2008. World poverty and human rights, vol. 2. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  39. Rawls, John. 1999. The law of peoples. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Rée, Jonathan. 1998. Cosmopolitanism and the experience of nationality. In Cosmopoliticus: Thinking and feeling beyond the nation, ed. Pheng Cheah and Bruce Robbins. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  41. Robertson, Roland. 1992. Globalization: Social theory and global culture. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  42. Sassen, Saskia. 2008. Neither global nor national: Novel assemblages of territory, authority, and rights. Ethics & Global Politics 1(1–2): 61–79.Google Scholar
  43. Siep, Ludwig. 1995. Das Recht als Ziel der Geschichte: Überlegungen im Anschluß an Kant und Hegel. In Das Recht der Vernunft: Kant und Hegel über Denken, Erkennen und Handeln, ed. Christel Fricke et al., 355–379. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstaat: Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar
  44. Singer, Peter. 1972. Famine, affluence, and morality. Philosophy and Public Affairs 1(1, Spring): 229–243.Google Scholar
  45. Taylor, Charles. 1999. Conditions of an unforced consensus on human rights. In The politics of human rights, ed. Obrad Savić and Beogradski Krug, 101–119. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  46. Vieweg, Klaus. 2000. Das Prinzip Anerkennung in Hegels universalistischer Theorie des äusseren Staatsrechts. In Metaphysik der praktischen Welt. Perspektiven im Anschluß an Hegel und Heidegger, ed. Christoph Jamme and Andreas Grossmann. Amsterdam/Atlanta: Rodopi.Google Scholar
  47. Williams, Robert R. 1997. Hegel’s ethics of recognition. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  48. Zamir, Shamoon. 1995. Dark voices: W.E.B. Du Bois and American thought, 1888–1903. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of North FloridaJacksonvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations