Fertility Scenarios for 27 European Countries, 2002–2052

Chapter
Part of the The Springer Series on Demographic Methods and Population Analysis book series (PSDE, volume 32)

Abstract

This chapter summarizes assumptions about future developments of fertility in 27 European countries for the period 2002–2052. Fertility dynamics is presented in the context of a theoretical framework as well as in the context of fertility developments in Europe in the second half of the twentieth century. On this basis, knowledge-based expectations for the future are presented and subsequently quantified. The demographic scenarios obtained in that way are compared with ones applied in similar studies of national and worldwide population projections. The results of the study, the fertility scenarios for the selected European countries, are summarized in brief in the final section of this chapter.

Keywords

Total Fertility Rate Demographic Transition Fertility Pattern Fertility Trend Postsocialist Country 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Alho, J. (1998). A stochastic forecast of the population of Finland. Reviews 1998/4. Helsinki: Statistics Finland.Google Scholar
  2. Becker, G. S. (1991). A treatise on the family (Rev. and enlarged ed.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bongaarts, J. (2001). Fertility and reproductive preferences in post-transitional societies. Population and Development Review, 27(Supplement), 261–281.Google Scholar
  4. Bongaarts, J., & Feeney, G. (1998). On the quantum and tempo of fertility. Population and Development Review, 24(2), 271–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Council of Europe. (1997–2003). Recent demographic developments in Europe. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
  6. Easterlin, R. A. (1975). An economic framework for fertility analysis. Studies in Family Planning, 6, 54–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eurostat. (1997b). Births expectations and their use in fertility forecasting (Eurostat Working Paper E4/1997-4). Luxembourg: Eurostat.Google Scholar
  8. Gauthier, A. (2007). The impact of family policies on fertility in industrialised countries: A review of the literature. Population and Development Review, 26(3), 323–346.Google Scholar
  9. Gjaltema, T. A. (2001, June 7–9). Judgement in population forecasting. Paper prepared for the European Population Conference, Helsinki, Finland.Google Scholar
  10. International Labour Organization. (2003). LABORSTA database on labour statistics. http://laborsta.ilo.org
  11. Keilman, N. (2001, August 18–24). TFR predictions based on Brownian motion theory. Paper prepared for the XXIV IUSSP General Population Conference, Salvador, Brazil.Google Scholar
  12. Keilman, N., & Cruijsen, H. (1992). National population forecasting in industrialized countries. Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
  13. Kohler, H.-P., Billari, F., & Ortega, J. A. (2002). The emergence of lowest-low fertility in Europe during the 1990s. Population and Development Review, 28(4), 641–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lee, R. (1998). Probabilistic approaches to population forecasting. Population and Development Review, 24(Supplement), 156–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lesthaeghe, R., & van de Kaa, D. J. (1986). Twee demografische transities? In D. J. van de Kaa & R. Lesthaeghe (Eds.), Bevolking: Groei en Krimp (pp. 9–24). Deventer: Van Loghum Slaterus.Google Scholar
  16. Liefbroer, A. C., & Corijn, M. (1999). Who, what, where, and when? Specifying the impact of educational attainment and labour force participation on family formation. European Journal of Population, 15(1), 45–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lutz, W., Saariluoma, P., Sanderson, W. C., & Scherbov, S. (2000). New developments in the methodology of expert- and argument-based probabilistic population forecasting (IAASA Interim Report IR-00-020).Google Scholar
  18. Muszyńska, M. (2003). Zróżnicowanie modeli rodziny w krajach europejskich w kontekście statusu kobiety w społeczeństwie [Family models differences in Europe in the context of the status of woman in the society]. Studia Demograficzne nr, 2(144), 55–77.Google Scholar
  19. Okólski, M. (2004). Demografia zmiany społecznej [Demography of social change]. Warsaw: Scholar.Google Scholar
  20. Philipov, D., & Kohler, H.-P. (2001). Tempo effects in the fertility decline in Eastern Europe: Evidence from Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, and Russia. European Journal of Population, 17, 37–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sobotka, T. (2002). Ten years of rapid fertility changes in the European post-communist countries: Evidence and interpretation (Population Research Centre Working Paper 02–1). University of Groningen.Google Scholar
  22. Sobotka, T. (2004). Is lowest-low fertility in Europe explained by the postponement of childbearing? Population and Development Review, 30(2), 195–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Surkyn, J., & Lesthaeghe, R. (2004). Value orientations and the second demographic transition (SDT) in Northern, Western and Southern Europe: An update. Demographic Research Special Collection, 3, 45–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. United Nations. (2003a). World population prospects: 2002 revision. New York/Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar
  25. United Nations. (2003b). UN ECE economic survey of Europe, No. 2. New York: United Nations Economic Commission for Europe.Google Scholar
  26. van de Kaa, D. J. (1987). Europe’s second demographic transition. Population Bulletin, 42(1), 1–57.Google Scholar
  27. van de Kaa, D. J. (2003). Demographics in transition: an essay on continuity and discontinuity in value change. In I. E. Kotowska & J. Jóźwiak (Eds.), Population of Central and Eastern Europe: Challenges and opportunities (pp. 641–663). Warsaw: Statistical Publishing Establishment.Google Scholar
  28. van Imhoff, E. (2001). On the impossibility of inferring cohort fertility measures from period fertility measures. Demographic Research, 5, 23–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Voas, D. (2003). Conflicting preferences: A reason fertility tends to be too high or too low. Population and Development Review, 29(4), 627–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Weston, S. (2002). An introduction to the mathematics and construction of splines. Addix Software Consultancy, http://www.addix.com

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht. 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Social Statistics and Demography, ESRC Centre for Population Change, Southampton Statistical Sciences Research InstituteUniversity of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK

Personalised recommendations