Skip to main content

Two Different Standards for Enfranchisement: A ‘Rights Standard’ for Adults and a Supposed ‘Competency Qualification Standard’ for Minors

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Young People’s Human Rights and The Politics of Voting Age

Part of the book series: Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice ((IUSGENT,volume 6))

  • 1459 Accesses

Abstract

When it comes to age-based exclusion from suffrage, almost all Western democratic countries and most countries globally use 18 years as the demarcation point. This is accomplished by application of different standards for enfranchisement of ‘adult’ citizens versus ‘child’ citizens. More specifically, a ‘rights–standard’– is in play for adult citizens accessing the vote; while a ‘competency qualification standard’is implicitly applied regarding child citizens’ exclusion from the vote.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Id

    Google Scholar 

  2. Id

    Google Scholar 

  3. Id at p. 90.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Id at pp. 60–115.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Carpini D, M. X. & Keeter S (1996). What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters, Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Id at p. 77.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Id at p. 76.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Id at p. 89.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cheng JD (2008). Uncovering the 26th Amendment, id, reference 155 at p. 28-42

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lau RR, Redlawsk DP (1997). Voting correctly. The American Political Science Review, 91: 585–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Id at p. 78.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bennett, SE (1988). ‘Know-nothings’ revisited: The meaning of political ignorance today. Social Science Quarterly 69: 476–490.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Id at pp. 43–59.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Id at p. 61.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sonja C. Grover .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Grover, S.C. (2011). Two Different Standards for Enfranchisement: A ‘Rights Standard’ for Adults and a Supposed ‘Competency Qualification Standard’ for Minors. In: Young People’s Human Rights and The Politics of Voting Age. Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice, vol 6. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8963-2_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics