Abstract
When it comes to age-based exclusion from suffrage, almost all Western democratic countries and most countries globally use 18 years as the demarcation point. This is accomplished by application of different standards for enfranchisement of ‘adult’ citizens versus ‘child’ citizens. More specifically, a ‘rights–standard’– is in play for adult citizens accessing the vote; while a ‘competency qualification standard’is implicitly applied regarding child citizens’ exclusion from the vote.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Id
Id
Id at p. 90.
Id at pp. 60–115.
Carpini D, M. X. & Keeter S (1996). What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters, Yale University Press, New Haven.
Id at p. 77.
Id at p. 76.
Id at p. 89.
Cheng JD (2008). Uncovering the 26th Amendment, id, reference 155 at p. 28-42
Lau RR, Redlawsk DP (1997). Voting correctly. The American Political Science Review, 91: 585–598.
Id at p. 78.
Bennett, SE (1988). ‘Know-nothings’ revisited: The meaning of political ignorance today. Social Science Quarterly 69: 476–490.
Id at pp. 43–59.
Id at p. 61.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Grover, S.C. (2011). Two Different Standards for Enfranchisement: A ‘Rights Standard’ for Adults and a Supposed ‘Competency Qualification Standard’ for Minors. In: Young People’s Human Rights and The Politics of Voting Age. Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice, vol 6. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8963-2_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8963-2_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-8962-5
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-8963-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)