Welfare States, Family Policies, and Fertility in Europe

Chapter

Abstract

This contribution discusses the potentials of welfare-state approaches for fertility research in Europe. Demographers mostly concentrate on family policies and their effects on fertility. They usually find no fertility-elevating effects of individual family policies or only small effects on the aggregate level. This has led them to turn their attention instead to welfare states and to national configurations of social and family policies. In this contribution, I argue that welfare-state and single-policy approaches complement each other and that both are needed for a better understanding of fertility developments. I outline the main concepts of the welfare state and their usefulness for fertility research, underlining two aspects in particular: First, the relative persistence of the orientation of a welfare state provides a framework to assess the effects of policies and policy changes across countries and over time. Second, different welfare states are associated with different labor-market and educational systems, which allows us to view fertility behavior within a framework of interrelated complementary institutions.

Keywords

Labor Market Welfare State Parental Leave Family Policy Welfare Regime 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

I thank Tomáš Sobotka and Tomas Frejka for Fig. 3.1 and Tomáš Sobotka for the additional data for Fig. 3.1, as well as Jan Hoem and Gunnar Andersson for editorial advice. I acknowledge financial support by the Linnaeus Center on Social Policy and Family Dynamics in Europe (SPaDE), grant 349-2007-8701 of the Swedish Research Council.

References

  1. Anttonen, A., & Sipilä, J. (1996). European social care services: Is it possible to identify models? Journal of European Social Policy, 6(2), 87–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arts, W., & Gelissen, J. (2002). Three worlds of welfare capitalism or more? A state-of-the-art report. Journal of European Social Policy, 12(2), 137–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benner, M., & Vad, T.B. (2000). Sweden and Denmark: Defending the welfare state. In Scharpf, F.W. and Schmidt, V.A. (Eds.). Welfare and work in the open economy. Volume II: Diverse responses to common challenges in twelve countries (pp. 399–466). Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  4. Bledsoe, C., Banja, R., & Hill, A. G. (1998). Reproductive mishaps and Western contraception: An African challenge to fertility theory. Population and Development Review, 24(1), 15–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boeri, T., Börsch-Supan, A., & Tabellini, G. (2001). Would you like to shrink the welfare state. A survey of European citizens. Economic Policy, 16(32), 9–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bonoli, G. (2005). The politics of the new social policies: Providing coverage against new social risks in mature welfare states. Policy and Politics, 33(3), 431–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bourdieu, P. (1996). On the family as a realized category. Theory, Culture and Society, 13(3), 19–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Castles, F. G. (2003). The world turned upside down: Below replacement fertility, changing preferences and family-friendly public policy in 21 OECD countries. Journal of European Social Policy, 13(3), 209–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Castles, F. G., & Obinger, H. (2008). Worlds, families, regimes: Country clusters in European and OECD area public policy. West European Politics, 31(1–2), 321–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cerami, A., & Vanhuysse, P. (Eds.). (2009). Post-communist welfare pathways. Theorizing social policy transformations in central and Eastern Europe. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
  11. Culpepper, P. D. (2007). Small states and skill specificity. Austria, Switzerland, and interemployer cleavages in coordinated capitalism. Comparative Political Studies, 40, 611–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Esping-Andersen, G. (1999). Social foundations of postindustrial economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Esping-Andersen, G., Gallie, D., Hemerijk, A., & Myers, J. (2002). Why we need a new welfare state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Estévez-Abe, M. (2005). Gender bias in skills and social policies: The varieties of capitalism perspective on sex segregation. Social Politics, 12(2), 180–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Estévez-Abe, M. (2009). Gender, inequality and capitalism: The “varieties of capitalism” and women. Social Politics, 16(2), 182–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Estévez-Abe, M., Iversen, T., & Soskice, D. (2001). Social protection and the formation of skills. A reinterpretation of welfare state. In P. Hall & Soskice, D. (Eds.). Varieties of capitalism. The institutional foundations of comparative advantage (pp. 145–183). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Ferrera, M. (1996). The ‘southern model’ of welfare in social Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 6(1), 17–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Flora, P., & Heidenheimer, A. (1982). The historical core and changing boundaries of the welfare state. In P. Flora & A. Heidenheimer (Eds.), The development of welfare states in Europe and America (pp. 17–34). New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  20. Fraser, N., & Gordon, L. (1994). A genealogy of dependence: Tracing a keyword of the U.S. welfare state. Signs, 9(2), 309–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Frejka, T., & Ross, J. (2001). Paths to subreplacement fertility: The empirical evidence. In R.A. Bulatao & J.B. Casterline (Eds.), The global fertility transition. Supplement to Population and Development Review (Vol. 27) pp. 213–254.Google Scholar
  22. Frejka, T. & Sobotka, T. (2008). Overview chapter 1: Fertility in Europe: Diverse, delayed and below replacement. In T. Frejka., T. Sobotka., J.M. Hoem & L. Toulemon (Eds.), Childbearing trends and policies in Europe. Demographic Research (Vol. 19(3), pp. 15–36).Google Scholar
  23. Frejka, T., Sobotka, T., Hoem, J.M,. & Toulemon, L (Eds.). (2008). Childbearing trends and policies in Europe. Volume 1–3. Demographic Research 19.Google Scholar
  24. Gauthier, A. H. (2007). The impact of family policies on fertility in industrialized countries: A review of the literature. Population and Policy Review, 26, 323–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Goldscheider, F. K. (2000). Men, children and the future of the family in the third millennium. Futures, 32, 525–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Goldstein, J., Sobotka, T., & Jasilioniene, A. (2009). The end of “lowest-low” fertility? Population and Development Review, 35(4), 663–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gornick, J. C., Meyers, M. K., & Ross, K. E. (1997). Supporting the employment of mothers: Policy variation across fourteen welfare states. Journal of European Social Policy, 7(1), 45–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hall, P. A. (1993). Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: The case of economic policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics, 25(3), 275–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hall, P.A. & Soskice, D. (2001). An introduction to varieties of capitalism. In P.A. Hall & D. Soskice. (eds.), Varieties of capitalism. The institutional foundations of comparative advantage (pp. 1–70). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Hoem, J.M. (2008). The impact of public policies on European fertility. In: T. Frejka., T. Sobotka., J.M. Hoem.,& L. Toulemon. (Eds.), Childbearing trends and policies in Europe. Demographic Research (Vol. 19(10), pp. 249–259).Google Scholar
  31. Hoem, J. M., & Mureşan, C. (2011). An extension of the conventional TFR. European Journal of Population, 27(4), 389–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hoem, J. M., Neyer, G., & Andersson, G. (2006). Education and childlessness. The relationship between educational field, educational level, and childlessness among Swedish women born in 1955–59. Demographic Research, 14(15), 331–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kalwij, A. (2010). The impact of family policy expenditure on fertility in Western Europe. Demography, 47(2), 503–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Korpi, W. (2000). Faces of inequality: Gender, class, and patterns of inequalities in different types of welfare states. Social Politics, 7(2), 127–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Knijn, T., & Kremer, M. (1997). Gender and the caring dimension of welfare states: Towards inclusive citizenship. Social Politics, 4(3), 328–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Leitner, S. (2003). Varieties of familialism. The caring function of the family in comparative perspective. European Societies, 5(4), 353–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lewis, J. (1992). Gender and the development of welfare regimes. Journal of European Social Policy, 2(3), 159–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mahoney, J., & Thelen, K. (2010). A theory of gradual institutional change. In J. Mahoney & K. Thelen (Eds.), Explaining institutional change: Ambiguity, agency, and power (pp. 1–37). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Mandel, H., & Semyonov, M. (2006). A welfare state paradox: State interventions and women’s employment opportunities in 22 countries. American Journal of Sociology, 111(6), 1910–1949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mandel, H., & Shalev, M. (2009). Gender, class, and varieties of capitalism. Social Politics, 16(2), 161–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mayer, K. U., & Schoepflin, U. (1989). The state and the life course. Annual Review of Sociology, 15, 187–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mayer, K. U. (2009). New directions in life course research. Annual Review of Sociology, 35, 413–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. McCall, L., & Orloff, A. S. (2005). Introduction to special issue of Social Politics: “Gender, class, and capitalism”. Social Politics, 12(2), 159–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. McDonald, P. (2000). Gender equity theory in fertility transition. Population and Development Review, 26(3), 427–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. McDonald, P. (2006). Low fertility and the state: The efficacy of policy. Population and Development Review, 32(3), 485–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. McNicoll, G. (1994). Institutional analysis of fertility. Population Council Research Division Working Paper 72.Google Scholar
  47. McNicoll, G. (2001). Government and fertility in transitional and post-transitional societies. In: R.A. Bulatao & J.B. Casterline. (Eds.), The global fertility transition. Supplement to Population and Development Review 27, Supplement, pp. 129–159.Google Scholar
  48. McNicoll, G. (2009). Legacy, policy, and circumstance in fertility transition. Population and Development Review, 35(4), 777–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Neyer, G. (2003). Family policies and low fertility in Western Europe. Supplement to Volume 1, Journal of Population and Social Security, 46–93.Google Scholar
  50. Neyer, G. (2005). Family policies in Western Europe. Fertility policies at the intersection of gender, employment and care policies. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft, 91–102.Google Scholar
  51. Neyer, G. (2011). Should governments in Europe be more aggressive in pushing for gender equality to raise fertility? The second “No”. Demographic Research, 24(10), 225–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Neyer, G., & Andersson, G. (2008). Consequences of family policies on childbearing: Effects or artifacts? Population and Development Review, 34(4), 699–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Neyer, G., Lappegård, T., Vignoli, D. (2011). Gender equality and fertility: Which equality matters? Stockholm Research Report on Demography SRRD_2011:9.Google Scholar
  54. Neyer, G. and Hoem, J.M. (2008). Education and permanent childlessness: Austria vs. Sweden. A research note. In J. Surkyn., Deboorsere, P. & Van Bavel, J. (Eds.), Demographic challenges for the 21st Century. A state of the art in demography (pp. 91–112). Brussels: VUP Press.Google Scholar
  55. Orloff, A. S. (1993). Gender and the social rights of citizenship: The comparative analysis of gender relations and welfare states. American Sociological Review, 58(3), 303–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Palier, B. (Ed.). (2010). A long goodbye to Bismarck? The politics of welfare reform in continental Europe. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Pierson, P. (1996). The new politics of the welfare state. World Politics, 48(2), 143–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pierson, P. (2001). Coping with permanent austerity. Welfare state restructuring in affluent democracies. In P. Pierson (Ed.), The new politics of the welfare state (pp. 410–456). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Policies to reconcile labor force participation and childbearing in the European Union (2006). Population and Development Review 32(2), 389–393.Google Scholar
  60. Pontusson, J. (2000). Labor market institutions and wage distribution. In T. Iversen., J. Pontussen & D. Soskice. (Eds.), Employment and central banks. macroeconomic coordination and institutional change in social market economies (pp. 292–330). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Rindfuss, R. & Brauner-Otto, S. (2008). Institutions at the transition to adulthood: Implications for fertility tempo in low fertility settings. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 2008, 57–87.Google Scholar
  62. Rønsen, M., & Sundström, M. (2002). Family policy and after birth employment among new mothers: A comparison of Finland, Norway and Sweden. European Journal of Population, 18(2), 121–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Rubery, J. (2009). How gendering the varieties of capitalism requires a wider lens. Social Politics, 16(2), 192–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Sainsbury, D. (Ed.). (1999). Gender and welfare state regimes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Saraceno, C. (2011). Childcare needs and childcare policies: A multidimensional issue. Current Sociology, 59(1), 78–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Saraceno, C., & Keck, W. (2010). Can we identify intergenerational policy regimes in Europe? European Societies, 12(5), 675–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Scharpf, F. W., & Schmidt, V. A. (Eds.). (2000). Welfare and work in the open economy. Volume I: From vulnerability to competitiveness in comparative perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  68. Sleebos, J. (2003). Low fertility rates in OECD countries: Facts and policy responses. OECD Labour Market and Social Policy Occasional Papers 15.Google Scholar
  69. Sobotka, T., Skirbekk, V., & Philipov, D. (2011). Economic recession and fertility in the developed world. Population and Development Review, 37(2), 267–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Soskice, D. (2005). Varieties of capitalism and cross-national gender differences. Social Politics, 12(2), 170–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Szelewa, D. K., & Polakowski, M. P. (2008). Who cares? Changing patterns of childcare in Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 18(2), 115–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Szikra, D., & Tomka, B. (2009). Social policy in East Central Europe: Major trends in the twentieth century. In A. Cerami & P. Vanhuysse (Eds.), Post-communist welfare pathways. Theorizing social policy transformations in Central and Eastern Europe (pp. 17–34). New York: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
  73. Spiess, C.K. (2012). Zeit, Geld, Infrastruktur und Fertilität: Befunde empirischer Mikrostudien und was wir daraus lernen können. In H. Bertram & M. Bujard (Eds.), Zeit, Geld, Infrastrukturzur Zukunft der Familienpolitik (Vol. 19, pp. 321–336). Soziale Welt, Sonderband.Google Scholar
  74. Taylor-Gooby, P. (Ed.). (2004). New risk, new welfare. The transformation of the European welfare state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  75. Thelen, K. (2012). Varieties of capitalism: Trajectories of liberalization and the new politics of social solidarity. Annual Review of Political Science 15, 137–159. First published online as a review in advance 2011.Google Scholar
  76. Thévenon, O. (2008). Family policies in Europe: Available databases and initial comparisons. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 2008, 165–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Thévenon, O. (2011). Family policies in OECD countries: A comparative analysis. Population and Development Review, 37(1), 57–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Thévenon, O., & Gauthier, A. H. (2011). Family policies in developed countries: A ‘fertility booster’ with side effects. Community, Work and Family, 14(2), 197–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Wilensky, H. (1975). The welfare state and equality. Structural and ideological roots of public expenditure. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  80. United Nations. (2002). National Population Policies 2001. New York: United Nations Publications.Google Scholar
  81. United Nations. (2010). World Population Policies 2009. New York: United Nations Publications.Google Scholar
  82. Van Bavel, J. (2010). Subreplacement fertility in the West before the baby boom: Past and current perspectives. Population Studies, 64(1), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht. 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Stockholm University Demography Unit, Department of SociologyStockholm UniversityStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations